[libcamera-devel] [PATCH 2/2] utils: checkstyle: Catch LOG() usage without an explicit category
Kieran Bingham
kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com
Wed Feb 13 09:17:32 CET 2019
Hi Laurent,
On 12/02/2019 22:25, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Add support for checkers not related to code formatting to the
> checkstyle.py script, and create a first checker that catches usage of
> the LOG() macro without an explicit category.
Ah, now I see why you said it was easy to add extra checkers.
It's easy when you know the architecture of the script at least :)
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> utils/checkstyle.py | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/utils/checkstyle.py b/utils/checkstyle.py
> index f3005d1fbb52..9abd2687b1f9 100755
> --- a/utils/checkstyle.py
> +++ b/utils/checkstyle.py
> @@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ class DiffHunk(object):
> s += Colours.reset()
> s += '\n'
>
> - return s
> + return s[:-1]
I think this chops off the last character in s. Why are you doing that ?
(especially as without seeing the rest of the context, you've only
'just' added a '\n'
Or is that it - to remove the last \n ?
Aha ok it clearly is to remove the \n.
> def append(self, line):
> if line[0] == ' ':
> @@ -229,6 +229,29 @@ available_formatters = {
> # Style checking
> #
>
> +class LogCategoryChecker(object):
> + log_regex = re.compile('\\bLOG\((Debug|Info|Warning|Error|Fatal)\)')
> +
> + def __init__(self, content):
> + self.__content = content
> +
> + def check(self, line_numbers):
> + issues = []
> + for line_number in line_numbers:
> + line = self.__content[line_number-1]
> + if not LogCategoryChecker.log_regex.search(line):
> + continue
> +
> + issues.append([line_number, line, 'LOG() should use categories'])
> +
> + return issues
> +
> +
> +available_checkers = {
> + 'log_category': LogCategoryChecker,
> +}
> +
> +
> def check_file(top_level, commit, filename, formatters):
> # Extract the line numbers touched by the commit.
> diff = subprocess.run(['git', 'diff', '%s~..%s' % (commit, commit), '--',
> @@ -260,20 +283,36 @@ def check_file(top_level, commit, filename, formatters):
> formatted = formatted.splitlines(True)
> diff = difflib.unified_diff(after, formatted)
>
> - # Split the diff in hunks, recording line number ranges for each hunk.
> + # Split the diff in hunks, recording line number ranges for each hunk, and
> + # filter out hunks that are not touched by the commit.
> formatted_diff = parse_diff(diff)
> -
> - # Filter out hunks that are not touched by the commit.
> formatted_diff = [hunk for hunk in formatted_diff if hunk.intersects(lines)]
> - if len(formatted_diff) == 0:
> +
> + # Check for code issues not related to formatting.
> + issues = []
> + for checker in available_checkers:
> + checker = available_checkers[checker](after)
> + for hunk in commit_diff:
> + issues += checker.check(hunk.side('to').touched)
> +
> + # Print the detected issues.
> + if len(issues) == 0 and len(formatted_diff) == 0:
> return 0
>
> print('%s---' % Colours.fg(Colours.Red), filename)
> print('%s+++' % Colours.fg(Colours.Green), filename)
Interestingly, these both print red and green respectively...
> - for hunk in formatted_diff:
> - print(hunk)
>
> - return len(formatted_diff)
> + if len(formatted_diff):
> + for hunk in formatted_diff:
> + print(hunk)
> +
> + if len(issues):
> + issues.sort()
> + for issue in issues:
> + print('%s#%u: %s' % (Colours.fg(Colours.Yellow), issue[0], issue[2]))
But this looks distinctly brown or is it orange ...
I wonder if that's due to my shell perhaps.
> + print('+%s%s' % (issue[1].rstrip(), Colours.reset()))
> +
> + return len(formatted_diff) + len(issues)
>
>
> def check_style(top_level, commit, formatters):
>
--
Regards
--
Kieran
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list