[libcamera-devel] [PATCH 2/2] android: libyuv: Introduce PostProcessorLibyuv
Kieran Bingham
kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com
Fri Jan 22 14:05:32 CET 2021
Hi Hiro,
When there's more than one patch, could you also add a cover letter
please? it helps grouping them, and provides a way to comment on the
whole series as well as individual patches.
It doesn't have to be extensive, just a title and a brief.
I'm happy to see this work being done, but there's no usage of this post
processor.
Do you have another patch in progress to do that which would become a
part of this series?
On 22/01/2021 09:23, Hirokazu Honda wrote:
> This adds PostProcessorLibyuv. It supports NV12 buffer scaling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hirokazu Honda <hiroh at chromium.org>
> ---
> src/android/libyuv/post_processor_libyuv.cpp | 120 +++++++++++++++++++
> src/android/libyuv/post_processor_libyuv.h | 33 +++++
> src/android/meson.build | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 154 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 src/android/libyuv/post_processor_libyuv.cpp
> create mode 100644 src/android/libyuv/post_processor_libyuv.h
>
> diff --git a/src/android/libyuv/post_processor_libyuv.cpp b/src/android/libyuv/post_processor_libyuv.cpp
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..7cfa0539
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/src/android/libyuv/post_processor_libyuv.cpp
> @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2021, Google Inc.
> + *
> + * post_processor_libyuv.cpp - Post Processor using libyuv
> + */
> +
> +#include "post_processor_libyuv.h"
> +
> +#include <libyuv/scale.h>
> +
> +#include <libcamera/formats.h>
> +#include <libcamera/geometry.h>
> +#include <libcamera/internal/formats.h>
> +#include <libcamera/internal/log.h>
> +#include <libcamera/pixel_format.h>
> +
> +using namespace libcamera;
> +
> +LOG_DEFINE_CATEGORY(LIBYUV)
> +
> +namespace {
> +void getNV12Length(Size size, unsigned int length[2])
> +{
> + auto nv12Info = PixelFormatInfo::info(PixelFormat(formats::NV12));
> + for (unsigned int i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> + const unsigned int vertSubSample =
> + nv12Info.planes[i].verticalSubSampling;
> + length[i] = nv12Info.stride(size.width, i, /*align=*/1) *
> + ((size.height + vertSubSample - 1) / vertSubSample);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +unsigned int getNV12Stride(Size size, unsigned int i)
> +{
> + auto nv12Info = PixelFormatInfo::info(PixelFormat(formats::NV12));
> + return nv12Info.stride(size.width, i, 1);
> +}
> +} // namespace
> +
> +PostProcessorLibyuv::PostProcessorLibyuv() = default;
> +
> +int PostProcessorLibyuv::configure(const StreamConfiguration &inCfg,
> + const StreamConfiguration &outCfg)
> +{
> + if (inCfg.pixelFormat != outCfg.pixelFormat ||
> + inCfg.size < outCfg.size) {
> + LOG(LIBYUV, Error) << "Only down-scaling is supported";
This will report "Only down-scaling is supported" if someone tries to
use it to do pixel format conversion.
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + if (inCfg.pixelFormat == formats::NV12) {
> + LOG(LIBYUV, Error) << "Only NV12 is supported";
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + inCfg_ = inCfg;
> + outCfg_ = outCfg;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int PostProcessorLibyuv::process(const FrameBuffer &source,
> + libcamera::MappedBuffer *destination,
> + CameraMetadata * /*metadata*/)
> +{
> + if (!IsValidNV12Buffers(source, *destination)) {
> + LOG(LIBYUV, Error) << "Invalid source and destination";
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + const MappedFrameBuffer sourceMapped(&source, PROT_READ);
> + if (!sourceMapped.isValid()) {
> + LOG(LIBYUV, Error) << "Failed to mmap camera frame buffer";
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0 == libyuv::NV12Scale(sourceMapped.maps()[0].data(),
> + getNV12Stride(inCfg_.size, 0),
> + sourceMapped.maps()[1].data(),
> + getNV12Stride(inCfg_.size, 1),
> + inCfg_.size.height, inCfg_.size.width,
> + destination->maps()[0].data(),
> + getNV12Stride(outCfg_.size, 0),
> + destination->maps()[1].data(),
> + getNV12Stride(outCfg_.size, 1),
> + outCfg_.size.width, outCfg_.size.height,
> + libyuv::FilterMode::kFilterBilinear);
Eeek, that's quite terse to read, but that's more of a restriction on
the libyuv() I expect.
> +}
> +
> +bool PostProcessorLibyuv::IsValidNV12Buffers(
> + const FrameBuffer &source,
> + const libcamera::MappedBuffer &destination) const
> +{
> + if (source.planes().size() != 2u) {
> + LOG(LIBYUV, Error) << "The number of source planes is not 2";
> + return false;
> + }
> + if (destination.maps().size() != 2u) {
> + LOG(LIBYUV, Error)
> + << "The number of destination planes is not 2";
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + unsigned int sourceLength[2] = {};
> + unsigned int destinationLength[2] = {};
> + getNV12Length(inCfg_.size, sourceLength);
> + getNV12Length(outCfg_.size, destinationLength);
I think these can be calculated once at configure() time rather than in
every frame.
> +
> + if (source.planes()[0].length < sourceLength[0] ||
> + source.planes()[1].length < sourceLength[1]) {
> + LOG(LIBYUV, Error)
> + << "The source planes lengths are too small";
> + return false;
> + }
I would expect that we have an element of 'we can trust the sizes of a
FrameBuffer()' ?
> + if (destination.maps()[0].size() < destinationLength[0] ||
> + destination.maps()[1].size() < destinationLength[1]) {
> + LOG(LIBYUV, Error)
> + << "The destination planes lengths are too small";
> + return false;
> + }
new line here.
That's a lot of checks for each buffer. Do we need to do that on every
buffer? I suspect we might need to because we don't know what buffers
we're given before they come in ...
But I wonder if we can make assumptions that they are accurate.
> + return true;
> +}
> diff --git a/src/android/libyuv/post_processor_libyuv.h b/src/android/libyuv/post_processor_libyuv.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..860a664b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/src/android/libyuv/post_processor_libyuv.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: LGPL-2.1-or-later */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2021, Google Inc.
> + *
> + * post_processor_libyuv.h - Post Processor using libyuv
> + */
> +#ifndef __ANDROID_POST_PROCESSOR_LIBYUV_H__
> +#define __ANDROID_POST_PROCESSOR_LIBYUV_H__
> +
> +#include "../post_processor.h"
> +
> +class CameraDevice;
> +
> +class PostProcessorLibyuv : public PostProcessor
> +{
> +public:
> + PostProcessorLibyuv();
> +
> + int configure(const libcamera::StreamConfiguration &incfg,
> + const libcamera::StreamConfiguration &outcfg) override;
> + int process(const libcamera::FrameBuffer &source,
> + libcamera::MappedBuffer *destination,
> + CameraMetadata *metadata) override;
> +
> +private:
> + bool IsValidNV12Buffers(const libcamera::FrameBuffer &source,
> + const libcamera::MappedBuffer &destination) const;
> +
> + libcamera::StreamConfiguration inCfg_;
> + libcamera::StreamConfiguration outCfg_;
> +};
> +
> +#endif /* __ANDROID_POST_PROCESSOR_LIBYUV_H__ */
> diff --git a/src/android/meson.build b/src/android/meson.build
> index 3d4d3be4..ff067d12 100644
> --- a/src/android/meson.build
> +++ b/src/android/meson.build
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ android_hal_sources = files([
> 'jpeg/exif.cpp',
> 'jpeg/post_processor_jpeg.cpp',
> 'jpeg/thumbnailer.cpp',
> + 'libyuv/post_processor_libyuv.cpp'
> ])
>
> android_camera_metadata_sources = files([
> --
> 2.30.0.280.ga3ce27912f-goog
> _______________________________________________
> libcamera-devel mailing list
> libcamera-devel at lists.libcamera.org
> https://lists.libcamera.org/listinfo/libcamera-devel
>
--
Regards
--
Kieran
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list