[libcamera-devel] libcamerasrc on librem 5: bayer support missing

[Nicolas Dufresne]

Le mercredi 21 décembre 2022 à 15:11 +0100, Pavel Machek a écrit :
> > If this is a prioritised list, I expect x-bayer should be after jpeg?
> > But I'm not sure if it is...
> > 
> > And I wonder if the caps should be determined from the camera device anyway?
> 
> I don't believe it is prioritised, and won't pretend to understand the
> dynamic negotiation, as this works with jpeg we should be fine.

Indeed, I believe if there is no filtering of caps downstream, our current
implementation will endup sorted according to the templates. As a reflex, I'd
place bayer last, as its more niche, but until we have a use case, I would not
go into implementing a weighted sort (like we have in v4l2src).

regards,
Nicolas