[libcamera-devel] [PATCH v6 4/7] libcamera: Support passing ColorSpaces to V4L2 video devices

David Plowman david.plowman at raspberrypi.com
Thu Nov 25 21:38:25 CET 2021


Hi Jacopo

Thanks for the suggestions.

On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 17:18, Jacopo Mondi <jacopo at jmondi.org> wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>    one more comment and a reply
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 04:36:40PM +0000, David Plowman wrote:
> > Hi Jacopo
> >
> > Thanks for looking at this!
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Nov 2021 at 23:42, Jacopo Mondi <jacopo at jmondi.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 03:19:30PM +0000, David Plowman wrote:
> > > > The ColorSpace from the StreamConfiguration is now handled
> > > > appropriately in the V4L2VideoDevice.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: David Plowman <david.plowman at raspberrypi.com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  include/libcamera/internal/v4l2_videodevice.h |  2 +
> > > >  src/libcamera/v4l2_videodevice.cpp            | 53 +++++++++++++++++--
> > > >  2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/libcamera/internal/v4l2_videodevice.h b/include/libcamera/internal/v4l2_videodevice.h
> > > > index a1c458e4..00bc50e7 100644
> > > > --- a/include/libcamera/internal/v4l2_videodevice.h
> > > > +++ b/include/libcamera/internal/v4l2_videodevice.h
> > > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> > > >  #include <libcamera/base/log.h>
> > > >  #include <libcamera/base/signal.h>
> > > >
> > > > +#include <libcamera/color_space.h>
> > > >  #include <libcamera/framebuffer.h>
> > > >  #include <libcamera/geometry.h>
> > > >  #include <libcamera/pixel_format.h>
> > > > @@ -167,6 +168,7 @@ public:
> > > >
> > > >       V4L2PixelFormat fourcc;
> > > >       Size size;
> > > > +     std::optional<ColorSpace> colorSpace;
> > > >
> > > >       std::array<Plane, 3> planes;
> > > >       unsigned int planesCount = 0;
> > > > diff --git a/src/libcamera/v4l2_videodevice.cpp b/src/libcamera/v4l2_videodevice.cpp
> > > > index 4f04212d..e03ff8b5 100644
> > > > --- a/src/libcamera/v4l2_videodevice.cpp
> > > > +++ b/src/libcamera/v4l2_videodevice.cpp
> > > > @@ -370,17 +370,27 @@ bool V4L2BufferCache::Entry::operator==(const FrameBuffer &buffer) const
> > > >   * \brief The plane line stride (in bytes)
> > > >   */
> > > >
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * \var V4L2DeviceFormat::fourcc
> > > > + * \brief The fourcc code describing the pixel encoding scheme
> > > > + *
> > > > + * The fourcc code, as defined by the V4L2 API with the V4L2_PIX_FMT_* macros,
> > > > + * that identifies the image format pixel encoding scheme.
> > > > + */
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Nice that the uncomplete documentation about color spaces has been
> > > dropped, but why moving the documentation block above ? Please keep
> > > the same order as the declaration order in the header file.
> > >
> > > It will also make it easier to diff it during review.
> > >
> > > >  /**
> > > >   * \var V4L2DeviceFormat::size
> > > >   * \brief The image size in pixels
> > > >   */
> > > >
> > > >  /**
> > > > - * \var V4L2DeviceFormat::fourcc
> > > > - * \brief The fourcc code describing the pixel encoding scheme
> > > > + * \var V4L2DeviceFormat::colorSpace
> > > > + * \brief The color space of the pixels
> > > >   *
> > > > - * The fourcc code, as defined by the V4L2 API with the V4L2_PIX_FMT_* macros,
> > > > - * that identifies the image format pixel encoding scheme.
> > > > + * The color space of the image. When setting the format this may be
> > > > + * unset, in which case the driver gets to use its default color space.
> > > > + * After being set, this value should contain the color space that the
> > >
> > > s/that the/that ?
> > >
> > > > + * was actually used.
> > > >   */
> > > >
> > > >  /**
> > > > @@ -879,6 +889,10 @@ int V4L2VideoDevice::getFormatMultiplane(V4L2DeviceFormat *format)
> > > >       format->fourcc = V4L2PixelFormat(pix->pixelformat);
> > > >       format->planesCount = pix->num_planes;
> > > >
> > > > +     format->colorSpace = toColorSpace(*pix);
> > > > +     if (!format->colorSpace)
> > > > +             LOG(V4L2, Error) << "Retrieved unrecognised color space";
> > > > +
> > > >       for (unsigned int i = 0; i < format->planesCount; ++i) {
> > > >               format->planes[i].bpl = pix->plane_fmt[i].bytesperline;
> > > >               format->planes[i].size = pix->plane_fmt[i].sizeimage;
> > > > @@ -893,6 +907,9 @@ int V4L2VideoDevice::trySetFormatMultiplane(V4L2DeviceFormat *format, bool set)
> > > >       struct v4l2_pix_format_mplane *pix = &v4l2Format.fmt.pix_mp;
> > > >       int ret;
> > > >
> > > > +     if (!format->colorSpace)
> > > > +             LOG(V4L2, Warning) << "Setting undefined color space";
> > > > +
> > > >       v4l2Format.type = bufferType_;
> > > >       pix->width = format->size.width;
> > > >       pix->height = format->size.height;
> > > > @@ -900,6 +917,12 @@ int V4L2VideoDevice::trySetFormatMultiplane(V4L2DeviceFormat *format, bool set)
> > > >       pix->num_planes = format->planesCount;
> > > >       pix->field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
> > > >
> > > > +     ret = fromColorSpace(format->colorSpace, *pix);
>
> Looking at how this is used it really looks like this could be called
>
>             ret = fillV4L2ColorSpace(pix, format->colorSpace);
>
> > > > +     if (ret < 0)
> > > > +             LOG(V4L2, Warning)
> > > > +                     << "Setting color space unrecognised by V4L2: "
> > > > +                     << ColorSpace::toString(format->colorSpace);
> > > > +
> > > >       ASSERT(pix->num_planes <= std::size(pix->plane_fmt));
> > > >
> > > >       for (unsigned int i = 0; i < pix->num_planes; ++i) {
> > > > @@ -928,6 +951,10 @@ int V4L2VideoDevice::trySetFormatMultiplane(V4L2DeviceFormat *format, bool set)
> > > >               format->planes[i].size = pix->plane_fmt[i].sizeimage;
> > > >       }
> > > >
> > > > +     format->colorSpace = toColorSpace(*pix);
> > > > +     if (!format->colorSpace)
> > > > +             LOG(V4L2, Warning) << "Unrecognised color space has been set";
> > > > +
> > >
> > > Does colorspace handling stricly have to be tied to format
> > > configuration ? This would lead to undesired side effects, like the metadata pad
> > > being poked for colorspace and complaining as it doesn't really have
> > > one.
> > >
> > > Should colorspace configuration be achieved with dedicated functions
> > > in the V4L2*Device classes so that pipeline handlers know what devices
> > > to apply/retrieve colorspace from, like they do with formats ?
> >
> > Yes, there is a problem here that I talked about in one of the earlier
> > revisions. Actually it's only an issue for subdevices, so you might
> > notice that there's a "todo" in v4l2_subdevice.cpp getFormat.
> >
> > The problem is that I end up trying to convert the colour space on a
> > metadata pad - and of course that doesn't work. Nothing breaks, you
>
> I'm aware of the issue and it means to me the implemented API falls a
> bit short if it causes annoyances with a standard use case like this
> one.
>
> My proposal was to leave set/getFormat() in their current version in
> V4L2VideoDevice and V4L2Subdevice and add a new setColorSpace() or
> similar which the pipeline handlers would be in charge to call on
> the devices it consider appropriate.
>
> This would separate the ColorSpace configuration from the image format
> configuration. In V4L2 they go through the same IOCTL and the same
> structure, but if that doesn't work well for us we can deviate from
> it.
>
> Also looking at how colorspaces are validated in your last patch
>
>                 int ret = dev->tryFormat(&format);
>                 if (ret)
>                         return Invalid;
> +               if (!format.colorSpace || cfg.colorSpace != format.colorSpace) {
> +                       status = Adjusted;
> +                       LOG(RPI, Warning)
> +                               << "Color space changed from "
> +                               << ColorSpace::toString(cfg.colorSpace) << " to "
> +                               << ColorSpace::toString(format.colorSpace);
> +               }
> +               cfg.colorSpace = format.colorSpace;
>
> This really seems like it could be
>
>                 int ret = dev->tryFormat(&format);
>                 if (ret)
>                         return Invalid;
>
>                 ret = dev->setColorSpace(cfg.colorSpace);
>                 if (cfg.colorSpace != dev->getColorSpace()) {
>                         status = Adjusted;
>                         cfg.colorSpace = dev->getColorSpace();
>                 }
>
>
> True, setting an image format resets the colorspace maybe but I think
> it's fine as long as it is documented.
>
> If in the setColorSpace() function you need a v4l2_format you can use
> the currently applied format. Of course you would need to add the
> single planar/multiplanar V4L2 API behind the single setColorSpace()
> function.
>
> In my mental picture there's nothing that prevents this from being
> implemented (not that I'm saying it's a good idea, but it's doable at
> last), am I wrong ?

So I agree that it could be done like this, but I guess the following
things bother me a bit.

Mainly it seems more complicated (you have to do 2 things all the
time, not just one -  source of bugs right there). It confounds
existing expectations about V4L2 - why confuse people who thought they
knew how V4L2 works? This is a "helpful C++ layer" on top of V4L2,
right? And the actual mechanics of splitting this up - every "set"
operation becomes a "query-first-then-set"- is not lovely.

Actually I think there's a perfectly good solution which is simply to
let the caller check the result. I know I get obsessed about colour
spaces, but apparently not everyone does! This way everyone gets what
they want. I can check. Others can check if they want. All problems
solved.

David

>
> > just get a warning message. I'm open to suggestions on how to resolve
> > this. An extra parameter to the get/setFormat ("I am not an image data
> > pad"?). Separate functions get/setImageFormat and
> > get/setMetadataFormat? Rely on the caller to check for a bad colour
> > space? (but will they bother?)
> >
> > Thoughts, anyone?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > David
> >
> > >
> > > >       return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -951,6 +978,10 @@ int V4L2VideoDevice::getFormatSingleplane(V4L2DeviceFormat *format)
> > > >       format->planes[0].bpl = pix->bytesperline;
> > > >       format->planes[0].size = pix->sizeimage;
> > > >
> > > > +     format->colorSpace = toColorSpace(*pix);
> > > > +     if (!format->colorSpace)
> > > > +             LOG(V4L2, Error) << "Retrieved unrecognised color space";
> > > > +
> > > >       return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -960,12 +991,22 @@ int V4L2VideoDevice::trySetFormatSingleplane(V4L2DeviceFormat *format, bool set)
> > > >       struct v4l2_pix_format *pix = &v4l2Format.fmt.pix;
> > > >       int ret;
> > > >
> > > > +     if (!format->colorSpace)
> > > > +             LOG(V4L2, Error) << "Trying to set unrecognised color space";
> > > > +
> > > >       v4l2Format.type = bufferType_;
> > > >       pix->width = format->size.width;
> > > >       pix->height = format->size.height;
> > > >       pix->pixelformat = format->fourcc;
> > > >       pix->bytesperline = format->planes[0].bpl;
> > > >       pix->field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
> > > > +
> > > > +     ret = fromColorSpace(format->colorSpace, *pix);
> > > > +     if (ret < 0)
> > > > +             LOG(V4L2, Warning)
> > > > +                     << "Set color space unrecognised by V4L2: "
> > > > +                     << ColorSpace::toString(format->colorSpace);
> > > > +
> > > >       ret = ioctl(set ? VIDIOC_S_FMT : VIDIOC_TRY_FMT, &v4l2Format);
> > > >       if (ret) {
> > > >               LOG(V4L2, Error)
> > > > @@ -985,6 +1026,10 @@ int V4L2VideoDevice::trySetFormatSingleplane(V4L2DeviceFormat *format, bool set)
> > > >       format->planes[0].bpl = pix->bytesperline;
> > > >       format->planes[0].size = pix->sizeimage;
> > > >
> > > > +     format->colorSpace = toColorSpace(*pix);
> > > > +     if (!format->colorSpace)
> > > > +             LOG(V4L2, Error) << "Undefined color space has been set";
> > > > +
> > > >       return 0;
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.20.1
> > > >


More information about the libcamera-devel mailing list