[libcamera-devel] [PATCH] libcamera: control_ids: Keep draft controls last
Jacopo Mondi
jacopo at jmondi.org
Mon Nov 23 10:29:50 CET 2020
Hi Kieran,
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 09:21:23AM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> On 23/11/2020 09:03, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > Let's try not to mix draft controls and regular controls.
> >
> > Keep draft controls at the end of the control_ids.yaml file and
> > add a comment to make clear where the draft controls section begins.
> >
>
> I won't directly object to this if you are concerned about the existing
> ordering - but it is not required to keep draft controls together.
>
> Changing a control from Draft to non-draft will not change it's
> underlying control id value/enum value - but moving them around the file
> will.
Well, that's not entirely true. Changing a control from draft to
non-draft might imply changing its values, we might even decide we
want to express with two or more controls what is now expressed with a
single one, or maybe merge two draft controls in a single one. Who
knows :)
>
>
> Of course, we're likely to hit re-ordering anyway, as we find ourselves
> refactoring draft controls ...
>
>
> Perhaps that's a good reason to keep draft controls at the end anyway.
> That way we won't affect the ID of any non-draft controls...
You know, I sent this out mostly for frivolous reasons ("all draft
controls shall go at the end of the file!"), but your point of having
'stable' controls first, with a non-changing ID has much more value,
even if we're not looking for ABI stability at this point.
>
> Acked-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com>
>
Thanks
j
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo at jmondi.org>
> > ---
> > src/libcamera/control_ids.yaml | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/libcamera/control_ids.yaml b/src/libcamera/control_ids.yaml
> > index c8874fa91965..a883e27e22e9 100644
> > --- a/src/libcamera/control_ids.yaml
> > +++ b/src/libcamera/control_ids.yaml
> > @@ -273,6 +273,22 @@ controls:
> >
> > size: [3x3]
> >
> > + - ScalerCrop:
> > + type: Rectangle
> > + description: |
> > + Sets the image portion that will be scaled to form the whole of
> > + the final output image. The (x,y) location of this rectangle is
> > + relative to the PixelArrayActiveAreas that is being used. The units
> > + remain native sensor pixels, even if the sensor is being used in
> > + a binning or skipping mode.
> > +
> > + This control is only present when the pipeline supports scaling. Its
> > + maximum valid value is given by the properties::ScalerCropMaximum
> > + property, and the two can be used to implement digital zoom.
> > +
> > + # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > + # Draft controls section
> > +
> > - AePrecaptureTrigger:
> > type: int32_t
> > draft: true
> > @@ -518,16 +534,4 @@ controls:
> > detection, additional format conversions etc) count as an additional
> > pipeline stage.
> >
> > - - ScalerCrop:
> > - type: Rectangle
> > - description: |
> > - Sets the image portion that will be scaled to form the whole of
> > - the final output image. The (x,y) location of this rectangle is
> > - relative to the PixelArrayActiveAreas that is being used. The units
> > - remain native sensor pixels, even if the sensor is being used in
> > - a binning or skipping mode.
> > -
> > - This control is only present when the pipeline supports scaling. Its
> > - maximum valid value is given by the properties::ScalerCropMaximum
> > - property, and the two can be used to implement digital zoom.
> > ...
> >
>
> --
> Regards
> --
> Kieran
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list