[libcamera-devel] [PATCH 5/6] pipeline: raspberrypi: Account for a missing Unicam embedded data node
Naushir Patuck
naush at raspberrypi.com
Fri Oct 22 15:31:38 CEST 2021
Hi David,
Thank you for your feedback.
On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 14:18, David Plowman <david.plowman at raspberrypi.com>
wrote:
> Hi Naush
>
> Thanks for this patch.
>
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2021 at 12:55, Naushir Patuck <naush at raspberrypi.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > The unicam driver no longer regesters an embedded data node if the
> sensor does
> > not provide this stream. Account for this in the pipeline handler match
> routine
> > by not assuming it is always present.
> >
> > Add a warning if Unicam and the CamHelper do not agree on the presense
> of sensor
> > embedded data, and disable its useage in these cases.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Naushir Patuck <naush at raspberrypi.com>
> > ---
> > .../pipeline/raspberrypi/raspberrypi.cpp | 16 +++++++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/libcamera/pipeline/raspberrypi/raspberrypi.cpp
> b/src/libcamera/pipeline/raspberrypi/raspberrypi.cpp
> > index fc190e39732a..5aaf24436f27 100644
> > --- a/src/libcamera/pipeline/raspberrypi/raspberrypi.cpp
> > +++ b/src/libcamera/pipeline/raspberrypi/raspberrypi.cpp
> > @@ -994,7 +994,6 @@ bool PipelineHandlerRPi::match(DeviceEnumerator
> *enumerator)
> > DeviceMatch unicam("unicam");
> > DeviceMatch isp("bcm2835-isp");
> >
> > - unicam.add("unicam-embedded");
> > unicam.add("unicam-image");
> >
> > isp.add("bcm2835-isp0-output0"); /* Input */
> > @@ -1015,9 +1014,16 @@ bool PipelineHandlerRPi::match(DeviceEnumerator
> *enumerator)
> > return false;
> >
> > /* Locate and open the unicam video streams. */
> > - data->unicam_[Unicam::Embedded] = RPi::Stream("Unicam Embedded",
> unicam_->getEntityByName("unicam-embedded"));
> > data->unicam_[Unicam::Image] = RPi::Stream("Unicam Image",
> unicam_->getEntityByName("unicam-image"));
> >
> > + /* An embedded data node will not be present if the sensor does
> not support it. */
> > + MediaEntity *embeddedEntity =
> unicam_->getEntityByName("unicam-embedded");
> > + if (embeddedEntity) {
> > + data->unicam_[Unicam::Embedded] = RPi::Stream("Unicam
> Embedded", embeddedEntity);
> > +
> data->unicam_[Unicam::Embedded].dev()->bufferReady.connect(data.get(),
> > +
> &RPiCameraData::unicamBufferDequeue);
> > + }
> > +
> > /* Tag the ISP input stream as an import stream. */
> > data->isp_[Isp::Input] = RPi::Stream("ISP Input",
> isp_->getEntityByName("bcm2835-isp0-output0"), true);
> > data->isp_[Isp::Output0] = RPi::Stream("ISP Output0",
> isp_->getEntityByName("bcm2835-isp0-capture1"));
> > @@ -1027,7 +1033,6 @@ bool PipelineHandlerRPi::match(DeviceEnumerator
> *enumerator)
> > /* Wire up all the buffer connections. */
> >
> data->unicam_[Unicam::Image].dev()->frameStart.connect(data.get(),
> &RPiCameraData::frameStarted);
> >
> data->unicam_[Unicam::Image].dev()->bufferReady.connect(data.get(),
> &RPiCameraData::unicamBufferDequeue);
> > -
> data->unicam_[Unicam::Embedded].dev()->bufferReady.connect(data.get(),
> &RPiCameraData::unicamBufferDequeue);
> > data->isp_[Isp::Input].dev()->bufferReady.connect(data.get(),
> &RPiCameraData::ispInputDequeue);
> > data->isp_[Isp::Output0].dev()->bufferReady.connect(data.get(),
> &RPiCameraData::ispOutputDequeue);
> > data->isp_[Isp::Output1].dev()->bufferReady.connect(data.get(),
> &RPiCameraData::ispOutputDequeue);
> > @@ -1055,6 +1060,11 @@ bool PipelineHandlerRPi::match(DeviceEnumerator
> *enumerator)
> > return false;
> > }
> >
> > + if (sensorConfig.sensorMetadata ^ !!embeddedEntity) {
> > + LOG(RPI, Warning) << "Mismatch between Unicam and
> CamHelper for embedded data usage!";
> > + sensorConfig.sensorMetadata = false;
> > + }
> > +
> > /*
> > * Open all Unicam and ISP streams. The exception is the
> embedded data
> > * stream, which only gets opened below if the IPA reports that
> the sensor
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
> I was just wondering, is there any implication for our "embedded data
> present" CamHelper functions? Can we now just tell, or do we still
> need them?
>
It does make CamHelper::SensorEmbeddedDataPresent() a bit redundant.
I currently just use it to verify that both kernel and userland agree, but
perhaps
I should remove that member function entirely?
Regards,
Naush
>
> Other than this:
>
> Reviewed-by: David Plowman <david.plowman at raspberrypi.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
> David
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.libcamera.org/pipermail/libcamera-devel/attachments/20211022/b6432528/attachment.htm>
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list