[libcamera-devel] [PATCH] gitignore: Ignore all build directories
Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Thu Jun 4 11:15:57 CEST 2020
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 10:09:54AM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> On 04/06/2020 10:07, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Kieran,
> >
> > Thank you for the patch.
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 09:49:08AM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> >> It can be common to have multiple build directories with different
> >> configurations. Ignore them all.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com>
> >> ---
> >> .gitignore | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
> >> index f989dee3bcb0..aecf971d30aa 100644
> >> --- a/.gitignore
> >> +++ b/.gitignore
> >> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> >> __pycache__/
> >> -build/
> >> +*build*/
> >
> > That's a bit of a too generic pattern, we could later have a directory
> > with build in its name.
> >
> > I personally have a single build/ directory directly at the root of the
> > source tree, and create subdirectories there for different builds. All
> > it requires is 'meson setup ../..' instead of 'meson setup ..' (and it
> > works fine with the the run-from-build-dir support we have). Could that
> > be a solution you would consider instead of this patch ?
>
> how about ./*build*/ to only match on the root then.
I'm still cautious about patterns that could have unexpected matches :-)
And what if someone wants to name their build directories differently ?
I think .gitignore should include minimal policy, if we can restrict
ignoring the builds to a single directory, I'd prefer that (I'm even
tempted to say we shouldn't include build/ in .gitignore, but I agree
it's useful).
> >> patches/
> >> *.patch
> >> *.pyc
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list