[libcamera-devel] [PATCH v4 4/4] ipu3: ipa: Allow IPA to apply controls to the lens device
Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Wed Nov 24 10:20:39 CET 2021
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 09:10:10AM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> On 24/11/2021 05:56, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Han-lin,
> >
> > (CC'ing Dan)
> >
> > Thank you for the patch.
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 08:37:51PM +0800, Han-Lin Chen wrote:
> >> Allow IPA to apply controls to the lens device.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Han-Lin Chen <hanlinchen at chromium.org>
> >> ---
> >> src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/cio2.cpp | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/cio2.h | 3 +++
> >> src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/ipu3.cpp | 12 ++++++++++--
> >> 3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/cio2.cpp b/src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/cio2.cpp
> >> index 59dda56b..59b2f586 100644
> >> --- a/src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/cio2.cpp
> >> +++ b/src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/cio2.cpp
> >> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> >> #include <libcamera/geometry.h>
> >> #include <libcamera/stream.h>
> >>
> >> +#include "libcamera/internal/camera_lens.h"
> >> #include "libcamera/internal/camera_sensor.h"
> >> #include "libcamera/internal/framebuffer.h"
> >> #include "libcamera/internal/media_device.h"
> >> @@ -159,6 +160,34 @@ int CIO2Device::init(const MediaDevice *media, unsigned int index)
> >> return -EINVAL;
> >> }
> >>
> >> + /*
> >> + * \todo Read the lens model from the sensor itself or from a device
> >> + * database. For now use default values taken from ChromeOS database.
> >> + */
> >> + static std::unordered_map<std::string, std::string> sensorLens = {
> >> + { "ov13858", "dw9714" },
> >> + { "imx258", "dw9807" },
> >> + { "imx355", "ak7375" }
> >> + };
> > Dan, could you share your patches to add an ancillary link between the
> > imaging sensor and the lens controller with Han-lin once they're ready ?
> > This is what we should use here, and Han-lin could help testing them on
> > Chrome OS (which uses different ACPI bindings for the CIO2).
>
> Actually, that spurs a thought; we're getting the VCM to match to the
> Sensor by using the lens-focus property in the cio2-bridge...but is the
> ChromeOS ACPI going to be supplying that?
Likely not out-of-the-box at the moment. This is why I'd like Han-lin to
get the patches for testing, to figure out what needs to be done on
Chrome OS.
> >> +
> >> + auto it = sensorLens.find(sensor_->model());
> >> + if (it != sensorLens.end()) {
> >> + const std::vector<MediaEntity *> &entities = media->entities();
> >> + for (auto ent : entities) {
> >> + if (ent->function() == MEDIA_ENT_F_LENS) {
> >> + lens_ = std::make_unique<CameraLens>(ent);
> >> + ret = lens_->init();
> >> + if (!ret && lens_->model() == it->second) {
> >> + break;
> >> + }
> >> + lens_.reset();
> >> + }
> >> + if (!lens_)
> >> + LOG(IPU3, Warning) << "Lens device "
> >> + << it->second << " not found";
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> /*
> >> * \todo Define when to open and close video device nodes, as they
> >> * might impact on power consumption.
> >> diff --git a/src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/cio2.h b/src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/cio2.h
> >> index ba8f0052..635566c8 100644
> >> --- a/src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/cio2.h
> >> +++ b/src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/cio2.h
> >> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> >>
> >> namespace libcamera {
> >>
> >> +class CameraLens;
> >> class CameraSensor;
> >> class FrameBuffer;
> >> class MediaDevice;
> >> @@ -52,6 +53,7 @@ public:
> >> int stop();
> >>
> >> CameraSensor *sensor() { return sensor_.get(); }
> >> + CameraLens *lens() { return lens_.get(); }
> >> const CameraSensor *sensor() const { return sensor_.get(); }
> >>
> >> FrameBuffer *queueBuffer(Request *request, FrameBuffer *rawBuffer);
> >> @@ -67,6 +69,7 @@ private:
> >> void cio2BufferReady(FrameBuffer *buffer);
> >>
> >> std::unique_ptr<CameraSensor> sensor_;
> >> + std::unique_ptr<CameraLens> lens_;
> >> std::unique_ptr<V4L2Subdevice> csi2_;
> >> std::unique_ptr<V4L2VideoDevice> output_;
> >>
> >> diff --git a/src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/ipu3.cpp b/src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/ipu3.cpp
> >> index c65afdb2..6e04ec8f 100644
> >> --- a/src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/ipu3.cpp
> >> +++ b/src/libcamera/pipeline/ipu3/ipu3.cpp
> >> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> >> #include <libcamera/stream.h>
> >>
> >> #include "libcamera/internal/camera.h"
> >> +#include "libcamera/internal/camera_lens.h"
> >> #include "libcamera/internal/camera_sensor.h"
> >> #include "libcamera/internal/delayed_controls.h"
> >> #include "libcamera/internal/device_enumerator.h"
> >> @@ -1238,8 +1239,15 @@ void IPU3CameraData::queueFrameAction(unsigned int id,
> >> {
> >> switch (action.op) {
> >> case ipa::ipu3::ActionSetSensorControls: {
> >> - const ControlList &controls = action.sensorControls;
> >> - delayedCtrls_->push(controls);
> >> + const ControlList &sensorControls = action.sensorControls;
> >> + delayedCtrls_->push(sensorControls);
> >> +
> >> + const ControlList lensControls = action.lensControls;
> >> + const ControlValue &focusValue =
> >> + lensControls.get(V4L2_CID_FOCUS_ABSOLUTE);
> >> + if (!focusValue.isNone() && cio2_.lens())
> >> + cio2_.lens()->setFocusPostion(focusValue.get<int32_t>());
> >> +
> >
> > The other way around, should we pass the limits of the focus control
> > from the pipeline handler to the IPA ?
> >
> >> break;
> >> }
> >> case ipa::ipu3::ActionParamFilled: {
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list