[libcamera-devel] [PATCH 2/2] test: camera: Camera reconfiguration and fd-leak test

Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Wed Aug 18 04:14:54 CEST 2021


Hi Umang,

On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 08:30:34PM +0530, Umang Jain wrote:
> On 8/17/21 6:34 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 05:56:46PM +0530, Umang Jain wrote:
> >> This tests basically checks for two things:
> >> - Camera reconfigurations without stopping CameraManager
> >> - Fd leaks across IPA IPC boundary [1]
> >>
> >> Currently, it uses vimc, but can be easily changed to using another
> >> platform (for e.g. IPU3) by changing kCamId_ and kIpaProxyName_.
> >>
> >> The test performs kNumOfReconfigures_ (currently set to 10)
> >> reconfigurations of the camera. Each reconfiguration runs
> >> start(), capture(100ms), stop() of the camera. Hence, the test
> >> runs approximately for 1 second.
> >>
> >> For checking the fd leaks, the test monitors the /proc/$PROXY_PID/fd
> >> directory for open fds. It compares the number of open fds after each
> >> run to the number of open fds before the first run. If those two are
> >> found to be mis-matched, the test shall report failure.
> >>
> >> Since, the test needs to test the IPA IPC code paths, it is meant to
> >> always run with LIBCAMERA_IPA_FORCE_ISOLATION environment variable.
> >>
> >> [1] https://bugs.libcamera.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Umang Jain <umang.jain at ideasonboard.com>
> >> ---
> >>   test/camera/camera_reconfigure.cpp | 257 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   test/camera/meson.build            |   1 +
> >>   2 files changed, 258 insertions(+)
> >>   create mode 100644 test/camera/camera_reconfigure.cpp
> >>
> >> diff --git a/test/camera/camera_reconfigure.cpp b/test/camera/camera_reconfigure.cpp
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 00000000..b32264b1
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/test/camera/camera_reconfigure.cpp
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
> >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
> >> +/*
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2021, Google Inc.
> >> + *
> >> + * Test:
> >> + * - Camera's multiple reconfigurations without stopping CameraManager
> >> + * - leaking fds across IPA IPC boundary
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#include <dirent.h>
> >> +#include <iostream>
> >> +#include <fstream>
> >> +
> >> +#include <libcamera/framebuffer_allocator.h>
> >> +
> >> +#include <libcamera/base/event_dispatcher.h>
> >> +#include <libcamera/base/file.h>
> >> +#include <libcamera/base/thread.h>
> >> +#include <libcamera/base/timer.h>
> >> +
> >> +#include "camera_test.h"
> >> +#include "test.h"
> >> +
> >> +using namespace std;
> >> +
> >> +namespace {
> >> +
> >> +class CameraReconfigure : public CameraTest, public Test
> >> +{
> >> +public:
> >> +	CameraReconfigure()
> >> +		: CameraTest(kCamId_, true)
> >> +	{
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +private:
> >> +	static constexpr const char *kCamId_ = "platform/vimc.0 Sensor B";
> >> +	static constexpr const char *kIpaProxyName_ = "vimc_ipa_proxy";
> >> +	static constexpr unsigned int kNumOfReconfigures_ = 10;
> >> +
> >> +	void requestComplete(Request *request)
> >> +	{
> >> +		if (request->status() != Request::RequestComplete)
> >> +			return;
> >> +
> >> +		const Request::BufferMap &buffers = request->buffers();
> >> +
> >> +		/* Create a new request. */
> >> +		const Stream *stream = buffers.begin()->first;
> >> +		FrameBuffer *buffer = buffers.begin()->second;
> >> +
> >> +		request->reuse();
> >> +		request->addBuffer(stream, buffer);
> >> +		camera_->queueRequest(request);
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	int startAndStop()
> >> +	{
> >> +		StreamConfiguration &cfg = config_->at(0);
> >> +
> >> +		if (camera_->acquire()) {
> >> +			cerr << "Failed to acquire the camera" << endl;
> >> +			return TestFail;
> >> +		}
> >> +
> >> +		if (camera_->configure(config_.get())) {
> >> +			cerr << "Failed to set default configuration" << endl;
> >> +			return TestFail;
> >> +		}
> >> +
> >> +		Stream *stream = cfg.stream();
> >> +
> >> +		if (!allocated_) {
> >> +			int ret = allocator_->allocate(stream);
> >> +			if (ret < 0)
> >> +				return TestFail;
> >> +			allocated_ = true;
> >> +		}
> >> +
> >> +		for (const unique_ptr<FrameBuffer> &buffer : allocator_->buffers(stream)) {
> >> +			unique_ptr<Request> request = camera_->createRequest();
> >> +			if (!request) {
> >> +				cerr << "Failed to create request" << endl;
> >> +				return TestFail;
> >> +			}
> >> +
> >> +			if (request->addBuffer(stream, buffer.get())) {
> >> +				cerr << "Failed to associating buffer with request" << endl;
> >> +				return TestFail;
> >> +			}
> >> +
> >> +			requests_.push_back(move(request));
> >> +		}
> >> +
> >> +		camera_->requestCompleted.connect(this, &CameraReconfigure::requestComplete);
> >> +
> >> +		if (camera_->start()) {
> >> +			cerr << "Failed to start camera" << endl;
> >> +			return TestFail;
> >> +		}
> >> +
> >> +		for (unique_ptr<Request> &request : requests_) {
> >> +			if (camera_->queueRequest(request.get())) {
> >> +				cerr << "Failed to queue request" << endl;
> >> +				return TestFail;
> >> +			}
> >> +		}
> >> +
> >> +		EventDispatcher *dispatcher = Thread::current()->eventDispatcher();
> >> +
> >> +		Timer timer;
> >> +		timer.start(100);
> >> +		while (timer.isRunning())
> >> +			dispatcher->processEvents();
> >> +
> >> +		if (camera_->stop()) {
> >> +			cerr << "Failed to stop camera" << endl;
> >> +			return TestFail;
> >> +		}
> >> +
> >> +		if (camera_->release()) {
> >> +			cerr << "Failed to release camera" << endl;
> >> +			return TestFail;
> >> +		}
> >> +
> >> +		camera_->requestCompleted.disconnect(this, &CameraReconfigure::requestComplete);
> >> +
> >> +		requests_.clear();
> >> +
> >> +		return 0;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	int fdsOpen(pid_t pid)
> >> +	{
> >> +		string proxyFdPath = "/proc/" + to_string(pid) + "/fd";
> >> +		DIR *dir;
> >> +		struct dirent *ptr;
> >> +		unsigned int openFds = 0;
> >> +
> >> +		dir = opendir(proxyFdPath.c_str());
> >> +		if (dir == nullptr) {
> >> +			int err = errno;
> >> +			cerr << "Error opening " << proxyFdPath << ": "
> >> +			     << strerror(-err) << endl;
> >> +			return 0;
> >> +		}
> >> +
> >> +		while ((ptr = readdir(dir)) != nullptr) {
> >> +			if ((strcmp(ptr->d_name, ".") == 0) ||
> >> +			    (strcmp(ptr->d_name, "..") == 0))
> >> +				continue;
> >> +
> >> +			openFds++;
> >> +		}
> >> +		closedir(dir);
> >> +
> >> +		return openFds;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	pid_t findProxyPid()
> >> +	{
> >> +		string proxyPid;
> >> +		string proxyName(kIpaProxyName_);
> >> +		DIR *dir;
> >> +		struct dirent *ptr;
> >> +
> >> +		dir = opendir("/proc");
> >> +		while((ptr = readdir(dir)) != nullptr) {
> >> +			if(ptr->d_type != DT_DIR)
> >> +				continue;
> >> +
> >> +			string pname("/proc/" + string(ptr->d_name) + "/comm");
> >> +			if(File::exists(pname.c_str())) {
> > Missing space.
> 
> I failed to run checkstyle.py before sending, apologies. I hit -ENOSPC 
> on my primary device few days agp and I am ended up working on a adhoc 
> clone which didn't had the checkstyle.py as post-commit hook

No worries.

> > I may have missed it, but I haven't seen an answer to my review of the
> > previous version that proposed checking the number of open file
> > descriptors in the VIMC IPA module itself. That would test for fd leaks
> > in all tests using vimc, and wouldn't require finding child processes.
> 
> Coming to your request, the reply sounded to me as an enhancement in the 
> test-able VIMC in general, to increase our test coverage and IPC code 
> paths. I am assuming you don't intend to dis-regard this particular test 
> in favor of having it plumbed down to VIMC IPA, or is it? I am assuming 
> on my part that both can(or should) co-exist, latter being developed 
> along the lines and out of scope of this patch.

I was thinking that if we compute the number of open fds in the IPA
itself, then we could drop it from here. It would simplify the
implementation of this test, we wouldn't have to loop over /proc here
(which is the part that bothered me a bit, as I tried to see if there
was a C API to do this, and couldn't find any :-)), but only receive the
number of fds from the VIMC IPA through the FIFO that it uses to
communicate with tests.

Another option btw, now that I think about it, would be keep counting
fds here, but pass the VIMC IPA PID through the FIFO.

> Our priorities are well-addressed by this test for now, so maybe can I
> track it in bugzilla and come back to it in coming weeks?

That's OK with me.

> >> +				ifstream pfile(pname.c_str());
> >> +				string comm;
> >> +				getline (pfile, comm);
> >> +				pfile.close();
> >> +
> >> +				proxyPid = comm == proxyName ?
> >> +					   string(ptr->d_name) :
> >> +					   "";
> >> +			}
> >> +
> >> +			if (!proxyPid.empty())
> >> +				break;
> >> +		}
> >> +		closedir(dir);
> >> +
> >> +		if (!proxyPid.empty())
> >> +			return atoi(proxyPid.c_str());
> >> +
> >> +		return -1;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	int init() override
> >> +	{
> >> +		if (status_ != TestPass)
> >> +			return status_;
> >> +
> >> +		config_ = camera_->generateConfiguration({ StreamRole::StillCapture });
> >> +		if (!config_ || config_->size() != 1) {
> >> +			cerr << "Failed to generate default configuration" << endl;
> >> +			return TestFail;
> >> +		}
> >> +
> >> +		allocator_ = make_unique<FrameBufferAllocator>(camera_);
> >> +		allocated_ = false;
> >> +
> >> +		return TestPass;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	int run() override
> >> +	{
> >> +		unsigned int openFdsAtStart = 0;
> >> +		unsigned int openFds = 0;
> >> +
> >> +		pid_t proxyPid = findProxyPid();
> >> +		if (proxyPid < 0) {
> >> +			cerr << "Cannot find " << kIpaProxyName_
> >> +			     << " pid, exiting" << endl;
> >> +			return TestFail;
> >> +		}
> >> +
> >> +		openFdsAtStart = fdsOpen(proxyPid);
> >> +		for (unsigned int i = 0; i < kNumOfReconfigures_; i++) {
> >> +			startAndStop();
> >> +			openFds = fdsOpen(proxyPid);
> >> +			if (openFds == 0) {
> >> +				cerr << "No open fds found whereas "
> >> +				     << "open fds at start: " << openFdsAtStart
> >> +				     << endl;
> >> +				return TestFail;
> >> +			}
> >> +
> >> +			if (openFds != openFdsAtStart) {
> >> +				cerr << "Leaking fds for " << kIpaProxyName_
> >> +				     << " - Open fds: " << openFds << " vs "
> >> +				     << "Open fds at start: " << openFdsAtStart
> >> +				     << endl;
> >> +				return TestFail;
> >> +			}
> >> +		}
> >> +
> >> +		return TestPass;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >> +	bool allocated_;
> >> +
> >> +	vector<unique_ptr<Request>> requests_;
> >> +
> >> +	unique_ptr<CameraConfiguration> config_;
> >> +	unique_ptr<FrameBufferAllocator> allocator_;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +} /* namespace */
> >> +
> >> +TEST_REGISTER(CameraReconfigure)
> >> diff --git a/test/camera/meson.build b/test/camera/meson.build
> >> index 002a87b5..668d5c03 100644
> >> --- a/test/camera/meson.build
> >> +++ b/test/camera/meson.build
> >> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ camera_tests = [
> >>       ['buffer_import',           'buffer_import.cpp'],
> >>       ['statemachine',            'statemachine.cpp'],
> >>       ['capture',                 'capture.cpp'],
> >> +    ['camera_reconfigure',      'camera_reconfigure.cpp'],
> >>   ]
> >>   
> >>   foreach t : camera_tests

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


More information about the libcamera-devel mailing list