[libcamera-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] cam: Do not assume Location is available
Jacopo Mondi
jacopo at jmondi.org
Sun Mar 21 14:36:22 CET 2021
Hi Laurent,
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 10:55:07PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 02:01:18PM +0100, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > In preparation to register the Location property only if the firware
> > interface provides it, do not assume it is available and build the
> > camera name using the camera sensor model as a fallback.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo at jmondi.org>
> > ---
> > src/cam/main.cpp | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/cam/main.cpp b/src/cam/main.cpp
> > index e01be63a7058..c087cdd97332 100644
> > --- a/src/cam/main.cpp
> > +++ b/src/cam/main.cpp
> > @@ -379,18 +379,26 @@ std::string const CamApp::cameraName(const Camera *camera)
> > const ControlList &props = camera->properties();
> > std::string name;
> >
> > - switch (props.get(properties::Location)) {
> > - case properties::CameraLocationFront:
> > - name = "Internal front camera";
> > - break;
> > - case properties::CameraLocationBack:
> > - name = "Internal back camera";
> > - break;
> > - case properties::CameraLocationExternal:
> > - name = "External camera";
> > - if (props.contains(properties::Model))
> > - name += " '" + props.get(properties::Model) + "'";
> > - break;
> > + if (props.contains(properties::Location)) {
> > + switch (props.get(properties::Location)) {
> > + case properties::CameraLocationFront:
> > + name = "Internal front camera";
> > + break;
> > + case properties::CameraLocationBack:
> > + name = "Internal back camera";
> > + break;
> > + case properties::CameraLocationExternal:
> > + name = "External camera";
> > + if (props.contains(properties::Model))
> > + name += " '" + props.get(properties::Model) + "'";
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + } else if (props.contains(properties::Model)) {
> > + /*
> > + * If the camera location is not availble use the camera model
> > + * to build the camera name.
> > + */
> > + name = "'" + props.get(properties::Model) + "'";
> > }
> >
> > name += " (" + camera->id() + ")";
>
> If none of the conditions above is true, there will be an extra space.
Isn't the Model property always registered by the CameraSensor class ?
> I initially thought utils::join() could be useful here, but that's not a
> public API :-S This could be an option, I'm sure there are other equally
> valid or better solutions.
>
> diff --git a/src/cam/main.cpp b/src/cam/main.cpp
> index e01be63a7058..3adfe2c34969 100644
> --- a/src/cam/main.cpp
> +++ b/src/cam/main.cpp
> @@ -377,23 +377,34 @@ int CamApp::run()
> std::string const CamApp::cameraName(const Camera *camera)
> {
> const ControlList &props = camera->properties();
> + bool addModel = true;
> std::string name;
>
> - switch (props.get(properties::Location)) {
> - case properties::CameraLocationFront:
> - name = "Internal front camera";
> - break;
> - case properties::CameraLocationBack:
> - name = "Internal back camera";
> - break;
> - case properties::CameraLocationExternal:
> - name = "External camera";
> - if (props.contains(properties::Model))
> - name += " '" + props.get(properties::Model) + "'";
> - break;
> + /*
> + * Construct the name from the camera location, model and ID. The model
> + * is only used if the location isn't present or is set to External.
> + */
> +
> + if (props.contains(properties::Location)) {
> + switch (props.get(properties::Location)) {
> + case properties::CameraLocationFront:
> + name = "Internal front camera ";
> + addModel = false;
> + break;
> + case properties::CameraLocationBack:2
> + name = "Internal back camera ";
> + addModel = false;
> + break;
> + case properties::CameraLocationExternal:
> + name = "External camera ";
> + break;
> + }
> }
>
> - name += " (" + camera->id() + ")";
> + if (addModel && props.contains(properties::Model))
> + name += "'" + props.get(properties::Model) + "' ";
> +
> + name += "(" + camera->id() + ")";
>
> return name;
> }
>
> It's a detail, and regardless of what option you pick,
Anyway, using an addModel flag would make the code more readable so
I'll refactor.
>
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
>
Thanks
j
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list