[libcamera-devel] [PATCH 11/13] gstreamer: Split request creation to a separate function

Nicolas Dufresne nicolas.dufresne at collabora.com
Tue Jun 28 15:26:13 CEST 2022


Hi Laurent,

Le vendredi 24 juin 2022 à 02:22 +0300, Laurent Pinchart a écrit :
> In order to prepare for creation and queuing of multiple requests, move
> the request creation and queueing code to a separate function. No
> functional change intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> ---
>  src/gstreamer/gstlibcamerasrc.cpp | 76 +++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/gstreamer/gstlibcamerasrc.cpp b/src/gstreamer/gstlibcamerasrc.cpp
> index 58a322b251c7..fb39d6093a3f 100644
> --- a/src/gstreamer/gstlibcamerasrc.cpp
> +++ b/src/gstreamer/gstlibcamerasrc.cpp
> @@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ struct GstLibcameraSrcState {
>  
>  	guint group_id_;
>  
> +	int queueRequest();
>  	void requestCompleted(Request *request);
>  };
>  
> @@ -160,6 +161,44 @@ GstStaticPadTemplate request_src_template = {
>  	"src_%u", GST_PAD_SRC, GST_PAD_REQUEST, TEMPLATE_CAPS
>  };
>  
> +int GstLibcameraSrcState::queueRequest()

This function must be called with stream lock held, please comment above the
function.

> +{
> +	std::unique_ptr<Request> request = cam_->createRequest();
> +	if (!request)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	std::unique_ptr<RequestWrap> wrap =
> +		std::make_unique<RequestWrap>(std::move(request));
> +
> +	for (GstPad *srcpad : srcpads_) {
> +		Stream *stream = gst_libcamera_pad_get_stream(srcpad);
> +		GstLibcameraPool *pool = gst_libcamera_pad_get_pool(srcpad);
> +		GstBuffer *buffer;
> +		GstFlowReturn ret;
> +
> +		ret = gst_buffer_pool_acquire_buffer(GST_BUFFER_POOL(pool),
> +						     &buffer, nullptr);
> +		if (ret != GST_FLOW_OK) {
> +			/*
> +			 * RequestWrap has ownership of the request, and we
> +			 * won't be queueing this one due to lack of buffers.
> +			 */
> +			return -ENOBUFS;
> +		}
> +
> +		wrap->attachBuffer(stream, buffer);
> +	}
> +
> +	GST_TRACE_OBJECT(src_, "Requesting buffers");
> +	cam_->queueRequest(wrap->request_.get());
> +
> +	MutexLocker locker(lock_);
> +	queuedRequests_.push(std::move(wrap));

Possible maintenance trap, add a scope around the locker perhaps ?

> +
> +	/* The RequestWrap will be deleted in the completion handler. */
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  void
>  GstLibcameraSrcState::requestCompleted(Request *request)
>  {
> @@ -269,8 +308,8 @@ gst_libcamera_src_task_run(gpointer user_data)
>  	GstLibcameraSrc *self = GST_LIBCAMERA_SRC(user_data);
>  	GstLibcameraSrcState *state = self->state;
>  
> -	std::unique_ptr<Request> request = state->cam_->createRequest();
> -	if (!request) {
> +	int err = state->queueRequest();
> +	if (err == -ENOMEM) {
>  		GST_ELEMENT_ERROR(self, RESOURCE, NO_SPACE_LEFT,
>  				  ("Failed to allocate request for camera '%s'.",
>  				   state->cam_->id().c_str()),
> @@ -279,38 +318,7 @@ gst_libcamera_src_task_run(gpointer user_data)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	std::unique_ptr<RequestWrap> wrap =
> -		std::make_unique<RequestWrap>(std::move(request));
> -
> -	for (GstPad *srcpad : state->srcpads_) {
> -		Stream *stream = gst_libcamera_pad_get_stream(srcpad);
> -		GstLibcameraPool *pool = gst_libcamera_pad_get_pool(srcpad);
> -		GstBuffer *buffer;
> -		GstFlowReturn ret;
> -
> -		ret = gst_buffer_pool_acquire_buffer(GST_BUFFER_POOL(pool),
> -						     &buffer, nullptr);
> -		if (ret != GST_FLOW_OK) {
> -			/*
> -			 * RequestWrap has ownership of the request, and we
> -			 * won't be queueing this one due to lack of buffers.
> -			 */
> -			wrap.release();
> -			break;
> -		}
> -
> -		wrap->attachBuffer(stream, buffer);
> -	}
> -
> -	if (wrap) {
> -		GST_TRACE_OBJECT(self, "Requesting buffers");
> -		state->cam_->queueRequest(wrap->request_.get());
> -
> -		MutexLocker locker(state->lock_);
> -		state->queuedRequests_.push(std::move(wrap));
> -
> -		/* The RequestWrap will be deleted in the completion handler. */
> -	}
> +	std::unique_ptr<RequestWrap> wrap;
>  
>  	{
>  		MutexLocker locker(state->lock_);

Nothing major here:

Reviewed-by: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne at collabora.com>



More information about the libcamera-devel mailing list