[libcamera-devel] [PATCH] qcam: Print whole stream configuration when adjusted

Kieran Bingham kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com
Thu Mar 26 09:56:42 CET 2020


Hi Laurent,

On 26/03/2020 01:35, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> When the validate() function adjusts the stream configuration, we print
> the adjusted size for debugging purpose. Switch to printing the whole
> configuration, as the pixel format may be useful too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> ---
>  src/qcam/main_window.cpp | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/qcam/main_window.cpp b/src/qcam/main_window.cpp
> index 565732698a5e..cf39ed7aceca 100644
> --- a/src/qcam/main_window.cpp
> +++ b/src/qcam/main_window.cpp
> @@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ int MainWindow::startCapture()
>  	config_ = camera_->generateConfiguration({ StreamRole::Viewfinder });
>  
>  	StreamConfiguration &cfg = config_->at(0);
> +
>  	if (options_.isSet(OptSize)) {
>  		const std::vector<OptionValue> &sizeOptions =
>  			options_[OptSize].toArray();
> @@ -316,10 +317,9 @@ int MainWindow::startCapture()
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (validation == CameraConfiguration::Adjusted) {
> -		qInfo() << "Stream size adjusted to"
> -			<< cfg.size.toString().c_str();
> -	}
> +	if (validation == CameraConfiguration::Adjusted)
> +		qInfo() << "Stream configuration adjusted to "
> +			<< cfg.toString().c_str();
>  


Should we make this same change in the pipelines validate() call too?
(as a separate patch from this I expect)

But for this patch,

Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com>

>  	ret = camera_->configure(config_.get());
>  	if (ret < 0) {
> 

-- 
Regards
--
Kieran


More information about the libcamera-devel mailing list