[libcamera-devel] [PATCH v2 2/6] checkstyle: Exit with 1 status if issues are found
Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Fri Jan 17 23:14:55 CET 2020
Hi Nicolas,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 05:07:40PM -0500, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> Le vendredi 17 janvier 2020 à 23:58 +0200, Laurent Pinchart a écrit :
> > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 02:17:29PM -0500, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> > > From: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne at collabora.com>
> > >
> > > Makes the tool return 1 if there is any potential issues. This is
> > > needed when using this tool for pre-commit hook in order to abort
> > > the commit process.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne at collabora.com>
> > > ---
> > > utils/checkstyle.py | 9 ++++++---
> > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > mode change 100755 => 100644 utils/checkstyle.py
> > >
> > > diff --git a/utils/checkstyle.py b/utils/checkstyle.py
> > > old mode 100755
> > > new mode 100644
> > > index 7edea25..e7375b3
> > > --- a/utils/checkstyle.py
> > > +++ b/utils/checkstyle.py
> > > @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ def check_style(top_level, commit):
> > > files = [f for f in files if len([p for p in patterns if
> > > fnmatch.fnmatch(os.path.basename(f), p)])]
> > > if len(files) == 0:
> > > print("Commit doesn't touch source files, skipping")
> > > - return
> > > + return 0
> > >
> > > issues = 0
> > > for f in files:
> > > @@ -554,6 +554,8 @@ def check_style(top_level, commit):
> > > print("%u potential style %s detected, please review" % \
> > > (issues, 'issue' if issues == 1 else 'issues'))
> > >
> > > + return issues
> > > +
> > >
> > > def extract_revlist(revs):
> > > """Extract a list of commits on which to operate from a revision or
> > > revision
> > > @@ -632,11 +634,12 @@ def main(argv):
> > >
> > > revlist = extract_revlist(args.revision_range)
> > >
> > > + issues = 0
> > > for commit in revlist:
> > > - check_style(top_level, commit)
> > > + issues += check_style(top_level, commit)
> > > print('')
> > >
> > > - return 0
> > > + return min(issues, 1)
> >
> > I find this a bit difficult to read, but the python alternative to the C
> > ternary operator would be
> >
> > return issues and 1 or 0
> >
> > which may not be more reable.
> >
> > if issues:
> > return 1
> > else:
> > return 0
> >
> > may be an option, but not very nice either. I'll leave it up to you,
> > maybe
> >
> > # Return an error if any issues have been detected
> > return min(issues, 0)
>
> One of the two last suggestion will do, I have no preference, but not the first
> one, that's just worst. Will you fix it why pushing ?
If you don't see a need to send a v3 due to other patches in this
series, I'll fix this (and possibly other small issues in other patches)
when pushing, yes.
> >
> > In any case,
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > if __name__ == '__main__':
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list