[libcamera-devel] [PATCH 02/31] test: Add Span test

Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Mon Mar 2 17:43:49 CET 2020


Hi Kieran,

On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 03:57:08PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> On 29/02/2020 16:42, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Add a compile-only test that exercises the whole Span API, as template
> > functions are not fully compile-tested when the file is parsed.
> 
> Do we not want any run-time testing ?

Ideally yes, but feel free to submit a patch :-) I think we're fine with
testing the span implementation through its users for now.

> If this 'does nothing' I presume the compiler will just optimise it out
> in the end? (Not a problem for compile time testing of course, and
> speeds up run-time testing as a perk )

Up to the compiler :-)

> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> 
> I think such a core feature might warrant some actual run-time testing
> at some point to make sure it does the right thing, but perhaps that
> will become implicit with usage too, and does not detract from the
> current testing here..

As the implementation is supposed to be C++20-compliant, if we want to
test it, I think we should use test cases from libstdc++ or libc++.

> so
> 
> With a small comment below:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com>
> 
> > ---
> >  test/meson.build |   1 +
> >  test/span.cpp    | 177 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 178 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 test/span.cpp
> > 
> > diff --git a/test/meson.build b/test/meson.build
> > index daaa1aac926d..92be382bfe41 100644
> > --- a/test/meson.build
> > +++ b/test/meson.build
> > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ internal_tests = [
> >      ['object',                          'object.cpp'],
> >      ['object-invoke',                   'object-invoke.cpp'],
> >      ['signal-threads',                  'signal-threads.cpp'],
> > +    ['span',                            'span.cpp'],
> 
> Shouldn't this go into public_tests ?
> 
> Isn't span going to be part of the public API because of it's role in
> controls?

You're right, I'll fix that.

> >      ['threads',                         'threads.cpp'],
> >      ['timer',                           'timer.cpp'],
> >      ['timer-thread',                    'timer-thread.cpp'],
> > diff --git a/test/span.cpp b/test/span.cpp
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..609749f51b86
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/test/span.cpp
> > @@ -0,0 +1,177 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2020, Google Inc.
> > + *
> > + * span.cpp - Span tests
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <array>
> > +#include <iostream>
> > +#include <vector>
> > +
> > +#include <libcamera/span.h>
> > +
> > +#include "test.h"
> > +
> > +using namespace std;
> > +using namespace libcamera;
> > +
> > +class SpanTest : public Test
> > +{
> > +protected:
> > +	int run()
> > +	{
> > +		int i[4]{ 1, 2, 3, 4 };
> > +		std::array<int, 4> a{ 1, 2, 3, 4 };
> > +		const std::array<int, 4> ca{ 1, 2, 3, 4 };
> > +		std::vector<int> v{ 1, 2, 3, 4 };
> > +		const std::vector<int> cv{ 1, 2, 3, 4 };
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Compile-test construction and usage of spans with static
> > +		 * extent. Commented-out tests are expected not to compile, or
> > +		 * to generate undefined behaviour.
> > +		 */
> > +
> > +		Span<int, 0>{};
> > +		/* Span<int, 4>{}; */
> > +
> > +		Span<int, 4>{ &i[0], 4 };
> > +		Span<int, 4>{ &i[0], &i[3] };
> > +
> > +		Span<int, 4>{ i };
> > +		/* Span<float, 4>{ i }; */
> > +		/* Span<int, 2>{ i }; */
> > +
> > +		Span<int, 4>{ a };
> > +		Span<const int, 4>{ a };
> > +		/* Span<float, 4>{ a }; */
> > +		/* Span<int, 2>{ a }; */
> > +
> > +		Span<const int, 4>{ ca };
> > +		/* Span<const int, 2>{ ca }; */
> > +		/* Span<const float, 4>{ ca }; */
> > +		/* Span<int, 4>{ ca }; */
> > +
> > +		Span<int, 4>{ v };
> > +		Span<const int, 4>{ v };
> > +		/* Span<float, 4>{ v }; */
> > +
> > +		Span<const int, 4>{ v };
> > +		/* Span<int, 4>{ v }; */
> > +		/* Span<const float, 4>{ v }; */
> > +
> > +		Span<int, 4> staticSpan{ i };
> > +		Span<int, 4>{ staticSpan };
> > +		Span<const int, 4>{ staticSpan };
> > +		/* Span<const int, 2>{ staticSpan }; */
> > +
> > +		staticSpan = Span<int, 4>{ v };
> > +
> > +		staticSpan.begin();
> > +		staticSpan.cbegin();
> > +		staticSpan.end();
> > +		staticSpan.cend();
> > +		staticSpan.rbegin();
> > +		staticSpan.crbegin();
> > +		staticSpan.rend();
> > +		staticSpan.crend();
> > +
> > +		staticSpan.front();
> > +		staticSpan.back();
> > +		staticSpan[0];
> > +		staticSpan.data();
> > +
> > +		staticSpan.size();
> > +		staticSpan.size_bytes();
> > +
> > +		staticSpan.empty();
> > +
> > +		staticSpan.first<2>();
> > +		staticSpan.first(2);
> > +		/* staticSpan.first<6>(); */
> > +		/* staticSpan.first(6); */
> > +		staticSpan.last<2>();
> > +		staticSpan.last(2);
> > +		/* staticSpan.last<6>(); */
> > +		/* staticSpan.last(6); */
> > +		staticSpan.subspan<1>();
> > +		staticSpan.subspan<1, 2>();
> > +		staticSpan.subspan(1);
> > +		staticSpan.subspan(1, 2);
> > +		/* staticSpan.subspan(2, 4); */
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * Compile-test construction and usage of spans with static
> > +		 * extent. Commented-out tests are expected not to compile, or
> > +		 * to generate undefined behaviour.
> > +		 */
> > +
> > +		Span<int>{};
> > +
> > +		Span<int>{ &i[0], 4 };
> > +		Span<int>{ &i[0], &i[3] };
> > +
> > +		Span<int>{ i };
> > +		/* Span<float>{ i }; */
> > +
> > +		Span<int>{ a };
> > +		Span<const int>{ a };
> > +		/* Span<float>{ a }; */
> > +
> > +		Span<const int>{ ca };
> > +		/* Span<const float>{ca}; */
> > +		/* Span<int>{ca}; */
> > +
> > +		Span<int>{ v };
> > +		Span<const int>{ v };
> > +		/* Span<float>{ v }; */
> > +
> > +		Span<const int>{ v };
> > +		/* Span<int>{ v }; */
> > +		/* Span<const float>{ v }; */
> > +
> > +		Span<int> dynamicSpan{ i };
> > +		Span<int>{ dynamicSpan };
> > +		Span<const int>{ dynamicSpan };
> > +
> > +		dynamicSpan = Span<int>{ a };
> > +
> > +		dynamicSpan.begin();
> > +		dynamicSpan.cbegin();
> > +		dynamicSpan.end();
> > +		dynamicSpan.cend();
> > +		dynamicSpan.rbegin();
> > +		dynamicSpan.crbegin();
> > +		dynamicSpan.rend();
> > +		dynamicSpan.crend();
> > +
> > +		dynamicSpan.front();
> > +		dynamicSpan.back();
> > +		dynamicSpan[0];
> > +		dynamicSpan.data();
> > +
> > +		dynamicSpan.size();
> > +		dynamicSpan.size_bytes();
> > +
> > +		dynamicSpan.empty();
> > +
> > +		dynamicSpan.first<2>();
> > +		dynamicSpan.first(2);
> > +		/* dynamicSpan.first<6>(); */
> > +		/* dynamicSpan.first(6); */
> > +		dynamicSpan.last<2>();
> > +		dynamicSpan.last(2);
> > +		/* dynamicSpan.last<6>(); */
> > +		/* dynamicSpan.last(6); */
> > +		dynamicSpan.subspan<1>();
> > +		dynamicSpan.subspan<1, 2>();
> > +		dynamicSpan.subspan(1);
> > +		dynamicSpan.subspan(1, 2);
> > +		/* dynamicSpan.subspan(2, 4); */
> > +
> > +		return TestPass;
> > +	}
> > +};
> > +
> > +TEST_REGISTER(SpanTest)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


More information about the libcamera-devel mailing list