[libcamera-devel] [PATCH v8 2/4] libcamera: controls: Define size of array controls as a shape vector
Kieran Bingham
kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com
Tue Jul 5 11:18:36 CEST 2022
Quoting Christian Rauch via libcamera-devel (2022-07-05 01:14:10)
>
>
> Am 05.07.22 um 00:50 schrieb Laurent Pinchart:
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 02:37:57AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart via libcamera-devel wrote:
> >> Hi Christian,
> >>
> >> Thank you for the patch.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 01:03:36PM +0100, Christian Rauch via libcamera-devel wrote:
> >>> This follows the convention in other Tensor APIs. Since all tensors are
> >>> represented as a Span with a single dimension, values provided in 'size'
> >>> are interpreted as fixed-size Spans, while an empty array ("[]") will be
> >>> interpreted as variable-sized Span.
> >>
> >> I like the new syntax, even if it doesn't make it clear how we'll handle
> >> multi-dimensional arrays with variable numbers of elements in one or
> >> multiple dimensions, but we can worry about that later when/if needed.
> >
> > Just a quick note on this. In the review of previous versions, a syntax
> > such as [,] was proposed for a 2D NxN array, and [,3] for a Nx3 array.
> > This won't work correctly, as neither are valid YAML syntax.
> >
> > One workaround for this would be to turn the size element into a string,
> > e.g.
> >
> > size: '[,]'
> >
> > I don't like this much. Another option would be to reuse 'n', e.g. [n,n]
> > and [n,3]. If we go that way, we should keep [n] already to denote a
> > dynamic 1D array.
> >
> > Any other option ?
>
> In such a case, I would use "0" as the magic value to indicate a
> variable size dimension, since a 0-size will never be used in practice.
> With this syntax, "[0,3]" would translate into a "N x 3" sized array and
> "[0,2,0]" into "N x 2 x M". We would need to parse this and replace all
> occurrences of 0 with a dynamic-sized length, but the sum will then
> still mean the "minimum total size".
>
> I am not a fan of using a character (e.g. 'n') to indicate this, as this
> is a bit arbitrary and "[n,3,n]" could mean that the first and last
> dimension have to have the same length "n".
Throwing another option in, can we use '*' or '?'?
I dislike '0' as that has a 'real' value, so to me an array of [0,3]
while not 'useful' ... is conceptually valid, and therefore doesn't
confer that it could be variable.
Or otherwise, can we convey that any 'letter' is a variable, so that we
'can' support both
[n,n,n], (To state that it must be 3,3,3 or 4,4,4)
or
[n,m,5], (to convey that there are two distinct variables ?)
Or even
[w,h] if it's appropriate?
--
Kieran
>
> >
> >> This patch by itself introduces compilation errors, for instance, with
> >> clang-14,
> >>
> >> In file included from ../../src/libcamera/camera_sensor.cpp:8:
> >> In file included from ../../include/libcamera/internal/camera_sensor.h:17:
> >> In file included from include/libcamera/control_ids.h:15:
> >> ../../include/libcamera/controls.h:403:8: error: no matching member function for call to 'set'
> >> val->set<T>(Span<const typename std::remove_cv_t<V>>{ value.begin(), value.size() });
> >> ~~~~~^~~~~~
> >> ../../src/libcamera/camera_sensor.cpp:421:14: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'libcamera::ControlList::set<libcamera::Rectangle, libcamera::Rectangle>' requested here
> >> properties_.set(properties::PixelArrayActiveAreas, { activeArea_ });
> >> ^
> >> ../../include/libcamera/controls.h:178:7: note: candidate function template not viable: no known conversion from 'Span<const typename std::remove_cv_t<Rectangle>>' (aka 'Span<const libcamera::Rectangle>') to 'const libcamera::Rectangle' for 1st argument
> >> void set(const T &value)
> >> ^
> >> ../../include/libcamera/controls.h:190:7: note: candidate template ignored: requirement 'details::is_span<libcamera::Rectangle>::value || std::is_same<std::string, libcamera::Rectangle>::value' was not satisfied [with T = libcamera::Rectangle]
> >> void set(const T &value)
> >> ^
> >> 1 error generated.
> >>
> >> I'll update the Python generator script here to fix this, it will be
> >> part of v9.
> >>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Christian Rauch <Rauch.Christian at gmx.de>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo at jmondi.org>
> >>> ---
> >>> src/libcamera/control_ids.yaml | 4 ++--
> >>> src/libcamera/property_ids.yaml | 4 ++--
> >>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/src/libcamera/control_ids.yaml b/src/libcamera/control_ids.yaml
> >>> index cd1d4512..f707c1f5 100644
> >>> --- a/src/libcamera/control_ids.yaml
> >>> +++ b/src/libcamera/control_ids.yaml
> >>> @@ -291,7 +291,7 @@ controls:
> >>> transformation. The 3x3 matrix is stored in conventional reading
> >>> order in an array of 9 floating point values.
> >>>
> >>> - size: [3x3]
> >>> + size: [3,3]
> >>>
> >>> - ScalerCrop:
> >>> type: Rectangle
> >>> @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ controls:
> >>> the window where the focal distance for the objects shown in that part
> >>> of the image are closest to the camera.
> >>>
> >>> - size: [n]
> >>> + size: []
> >>>
> >>> - AfTrigger:
> >>> type: int32_t
> >>> diff --git a/src/libcamera/property_ids.yaml b/src/libcamera/property_ids.yaml
> >>> index 11b7ebdc..a87485d7 100644
> >>> --- a/src/libcamera/property_ids.yaml
> >>> +++ b/src/libcamera/property_ids.yaml
> >>> @@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ controls:
> >>>
> >>> - PixelArrayOpticalBlackRectangles:
> >>> type: Rectangle
> >>> - size: [n]
> >>> + size: []
> >>> description: |
> >>> The pixel array region(s) which contain optical black pixels
> >>> considered valid for calibration purposes.
> >>> @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ controls:
> >>>
> >>> - PixelArrayActiveAreas:
> >>> type: Rectangle
> >>> - size: [n]
> >>> + size: []
> >>> description: |
> >>> The PixelArrayActiveAreas property defines the (possibly multiple and
> >>> overlapping) portions of the camera sensor readable pixel matrix
> >
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list