[libcamera-devel] [PATCH v3 13/16] libcamera: raspberry: Report sensor timestamp
Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Mon Apr 26 07:04:37 CEST 2021
Hi Jacopo,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 06:03:16PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> Report the sensor's timestamp in the Request metadata by using the
> Unicam::Image buffer timestamp as an initial approximation.
>
> The buffer's timestamp is recorded at DMA-transfer time, and it does not
> theoretically matches the 'start of exposure' definition, but when used
> to compare two consecutive frames it gives an acceptable estimation of
> the sensor frame period duration.
>
> Reviewed-by: Naushir Patuck <naush at raspberrypi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo at jmondi.org>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> src/libcamera/pipeline/raspberrypi/raspberrypi.cpp | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/libcamera/pipeline/raspberrypi/raspberrypi.cpp b/src/libcamera/pipeline/raspberrypi/raspberrypi.cpp
> index 6c6d31f78c88..ac135f95de12 100644
> --- a/src/libcamera/pipeline/raspberrypi/raspberrypi.cpp
> +++ b/src/libcamera/pipeline/raspberrypi/raspberrypi.cpp
> @@ -1414,6 +1414,18 @@ void RPiCameraData::unicamBufferDequeue(FrameBuffer *buffer)
> << ", timestamp: " << buffer->metadata().timestamp;
>
> if (stream == &unicam_[Unicam::Image]) {
> + /*
> + * Record the sensor timestamp in the Request.
> + *
> + * \todo Do not assume the request in the front of the queue
> + * is the correct one
> + */
> + Request *request = requestQueue_.front();
> + ASSERT(request);
> +
> + request->metadata().set(controls::SensorTimestamp,
> + buffer->metadata().timestamp);
> +
> /*
> * Lookup the sensor controls used for this frame sequence from
> * DelayedControl and queue them along with the frame buffer.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list