[libcamera-devel] [PATCH v3] test: gstreamer: Add a test for gstreamer multi stream
paul.elder at ideasonboard.com
paul.elder at ideasonboard.com
Fri Sep 24 09:04:59 CEST 2021
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 11:42:18AM +0530, Vedant Paranjape wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> Can you also tell me the expected indentation ?
>
> checkstyle suggestions didn't adhere with the 80 char width thing
80 char can be broken (up to 120) as long as it increases readability.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, 24 Sep, 2021, 11:39 , <paul.elder at ideasonboard.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Vedant,
>
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 08:26:37PM +0530, Vedant Paranjape wrote:
> > This patch adds a test to test if multi stream using libcamera's
> > gstreamer element works.
> >
> > Test will run only on devices that support multistream output, i.e.,
>
> I think s/output/capture/ might be better.
>
> Also s/i.e./e.g/
>
> > devices that use IPU3 and raspberrypi pipeline. This was tested on
> > a Raspberry Pi 4B+.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vedant Paranjape <vedantparanjape160201 at gmail.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne at collabora.com>
> > ---
> > .../gstreamer/gstreamer_multi_stream_test.cpp | 128 ++++++++++++++++++
> > test/gstreamer/meson.build | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 129 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 test/gstreamer/gstreamer_multi_stream_test.cpp
> >
> > diff --git a/test/gstreamer/gstreamer_multi_stream_test.cpp b/test/
> gstreamer/gstreamer_multi_stream_test.cpp
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..6f63f1e748e2
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/test/gstreamer/gstreamer_multi_stream_test.cpp
> > @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2021, Vedant Paranjape
> > + *
> > + * gstreamer_multi_stream_test.cpp - GStreamer multi stream capture test
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <iostream>
> > +#include <unistd.h>
> > +
> > +#include <libcamera/base/utils.h>
>
> You don't use anything from this.
>
> > +
> > +#include <libcamera/libcamera.h>
> > +
> > +#include "libcamera/internal/source_paths.h"
>
> Nor this.
>
> (The single stream tests have these too)
>
> > +
> > +#include <gst/gst.h>
> > +
> > +#include "gstreamer_test.h"
> > +#include "test.h"
> > +
> > +using namespace std;
> > +
> > +class GstreamerMultiStreamTest : public GstreamerTest, public Test
> > +{
> > +public:
> > + GstreamerMultiStreamTest()
> > + : GstreamerTest()
> > + {
> > + }
> > +
> > +protected:
> > + int init() override
> > + {
> > + if (status_ != TestPass)
> > + return status_;
> > +
> > + /* Check if platform support multistream output */
> > + libcamera::CameraManager cm;
> > + cm.start();
> > + bool cameraFound = false;
> > + for (auto &camera : cm.cameras()) {
> > + if (camera->streams().size() > 1) {
> > + cameraName = camera->id();
> > + cameraFound = true;
> > + cm.stop();
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!cameraFound) {
> > + cm.stop();
> > + return TestSkip;
> > + }
> > +
> > + const gchar *streamDescription = "queue ! fakesink";
> > + g_autoptr(GError) error = NULL;
> > +
> > + stream0_ = gst_parse_bin_from_description_full
> (streamDescription, TRUE,
> > + NULL,
> > +
> GST_PARSE_FLAG_FATAL_ERRORS,
> > + &error);
Oh I let this and the next one go because it goes over, but I think I
agree with checkstyle here:
stream0_ = gst_parse_bin_from_description_full(streamDescription, TRUE,
NULL,
GST_PARSE_FLAG_FATAL_ERRORS,
&error);
> > + if (!stream0_) {
> > + g_printerr("Stream0 could not be created (%s)\n",
> error->message);
> > + return TestFail;
> > + }
> > + g_object_ref_sink(stream0_);
> > +
> > + stream1_ = gst_parse_bin_from_description_full
> (streamDescription, TRUE,
> > + NULL,
> > +
> GST_PARSE_FLAG_FATAL_ERRORS,
> > + &error);
> > + if (!stream1_) {
> > + g_printerr("Stream1 could not be created (%s)\n",
> error->message);
> > + return TestFail;
> > + }
> > + g_object_ref_sink(stream1_);
> > +
> > + if (createPipeline() != TestPass)
> > + return TestFail;
> > +
> > + return TestPass;
> > + }
> > +
> > + int run() override
> > + {
> > + g_object_set(libcameraSrc_, "camera-name", cameraName.c_str
> (), NULL);
> > +
> > + /* Build the pipeline */
> > + gst_bin_add_many(GST_BIN(pipeline_), libcameraSrc_,
> > + stream0_, stream1_,
> NULL);
>
> Indentation.
checkstyle has this one
>
> > +
> > + g_autoptr(GstPad) src_pad = gst_element_get_static_pad
> (libcameraSrc_, "src");
> > + g_autoptr(GstPad) request_pad = gst_element_get_request_pad
> (libcameraSrc_, "src_%u");
> > +
> > + {
> > + g_autoptr(GstPad) queue0_sink_pad =
> gst_element_get_static_pad(stream0_, "sink");
> > + g_autoptr(GstPad) queue1_sink_pad =
> gst_element_get_static_pad(stream1_, "sink");
> > +
> > + if (gst_pad_link(src_pad, queue0_sink_pad) !=
> GST_PAD_LINK_OK
> > + || gst_pad_link(request_pad,
> queue1_sink_pad) != GST_PAD_LINK_OK) {
>
> Indentation.
if (gst_pad_link(src_pad, queue0_sink_pad) != GST_PAD_LINK_OK ||
gst_pad_link(request_pad, queue1_sink_pad) != GST_PAD_LINK_OK) {
>
> > + g_printerr("Pads could not be linked.\n");
> > + return TestFail;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (startPipeline() != TestPass)
> > + return TestFail;
> > +
> > + if (processEvent() != TestPass)
> > + return TestFail;
> > +
> > + return TestPass;
> > + }
> > +
> > + void cleanup() override
> > + {
> > + g_clear_object(&stream0_);
> > + g_clear_object(&stream1_);
> > + }
> > +
> > +private:
> > + std::string cameraName;
>
> s/cameraName/cameraName_/
>
> > + GstElement *stream0_;
> > + GstElement *stream1_;
> > +};
> > +
> > +TEST_REGISTER(GstreamerMultiStreamTest)
> > diff --git a/test/gstreamer/meson.build b/test/gstreamer/meson.build
> > index aca53b920365..13652e87d05c 100644
> > --- a/test/gstreamer/meson.build
> > +++ b/test/gstreamer/meson.build
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ endif
> >
> > gstreamer_tests = [
> > ['single_stream_test', 'gstreamer_single_stream_test.cpp'],
> > + ['multi_stream_test', 'gstreamer_multi_stream_test.cpp'],
>
> It would be nice if the second elements lined up.
>
>
> Otherwise, looks good.
>
>
> Can I add a R-b then?
Not unless I give you one. I'll check in a new ersion.
Paul
>
> > ]
> > gstreamer_dep = dependency('gstreamer-1.0', required: true)
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list