[libcamera-devel] [PATCH v2 5/7] libcamera: camera: Add acquire() and release()

[Niklas Söderlund]

Hi Laurent,

Thanks for your feedback.

On 2019-01-26 11:48:55 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 04:33:38PM +0100, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> > From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund at ragnatech.se>
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund at ragnatech.se>
> > ---
> >  include/libcamera/camera.h |  5 +++++
> >  src/libcamera/camera.cpp   | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/libcamera/camera.h b/include/libcamera/camera.h
> > index a2ded62de94814c4..7e358f8c0aa093cf 100644
> > --- a/include/libcamera/camera.h
> > +++ b/include/libcamera/camera.h
> > @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ public:
> >  
> >  	Signal<Camera *> disconnected;
> >  
> > +	int acquire();
> > +	void release();
> > +
> >  private:
> >  	Camera(PipelineHandler *pipe, const std::string &name);
> >  	~Camera();
> > @@ -38,6 +41,8 @@ private:
> >  
> >  	std::shared_ptr<PipelineHandler> pipe_;
> >  	std::string name_;
> > +
> > +	bool acquired_;
> >  };
> >  
> >  } /* namespace libcamera */
> > diff --git a/src/libcamera/camera.cpp b/src/libcamera/camera.cpp
> > index 9cec289282e4797b..fd19e8cf6694cc1b 100644
> > --- a/src/libcamera/camera.cpp
> > +++ b/src/libcamera/camera.cpp
> > @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ const std::string &Camera::name() const
> >   */
> >  
> >  Camera::Camera(PipelineHandler *pipe, const std::string &name)
> > -	: pipe_(pipe->shared_from_this()), name_(name)
> > +	: pipe_(pipe->shared_from_this()), name_(name), acquired_(false)
> >  {
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -127,4 +127,37 @@ void Camera::disconnect()
> >  	disconnected.emit(this);
> >  }
> >  
> > +/**
> > + * \brief Acquire the camera device for exclusive access
> > + *
> > + * After opening the device with open(), exclusive access must be obtained
> > + * before performing operations that change the device state. This function is
> > + * not blocking, if the device has already been acquired (by the same or another
> > + * process) the -EBUSY error code is returned.
> > + *
> > + * Once exclusive access isn't needed anymore, the device should be released
> > + * with a call to the release() function.
> 
> Let's add a
> 
>   \todo Implement exclusive access across processes.

Done.

> 
> > + *
> > + * \return 0 on success or a negative error code on error.
> > + */
> > +int Camera::acquire()
> > +{
> > +	if (acquired_)
> > +		return -EBUSY;
> > +
> > +	acquired_ = true;
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * \brief Release exclusive access to the camera device
> > + *
> > + * Releasing the camera device allows other users to acquire exclusive access
> > + * with the acquire() function.
> > + */
> > +void Camera::release()
> > +{
> > +	acquired_ = false;
> > +}
> > +
> >  } /* namespace libcamera */
> 
> Should we add a warning in the destructor in case acquired_ is true,
> similarly to what is done in DeviceEnumerator::~DeviceEnumerator() ?

I think this is a good idea, will do so in next version.

> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Pinchart

-- 
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund