[libcamera-devel] [PATCH v2 5/7] test: generated_serializer: Test Flags that is struct member

[paul.elder at ideasonboard.com]

Hi Laurent,

On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 03:52:34AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 03:49:20PM +0900, Paul Elder via libcamera-devel wrote:
> > Add a Flags field to the test struct to test
> > serialization/deserialization of Flags that are struct members.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder at ideasonboard.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - use new attribute-based mojom definition for Flags
> > ---
> >  .../generated_serializer_test.cpp             | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../include/libcamera/ipa/test.mojom          |  8 ++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/test/serialization/generated_serializer/generated_serializer_test.cpp b/test/serialization/generated_serializer/generated_serializer_test.cpp
> > index a4639a80..a2d71d62 100644
> > --- a/test/serialization/generated_serializer/generated_serializer_test.cpp
> > +++ b/test/serialization/generated_serializer/generated_serializer_test.cpp
> > @@ -53,6 +53,11 @@ if (struct1.field != struct2.field) {				\
> >  		t.i  = 58527;
> >  		t.c = ipa::test::IPAOperationInit;
> >  
> > +		Flags<ipa::test::ErrorFlags> flags;
> > +		flags |= ipa::test::ErrorFlags::Error1;
> > +		flags |= ipa::test::ErrorFlags::Error2;
> > +		t.f = flags;
> > +
> >  		std::vector<uint8_t> serialized;
> >  
> >  		std::tie(serialized, ignore) =
> > @@ -72,6 +77,10 @@ if (struct1.field != struct2.field) {				\
> >  		TEST_FIELD_EQUALITY(t, u, i);
> >  		TEST_FIELD_EQUALITY(t, u, c);
> >  
> > +		if (t.f != u.f) {
> > +			cerr << "Flags f field incorrect" << endl;
> > +			return TestFail;
> > +		}
> >  
> >  		/* Test vector of generated structs */
> >  		std::vector<ipa::test::TestStruct> v = { t, u };
> > @@ -96,12 +105,22 @@ if (struct1.field != struct2.field) {				\
> >  		TEST_FIELD_EQUALITY(v[0], w[0], i);
> >  		TEST_FIELD_EQUALITY(v[0], w[0], c);
> >  
> > +		if (v[0].f != w[0].f) {
> > +			cerr << "Flags f field incorrect" << endl;
> > +			return TestFail;
> > +		}
> > +
> >  		TEST_FIELD_EQUALITY(v[1], w[1], s1);
> >  		TEST_FIELD_EQUALITY(v[1], w[1], s2);
> >  		TEST_FIELD_EQUALITY(v[1], w[1], s3);
> >  		TEST_FIELD_EQUALITY(v[1], w[1], i);
> >  		TEST_FIELD_EQUALITY(v[1], w[1], c);
> >  
> > +		if (v[1].f != w[1].f) {
> > +			cerr << "Flags f field incorrect" << endl;
> > +			return TestFail;
> > +		}
> > +
> >  		return TestPass;
> >  	}
> >  
> > diff --git a/test/serialization/generated_serializer/include/libcamera/ipa/test.mojom b/test/serialization/generated_serializer/include/libcamera/ipa/test.mojom
> > index 73081b40..698f4e89 100644
> > --- a/test/serialization/generated_serializer/include/libcamera/ipa/test.mojom
> > +++ b/test/serialization/generated_serializer/include/libcamera/ipa/test.mojom
> > @@ -9,6 +9,13 @@ enum IPAOperationCode {
> >  	IPAOperationStop,
> >  };
> >  
> > +enum ErrorFlags {
> 
> I assume this will become
> 
> [scopedEnum] enum ErrorFlags {

Yeah, it will.

> 
> > +	Error1 = 0x1,
> > +	Error2 = 0x2,
> > +	Error3 = 0x4,
> > +	Error4 = 0x8,
> > +};
> > +
> >  struct IPASettings {};
> >  
> >  struct TestStruct {
> > @@ -19,6 +26,7 @@ struct TestStruct {
> >  	int32 i;
> >  	string s3;
> >  	IPAOperationCode c;
> > +	[Flags] ErrorFlags f;
> 
> I forgot to mention that in the review of 4/7, so I'll mention it here:
> should the attribute be [flags] to match the camelCase syntax of other
> attributes ?

That's what I thought too on one hand, but my other hand said that it's
meant to become Flags<ErrorFlags>, so I matched the capitalization to
that.

Which hand is better?

> 
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>


Thanks,

Paul

> 
> >  };
> >  
> >  interface IPATestInterface {