[libcamera-devel] [PATCH] v4l2: v4l2_camera_proxy: Zero flags in VIDIOC_REQBUFS
paul.elder at ideasonboard.com
paul.elder at ideasonboard.com
Fri Jan 14 12:08:00 CET 2022
Hi Laurent,
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 10:28:38PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> The V4L2 compatibility layer doesn't support any of the VIDIOC_REQBUFS
> flags. They are all correctly ignored, but also need to be zeroed
> before returning to indicate that they haven't been taken into account.
>
> This fixes a v4l2-compliance failure:
>
> Buffer ioctls (Input 0):
> fail: ../../utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-buffers.cpp(682): coherent
> test VIDIOC_REQBUFS/CREATE_BUFS/QUERYBUF: FAIL
>
> Fixes: aa4533639971 ("include: linux: Update kernel headers to version v5.16-rc7")
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder at ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> src/v4l2/v4l2_camera_proxy.cpp | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/v4l2/v4l2_camera_proxy.cpp b/src/v4l2/v4l2_camera_proxy.cpp
> index 4d529bc29a4d..1802d90bf30b 100644
> --- a/src/v4l2/v4l2_camera_proxy.cpp
> +++ b/src/v4l2/v4l2_camera_proxy.cpp
> @@ -469,6 +469,7 @@ int V4L2CameraProxy::vidioc_reqbufs(V4L2CameraFile *file, struct v4l2_requestbuf
> return -EBUSY;
>
> arg->capabilities = V4L2_BUF_CAP_SUPPORTS_MMAP;
> + arg->flags = 0;
> memset(arg->reserved, 0, sizeof(arg->reserved));
>
> if (arg->count == 0) {
>
> base-commit: eff9de397ac37e948e5ca603814fcaba9bcd8df5
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
>
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list