[libcamera-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/2] test: Provide TestStatus validation tests
Jacopo Mondi
jacopo at jmondi.org
Mon Jan 14 11:51:18 CET 2019
Hi Kieran,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 09:54:17AM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> Validate the return values of the objects, and the ability to use "is"
> and "isnt()" correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> test/meson.build | 1 +
> test/test_status.cpp | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 test/test_status.cpp
>
> diff --git a/test/meson.build b/test/meson.build
> index 32152888a55e..ae5bd7b47b3b 100644
> --- a/test/meson.build
> +++ b/test/meson.build
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ public_tests = [
> ['event', 'event.cpp'],
> ['list-cameras', 'list-cameras.cpp'],
> ['signal', 'signal.cpp'],
> + ['test_status', 'test_status.cpp'],
> ['timer', 'timer.cpp'],
> ]
>
> diff --git a/test/test_status.cpp b/test/test_status.cpp
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..297cc5189f49
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/test/test_status.cpp
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2018, Google Inc.
> + *
> + * list.cpp - camera list tests
I know where this comes from
> + */
> +
> +#include <iostream>
> +#include <string>
Do you need these?
> +
> +#include "test.h"
> +
> +class TestStatusTest : public Test
> +{
> +protected:
> + int run()
> + {
> + // plan(8);
> + // note("Correct output here is 1 skip, and three failures");
Please drop there
> +
> + /*
> + * TestStatusPass should return 0.
> + * Test without operator=
> + */
> + if (TestStatusPass("[Verify TestStatusPass]"))
> + return TestStatusFail("TestStatusPass test");
> +
> + /* Test an integer on the rhs. */
> + if (TestStatusFail("[Verify TestStatusFail]") != -1)
> + return TestStatusFail("TestStatusFail test");
> +
> + /* Test an integer on the lhs. */
> + if (77 != TestStatusSkip("[Verify TestStatusSkip]"))
> + return TestStatusFail("TestStatusSkip test");
> +
> + if (is(1, 1, "[Good is return check]") != TestStatusBase::ValuePass)
> + return TestStatusFail("Good is check failed");
Please use '' around is, otherwise the result is very confusing
Test: 4: ok - [Good 'is()' return check]
I would actually write is as:
"'is()' predicated test successful"
> +
> + if (isnt(1, 0, "[Good isn't return check]") != TestStatusBase::ValuePass)
> + return TestStatusFail("Good isn't check failed");
same here and below
> +
> + if (is(1, 0, "[Bad Is Check]") == TestStatusBase::ValuePass)
> + return TestStatusFail("Bad is check failed");
> +
> + if (isnt(1, 1, "[Bad Isn't check]") == TestStatusBase::ValuePass)
> + return TestStatusFail("Bad isn't check failed");
> +
> + return TestStatusPass("TestStatus validations");
Could you make tests where the message output is created by
concatenating strings? I assume will be used a lot in practice..
std::string tmp="a string";
if (TestStatusPass("[Verify " + tmp + " TestStatusPass]"))
return TestStatusFail("TestStatusPass test");
Thanks
j
> + }
> +};
> +
> +TEST_REGISTER(TestStatusTest)
> --
> 2.17.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> libcamera-devel mailing list
> libcamera-devel at lists.libcamera.org
> https://lists.libcamera.org/listinfo/libcamera-devel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.libcamera.org/pipermail/libcamera-devel/attachments/20190114/e38be817/attachment.sig>
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list