[libcamera-devel] [PATCH v4 1/7] libcamera: delayed_controls: Add notion of priority write
Kieran Bingham
kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com
Fri Mar 12 15:22:41 CET 2021
On 12/03/2021 14:04, Naushir Patuck wrote:
> Hi Kieran,
>
> Thank you for your review feedback.
>
> b/src/libcamera/delayed_controls.cpp
> >>> index ab1d40057c5f..3ed1dfebd035 100644
> >>> --- a/src/libcamera/delayed_controls.cpp
> >>> +++ b/src/libcamera/delayed_controls.cpp
> >>> @@ -40,15 +40,19 @@ LOG_DEFINE_CATEGORY(DelayedControls)
> >>> /**
> >>> * \brief Construct a DelayedControls instance
> >>> * \param[in] device The V4L2 device the controls have to be
> applied to
> >>> - * \param[in] delays Map of the numerical V4L2 control ids to
> their associated
> >>> - * delays (in frames)
> >>> + * \param[in] controlParams Map of the numerical V4L2 control
> ids to their
> >>> + * associated control parameters.
> >>> *
> >>> - * Only controls specified in \a delays are handled. If it's
> desired to mix
> >>> - * delayed controls and controls that take effect immediately
> the immediate
> >>> - * controls must be listed in the \a delays map with a delay
> value of 0.
> >>> + * The control parameters comprise of delays (in frames) and a
> priority write
> >>> + * flag. If this flag is set, the relevant control is written
> separately from,
> >>> + * ahead of the reset of the batched controls.
> >
> > minor:
> >
> > 'and ahead of' ?
> >
> > could be fixed while applying if there's nothing else major:
>
>
> Could you confirm if this is correct to say 'and ahead of the reset of'
> or if it was supposed to be 'and ahead of the rest of' ...
>
>
> 'separately from, and ahead of the rest of` should be the correct term
> here :)
>
Aha great.
> Happy for you to fix while applying if it is convenient for you.
Done and pushed.
--
Thanks
Kieran
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list