[libcamera-devel] [PATCH v5 2/5] libcamera: camera_sensor: Generate a sensor ID

Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Sun Aug 2 23:50:45 CEST 2020


Hi Niklas,

On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 11:46:37PM +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> On 2020-08-02 21:26:55 +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 01:50:52PM +0200, Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> > > Generate a constant and unique string ID for the sensor. The ID is
> > > generated from information from the firmware description of the camera
> > > image sensor. The ID is unique and persistent across reboots of the
> > > system.
> > > 
> > > For OF based systems the ID is the full path of the sensors in the
> > > device tree description. For ACPI based systems the ID is the ACPI
> > > firmware nodes path. Both ID sources are guaranteed to be unique and
> > > persistent as long as the firmware of the system is not changed.
> > > 
> > > A special case is needed to deal with the VIMC pipeline that implements
> > > a virtual pipeline that is not backed by any hardware device and is
> > > therefore not described in the device firmware.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund at ragnatech.se>
> > > Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo at jmondi.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com>
> > > ---
> > > * Changes since v4
> > > - Fix spelling.
> > > 
> > > * Changes since v3
> > > - Update commit message.
> > > - Add description of how ID are generated to comment.
> > > ---
> > >  include/libcamera/internal/camera_sensor.h |  4 +
> > >  src/libcamera/camera_sensor.cpp            | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 98 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/libcamera/internal/camera_sensor.h b/include/libcamera/internal/camera_sensor.h
> > > index 06c8292ca30129de..e0d2d9f63b47c2fe 100644
> > > --- a/include/libcamera/internal/camera_sensor.h
> > > +++ b/include/libcamera/internal/camera_sensor.h
> > > @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ public:
> > >  	int init();
> > >  
> > >  	const std::string &model() const { return model_; }
> > > +	const std::string &id() const { return id_; }
> > >  	const MediaEntity *entity() const { return entity_; }
> > >  	const std::vector<unsigned int> &mbusCodes() const { return mbusCodes_; }
> > >  	const std::vector<Size> &sizes() const { return sizes_; }
> > > @@ -67,11 +68,14 @@ protected:
> > >  	std::string logPrefix() const override;
> > >  
> > >  private:
> > > +	int generateID();
> > > +
> > >  	const MediaEntity *entity_;
> > >  	std::unique_ptr<V4L2Subdevice> subdev_;
> > >  	unsigned int pad_;
> > >  
> > >  	std::string model_;
> > > +	std::string id_;
> > >  
> > >  	V4L2Subdevice::Formats formats_;
> > >  	Size resolution_;
> > > diff --git a/src/libcamera/camera_sensor.cpp b/src/libcamera/camera_sensor.cpp
> > > index 350f49accad99c7b..6dc616945dad5ef1 100644
> > > --- a/src/libcamera/camera_sensor.cpp
> > > +++ b/src/libcamera/camera_sensor.cpp
> > > @@ -9,10 +9,12 @@
> > >  
> > >  #include <algorithm>
> > >  #include <float.h>
> > > +#include <fstream>
> > >  #include <iomanip>
> > >  #include <limits.h>
> > >  #include <math.h>
> > >  #include <regex>
> > > +#include <sys/stat.h>
> > >  
> > >  #include <libcamera/property_ids.h>
> > >  
> > > @@ -204,6 +206,11 @@ int CameraSensor::init()
> > >  	if (ret < 0)
> > >  		return ret;
> > >  
> > > +	/* Generate a unique ID for the sensor. */
> > > +	ret = generateID();
> > > +	if (ret)
> > > +		return ret;
> > > +
> > >  	/* Retrieve and store the camera sensor properties. */
> > >  	const ControlInfoMap &controls = subdev_->controls();
> > >  	int32_t propertyValue;
> > > @@ -283,6 +290,26 @@ int CameraSensor::init()
> > >   * \return The sensor model name
> > >   */
> > >  
> > > +/**
> > > + * \fn CameraSensor::id()
> > > + * \brief Retrieve the sensor ID
> > > + *
> > > + * The sensor ID is a free-formed string that uniquely identifies the sensor in
> > > + * the system. The ID is persistent between different instances of libcamera and
> > > + * between resets of the system.
> > > + *
> > > + * For OF based systems the ID is the full path of the sensors in the device
> > > + * tree description. For ACPI based systems the ID is the ACPI firmware nodes
> > > + * path. Both ID sources are guaranteed to be unique and persistent as long as
> > > + * the firmware of the system is not changed.
> > > + *
> > > + * A special case is needed to deal with the VIMC pipeline that implements a
> > > + * virtual pipeline that is not backed by any hardware device and is therefore
> > > + * not described in the device firmware.
> > > + *
> > > + * \return The sensor ID
> > > + */
> > > +
> > >  /**
> > >   * \fn CameraSensor::entity()
> > >   * \brief Retrieve the sensor media entity
> > > @@ -541,4 +568,71 @@ std::string CameraSensor::logPrefix() const
> > >  	return "'" + entity_->name() + "'";
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +int CameraSensor::generateID()
> > > +{
> > > +	std::string path, devPath = subdev_->devicePath();
> > 
> > We usually split declarations on multiple lines.
> > 
> > > +	struct stat statbuf;
> > > +
> > > +	/* Try to generate ID from OF device tree path.  */
> > > +	path = devPath + "/of_node";
> > > +	if (stat(path.c_str(), &statbuf) == 0) {
> > 
> > You can use
> > 
> > 	if (!File::exists(path)) {
> > 
> > > +		char ofPath[PATH_MAX];
> > > +
> > > +		if (!realpath(path.c_str(), ofPath)) {
> > 
> > As mentioned in the review of 1/5, should we use realpath with nullptr
> > as the second argument ? Or maybe just use readlink() with PATH_MAX ?
> > 
> > > +			LOG(CameraSensor, Error) << "Failed to read sensor OF based ID";
> > 
> > s/OF based/OF-based/
> > 
> > > +			return -EINVAL;
> > > +		}
> > > +
> > > +		id_ = ofPath;
> > > +		const std::string dropStr = "/sys/firmware/devicetree/";
> > 
> > static const ?
> > 
> > Same comments for the other options below.
> > 
> > > +		if (id_.find(dropStr) == 0)
> > > +			id_.erase(0, dropStr.length());
> > > +
> > > +		return 0;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	/* Try to generate ID from ACPI path. */
> > > +	path = devPath + "/firmware_node/path";
> > > +	if (stat(path.c_str(), &statbuf) == 0) {
> > > +		std::ifstream file(path.c_str());
> > > +
> > > +		if (!file.is_open()) {
> > > +			LOG(CameraSensor, Error) << "Failed to read sensor ACPI based ID";
> > > +			return -EINVAL;
> > > +		}
> > > +
> > > +		std::getline(file, id_);
> > > +		file.close();
> > > +
> > > +		return 0;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * VIMC is a virtual video pipeline not backed hardware and has no OF
> > > +	 * or ACPI firmware nodes. Handle this pipeline as a special case and
> > > +	 * generate IDs based on the sensor model.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	path = devPath + "/modalias";
> > > +	if (stat(path.c_str(), &statbuf) == 0) {
> > > +		std::ifstream file(path.c_str());
> > > +
> > > +		if (!file.is_open()) {
> > > +			LOG(CameraSensor, Error) << "Failed to read sensor ACPI based ID";

This shouldn't read "ACPI".

> > > +			return -EINVAL;
> > > +		}
> > > +
> > > +		std::string modalias;
> > > +		std::getline(file, modalias);
> > > +		file.close();
> > > +
> > > +		if (modalias == "platform:vimc") {
> > > +			id_ = "VIMC " + model();
> > > +			return 0;
> > > +		}
> > 
> > Should we make this case more generic with the following (pseudo-code) ?
> > 
> > 	id_ = basename(readlink(devPath + "/device")) + "/" + model_;
> 
> I don't think so, at least not for now. The only valid use-case to reach 
> this code is for the VIMC pipeline handler (and later perhaps VIVID). I 
> would prefers keeping it strict for now and loosen it as we add 
> pipelines we can test and make sure the id is stable.

We could keep the driver check, and already use the vimc.0 device name
instead of "VIMC" to prepare for the future.

And given that you will need to factor out the ACPI and OF parts as
they're useful for USB too, I wonder if the VIMC special case should be
kept in CameraSensor, or shouldn't move to the VIMC pipeline handler
instead. I'd prefer avoiding pipeline-handler-specific code in
CameraSensor if possible.

> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	LOG(CameraSensor, Error) << "Unknown sensor device type, can not generate ID";
> > > +	return -EINVAL;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  } /* namespace libcamera */

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


More information about the libcamera-devel mailing list