[libcamera-devel] [RFC 3/7] android: camera_device: Check correct stream format
Jacopo Mondi
jacopo at jmondi.org
Wed Sep 2 15:43:03 CEST 2020
Hi Kieran,
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 02:25:27PM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> On 02/09/2020 14:08, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > When iterating the camera3_stream_t received from the Android camera
> > framework to identify the MJPEG streams, the format check was performed
> > on the CameraStream created when iterating the non-MJPEG streams and not
> > on the format actually requested by Android.
> >
> > Fix this by checking the camera3_stream format.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo at jmondi.org>
> > ---
> > src/android/camera_device.cpp | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/android/camera_device.cpp b/src/android/camera_device.cpp
> > index 5a70db832aa5..01f4b3a45566 100644
> > --- a/src/android/camera_device.cpp
> > +++ b/src/android/camera_device.cpp
> > @@ -1230,9 +1230,10 @@ int CameraDevice::configureStreams(camera3_stream_configuration_t *stream_list)
> > /* Now handle MJPEG streams, adding a new stream if required. */
> > for (unsigned int i = 0; i < stream_list->num_streams; ++i) {
> > camera3_stream_t *stream = stream_list->streams[i];
> > + PixelFormat format = toPixelFormat(stream->format);
> > bool match = false;
> >
> > - if (streams_[i].format != formats::MJPEG)
>
> I'm not sure how it's the 'wrong' format to check. The
> CameraStream->format is already stored as a
> toPixelFormat(stream->format) isn't it ?
You are right, the Subject says "correct" which implies the existing
is wrong, which is not (assuming _BLOB -> MJPEG unconditionally).
You'll see in the next patches the real reason for this change is that
when this loop is entered after [5/7] is that there's not streams_[i]
anymore associated with BLOB streams, this prepares for it to be
removed safely. The commit message is a bit confused maybe.
>
>
> In the event of a JPEG stream - the CameraStream is created with
> formats::MJPEG ...
Yes, for now :) I see no reason why it should change, but..
>
>
> Even with that said, I don't think this patch is 'wrong', I just don't
> see the need.... but I see the story continues in the next patches...
>
Yes, hope it makes sense looking the next patches
>
> > + if (format != formats::MJPEG)
> > continue;
> >
> > /* Search for a compatible stream */
> >
>
> --
> Regards
> --
> Kieran
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list