[libcamera-devel] [meta-multimedia][PATCH v2] libcamera: fix packaging and installation

Andrey Konovalov andrey.konovalov at linaro.org
Sun Aug 2 21:04:17 CEST 2020


Hi Laurent,

On 01.08.2020 16:01, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 05:39:19PM +0300, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
>> libcamera checks if RPATH or RUNPATH dynamic tag is present in
>> libcamera.so. If it does, it assumes that libcamera binaries are
>> run directly from the build directory without installing them, and
>> tries to use resorces like IPA modules from the build directory.
>> Mainline meson strips RPATH/RUNPATH out from libcamera.so file
>> at install time. But openembedded-core patches meson to disable
>> RPATH/RUNPATH removal. That's why  we need to remove this tag manually
>> in do_install_append().
>>
>> IPA module is signed (with openssl dgst) after it is built. But
>> during packaging the OE build system 1) splits out debugging info,
>> and 2) strips the binaries. So the IPA module so file installed
>> isn't the one which the signature was calculated against. Then
>> the signature check fails, and libcamera tries to run the IPA
>> module isolated (in a sandbox), which doesn't work if the IPA
>> module wasn't designed to run isolated. The solution is to
>> recalculate the IPA modules signatures in ${PKGD} after do_package().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andrey.konovalov at linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   Changes in v2:
>>    - Recalculate the IPA modules signatures after do_package()
>>      instead of disabling stripping and splitting libcamera package
>>
>>   .../recipes-multimedia/libcamera/libcamera.bb     | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta-multimedia/recipes-multimedia/libcamera/libcamera.bb b/meta-multimedia/recipes-multimedia/libcamera/libcamera.bb
>> index 00a5c480d..30c6600e5 100644
>> --- a/meta-multimedia/recipes-multimedia/libcamera/libcamera.bb
>> +++ b/meta-multimedia/recipes-multimedia/libcamera/libcamera.bb
>> @@ -18,13 +18,26 @@ PV = "202006+git${SRCPV}"
>>   
>>   S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
>>   
>> -DEPENDS = "python3-pyyaml-native udev gnutls boost"
>> +DEPENDS = "python3-pyyaml-native udev gnutls boost chrpath-native"
>>   DEPENDS += "${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'qt', 'qtbase qtbase-native', '', d)}"
>>   
>>   RDEPENDS_${PN} = "${@bb.utils.contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'wayland qt', 'qtwayland', '', d)}"
>>   
>>   inherit meson pkgconfig python3native
>>   
>> +do_install_append() {
>> +    chrpath -d ${D}${libdir}/libcamera.so
>> +}
>> +
>> +addtask do_recalculate_ipa_signatures_package after do_package before do_packagedata
>> +do_recalculate_ipa_signatures_package() {
>> +    for module in $(find "${PKGD}/usr/lib/libcamera" -name "*.so.sign"); do
>> +        if [ -f "${module%.sign}" ] ; then
>> +            "${S}/src/ipa/ipa-sign.sh" "${B}/src/ipa-priv-key.pem" "${module%.sign}" "${module}"
>> +        fi
>> +    done
> 
> Note that you could also use the src/ipa/ipa-sign-install.sh script,
> which takes the key as the first argument followed by the list of .so
> files to sign. Something along the lines of (not tested)
> 
>      local modules
>      for module in $(find "${PKGD}/usr/lib/libcamera" -name "*.so.sign"); do
>          module="${module%.sign}"
>          if [ -f "${module}" ] ; then
> 	    modules="${modules} ${module}"
>          fi
>      done
> 
>      "${S}/src/ipa/ipa-sign-install.sh" "${B}/src/ipa-priv-key.pem" ${modules}
> 
> I think this will lower the risk of breakage in the future, as
> ipa-sign.sh will have a higher chance of being refactored than
> ipa-sign-install.sh

OK, makes sense. Thanks for the suggestion!

When creating v2 I've got the impression of ipa-sign-install.sh relying
on running in meson environment - when run as part of 'meson install'
it prefixes each module with ${MESON_INSTALL_DESTDIR_PREFIX}/.
But ipa-sign-install.sh also works OK when used in do_recalculate_ipa_signatures_package() -
"${MESON_INSTALL_DESTDIR_PREFIX}" resolves to "", and the ${modules}
use full path names.

> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>

Thanks,
Andrey

>> +}
>> +
>>   FILES_${PN}-dev = "${includedir} ${libdir}/pkgconfig"
>>   FILES_${PN} += " ${libdir}/libcamera.so"
> 


More information about the libcamera-devel mailing list