[libcamera-devel] [PATCH 12/31] libcamera: controls: Move ControlValue get() and set() to controls.h
Kieran Bingham
kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com
Tue Mar 3 00:25:25 CET 2020
Hi Laurent,
On 29/02/2020 16:42, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> To avoid defining all specializations of ControlValue::get() and
> ControlValue::set() manually, move the definition of those functions to
> controls.h.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
I'll put this here, but that 'bool_' reference is annoying below:
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> include/libcamera/controls.h | 15 ++++++++++--
> src/libcamera/controls.cpp | 47 ------------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/libcamera/controls.h b/include/libcamera/controls.h
> index 429f01b0fd24..39e240438861 100644
> --- a/include/libcamera/controls.h
> +++ b/include/libcamera/controls.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
> #ifndef __LIBCAMERA_CONTROLS_H__
> #define __LIBCAMERA_CONTROLS_H__
>
> +#include <assert.h>
> #include <string>
> #include <unordered_map>
>
> @@ -70,9 +71,19 @@ public:
> }
>
> template<typename T>
> - T get() const;
> + T get() const
> + {
> + assert(type_ == details::control_type<std::remove_cv_t<T>>::value);
> +
> + return *reinterpret_cast<const T *>(&bool_);
I don't like how all cases now look like they use a bool.
The union is feeling quite pointless here...
Perhaps remove the union and just store int64_t value_; ?
> + }
> +
> template<typename T>
> - void set(const T &value);
> + void set(const T &value)
> + {
> + type_ = details::control_type<std::remove_cv_t<T>>::value;
Aha nice :-)
> + *reinterpret_cast<T *>(&bool_) = value;
> + }
>
> private:
> ControlType type_;
> diff --git a/src/libcamera/controls.cpp b/src/libcamera/controls.cpp
> index 6a0d66fbea8d..f3d79785e6a8 100644
> --- a/src/libcamera/controls.cpp
> +++ b/src/libcamera/controls.cpp
> @@ -175,53 +175,6 @@ bool ControlValue::operator==(const ControlValue &other) const
> * \param[in] value The control value
> */
>
> -#ifndef __DOXYGEN__
> -template<>
> -bool ControlValue::get<bool>() const
> -{
> - ASSERT(type_ == ControlTypeBool);
> -
> - return bool_;
> -}
> -
> -template<>
> -int32_t ControlValue::get<int32_t>() const
> -{
> - ASSERT(type_ == ControlTypeInteger32);
> -
> - return integer32_;
> -}
> -
> -template<>
> -int64_t ControlValue::get<int64_t>() const
> -{
> - ASSERT(type_ == ControlTypeInteger64);
> -
> - return integer64_;
> -}
> -
> -template<>
> -void ControlValue::set<bool>(const bool &value)
> -{
> - type_ = ControlTypeBool;
> - bool_ = value;
> -}
> -
> -template<>
> -void ControlValue::set<int32_t>(const int32_t &value)
> -{
> - type_ = ControlTypeInteger32;
> - integer32_ = value;
> -}
> -
> -template<>
> -void ControlValue::set<int64_t>(const int64_t &value)
> -{
> - type_ = ControlTypeInteger64;
> - integer64_ = value;
> -}
> -#endif /* __DOXYGEN__ */
> -
> /**
> * \class ControlId
> * \brief Control static metadata
>
--
Regards
--
Kieran
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list