[libcamera-devel] [PATCH 6/6] test: Add test case for signal delivery across threads
Niklas Söderlund
niklas.soderlund at ragnatech.se
Thu Jul 11 07:53:47 CEST 2019
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for your test.
On 2019-07-10 22:17:08 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> The test case creates a receiver inheriting from Object, connects a
> signal to one of its slot, moves the receiver to a different thread,
> emits the signal and verifies that it gets delivered in the correct
> thread with the expected value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> test/meson.build | 1 +
> test/signal-threads.cpp | 125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 126 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 test/signal-threads.cpp
>
> diff --git a/test/meson.build b/test/meson.build
> index 1f87319aeb65..60ce9601cc55 100644
> --- a/test/meson.build
> +++ b/test/meson.build
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ public_tests = [
> internal_tests = [
> ['camera-sensor', 'camera-sensor.cpp'],
> ['message', 'message.cpp'],
> + ['signal-threads', 'signal-threads.cpp'],
> ['threads', 'threads.cpp'],
> ]
>
> diff --git a/test/signal-threads.cpp b/test/signal-threads.cpp
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c21f32ae0c20
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/test/signal-threads.cpp
> @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2019, Google Inc.
> + *
> + * signal-threads.cpp - Cross-thread signal delivery test
> + */
> +
> +#include <chrono>
> +#include <iostream>
> +#include <thread>
> +
> +#include "message.h"
> +#include "thread.h"
> +#include "test.h"
> +#include "utils.h"
> +
> +using namespace std;
> +using namespace libcamera;
> +
> +class SignalReceiver : public Object
> +{
> +public:
> + enum Status {
> + NoSignal,
> + InvalidThread,
> + SignalReceived,
> + };
> +
> + SignalReceiver()
> + : status_(NoSignal)
> + {
> + }
> +
> + Status status() const { return status_; }
> + int value() const { return value_; }
> + void reset()
> + {
> + status_ = NoSignal;
> + value_ = 0;
> + }
> +
> + void slot(int value)
> + {
> + if (Thread::current() != thread())
> + status_ = InvalidThread;
> + else
> + status_ = SignalReceived;
> +
> + value_ = value;
> + }
> +
> +private:
> + Status status_;
> + int value_;
> +};
> +
> +class SignalThreadsTest : public Test
> +{
> +protected:
> + int run()
> + {
> + SignalReceiver receiver;
> + signal_.connect(&receiver, &SignalReceiver::slot);
> +
> + /* Test that a signal is received in the main thread. */
> + signal_.emit(42);
> +
> + switch (receiver.status()) {
> + case SignalReceiver::NoSignal:
> + cout << "No signal received for direct connection" << endl;
> + return TestFail;
> + case SignalReceiver::InvalidThread:
> + cout << "Signal received in incorrect thread "
> + "for direct connection" << endl;
> + return TestFail;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
It's verified in other Signal tests that the argument(s) are delivered
but for the sake of us with OCD you might consider adding a
receiver.value() != 42 check here ;-)
With this fixed,
Reviewed-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund at ragnatech.se>
> +
> + /*
> + * Move the object to a thread and verify that the signal is
> + * correctly delivered, with the correct data.
> + */
> + receiver.reset();
> + receiver.moveToThread(&thread_);
> +
> + thread_.start();
> +
> + signal_.emit(42);
> +
> + this_thread::sleep_for(chrono::milliseconds(100));
> +
> + switch (receiver.status()) {
> + case SignalReceiver::NoSignal:
> + cout << "No signal received for message connection" << endl;
> + return TestFail;
> + case SignalReceiver::InvalidThread:
> + cout << "Signal received in incorrect thread "
> + "for message connection" << endl;
> + return TestFail;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + if (receiver.value() != 42) {
> + cout << "Signal received with incorrect value" << endl;
> + return TestFail;
> + }
> +
> + return TestPass;
> + }
> +
> + void cleanup()
> + {
> + thread_.exit(0);
> + thread_.wait();
> + }
> +
> +private:
> + Thread thread_;
> +
> + Signal<int> signal_;
> +};
> +
> +TEST_REGISTER(SignalThreadsTest)
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
>
> _______________________________________________
> libcamera-devel mailing list
> libcamera-devel at lists.libcamera.org
> https://lists.libcamera.org/listinfo/libcamera-devel
--
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list