[libcamera-devel] [PATCH v6 4/8] ipa: raspberrypi: Use YamlParser to replace dependency on boost
Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Mon Jul 25 15:50:28 CEST 2022
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 11:50:06AM +0100, David Plowman wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2022 at 11:26, Naushir Patuck <naush at raspberrypi.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 at 20:25, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 09:15:58AM +0100, Naushir Patuck wrote:
> >> > From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> >> >
> >> > The Raspberry Pi IPA module depends on boost only to parse the JSON
> >> > tuning data files. As libcamera depends on libyaml, use the YamlParser
> >> > class to parse those files and drop the dependency on boost.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> >>
> >> I assume you're fine with this patch as you've posted it as part of your
> >> series, but could you give it a review ? :-)
> >
> > I did have one outstanding query on this about default values.
> >
> > If you recall, we discussed having YamlObject::get() not take in a default value
> > and complain loudly if the key is not present, similar to what the Boost parser
> > does now. This will help avoid possibly hard to debug issues if a critical
> > parameter is missing from the tuning config. David, what are your thoughts?
>
> I agree it would be nice to get some kind of error or at least warning
> if something that we really expected is not present. Possibly we could
> review some of those and provide default values in more cases, but I'm
> guessing that's not the kind of thing to "hide" inside a patch that
> isn't meant to change the behaviour of any algorithms.
I agree, that's a good point.
The boost json parser will throw an exception in this case, which I
can't replicate in YamlObject. I can update the Read() function to
return an error, would it be enough to log a message at the top level,
or would you like individual log statements in every location to tell
which parameter was missing ?
> > Do you think this is something that we can add easily to this patch?
> >
> >> > ---
> >> > README.rst | 6 --
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/algorithm.cpp | 2 +-
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/algorithm.hpp | 6 +-
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/controller.cpp | 27 ++++--
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/pwl.cpp | 12 ++-
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/pwl.hpp | 5 +-
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/rpi/agc.cpp | 94 +++++++++----------
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/rpi/agc.hpp | 10 +-
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/rpi/alsc.cpp | 94 +++++++++----------
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/rpi/alsc.hpp | 2 +-
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/rpi/awb.cpp | 89 +++++++++---------
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/rpi/awb.hpp | 8 +-
> >> > .../controller/rpi/black_level.cpp | 12 +--
> >> > .../controller/rpi/black_level.hpp | 2 +-
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/rpi/ccm.cpp | 28 +++---
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/rpi/ccm.hpp | 4 +-
> >> > .../raspberrypi/controller/rpi/contrast.cpp | 18 ++--
> >> > .../raspberrypi/controller/rpi/contrast.hpp | 2 +-
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/rpi/dpc.cpp | 4 +-
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/rpi/dpc.hpp | 2 +-
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/rpi/geq.cpp | 10 +-
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/rpi/geq.hpp | 2 +-
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/rpi/lux.cpp | 12 +--
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/rpi/lux.hpp | 2 +-
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/rpi/noise.cpp | 6 +-
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/rpi/noise.hpp | 2 +-
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/rpi/sdn.cpp | 6 +-
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/controller/rpi/sdn.hpp | 2 +-
> >> > .../raspberrypi/controller/rpi/sharpen.cpp | 8 +-
> >> > .../raspberrypi/controller/rpi/sharpen.hpp | 2 +-
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/meson.build | 1 -
> >> > src/ipa/raspberrypi/raspberrypi.cpp | 1 +
> >> > 32 files changed, 241 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-)
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list