[libcamera-devel] [PATCH v3] libcamera: v4l2_device: Workaround faulty control menus

Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Thu Nov 24 15:07:57 CET 2022


Hi Kieran,

Thank you for the patch.

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 01:03:08PM +0000, Kieran Bingham via libcamera-devel wrote:
> Some UVC cameras have been identified that can provide V4L2 menu
> controls without any menu items.
> 
> This leads to a segfault where we try to construct a
> ControlInfo(Span<>,default) with an empty span.
> 
> Convert the v4l2ControlInfo and v4l2MenuControlInfo helper functions to
> return std::optional<ControlInfo> to be able to account in the caller if
> the control is valid, and only add acceptable controls to the supported
> control list.
> 
> Menu controls without a list of menu items are no longer added as a
> valid control and a warning is logged.
> 
> This also fixes a potential crash that would have occured in the
> unlikely event that a ctrl.minimum was set to less than 0.
> 
> Bug: https://bugs.libcamera.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167
> Reported-by: Marian Buschsieweke <marian.buschsieweke at ovgu.de>
> Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo at jmondi.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com>
> ---
>  include/libcamera/internal/v4l2_device.h |  4 +--
>  src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp            | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/libcamera/internal/v4l2_device.h b/include/libcamera/internal/v4l2_device.h
> index 75304be11f77..50d4adbc5f2b 100644
> --- a/include/libcamera/internal/v4l2_device.h
> +++ b/include/libcamera/internal/v4l2_device.h
> @@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ protected:
>  private:
>  	static ControlType v4l2CtrlType(uint32_t ctrlType);
>  	static std::unique_ptr<ControlId> v4l2ControlId(const v4l2_query_ext_ctrl &ctrl);
> -	ControlInfo v4l2ControlInfo(const v4l2_query_ext_ctrl &ctrl);
> -	ControlInfo v4l2MenuControlInfo(const v4l2_query_ext_ctrl &ctrl);
> +	std::optional<ControlInfo> v4l2ControlInfo(const v4l2_query_ext_ctrl &ctrl);
> +	std::optional<ControlInfo> v4l2MenuControlInfo(const v4l2_query_ext_ctrl &ctrl);
>  
>  	void listControls();
>  	void updateControls(ControlList *ctrls,
> diff --git a/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp b/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp
> index c17b323f8af0..5dd51037960d 100644
> --- a/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp
> +++ b/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp
> @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ std::unique_ptr<ControlId> V4L2Device::v4l2ControlId(const v4l2_query_ext_ctrl &
>   * \param[in] ctrl The v4l2_query_ext_ctrl that represents a V4L2 control
>   * \return A ControlInfo that represents \a ctrl
>   */
> -ControlInfo V4L2Device::v4l2ControlInfo(const v4l2_query_ext_ctrl &ctrl)
> +std::optional<ControlInfo> V4L2Device::v4l2ControlInfo(const v4l2_query_ext_ctrl &ctrl)
>  {
>  	switch (ctrl.type) {
>  	case V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_U8:
> @@ -566,14 +566,14 @@ ControlInfo V4L2Device::v4l2ControlInfo(const v4l2_query_ext_ctrl &ctrl)
>   *
>   * \return A ControlInfo that represents \a ctrl
>   */
> -ControlInfo V4L2Device::v4l2MenuControlInfo(const struct v4l2_query_ext_ctrl &ctrl)
> +std::optional<ControlInfo> V4L2Device::v4l2MenuControlInfo(const struct v4l2_query_ext_ctrl &ctrl)
>  {
>  	std::vector<ControlValue> indices;
>  	struct v4l2_querymenu menu = {};
>  	menu.id = ctrl.id;
>  
>  	if (ctrl.minimum < 0)
> -		return ControlInfo();
> +		return std::nullopt;
>  
>  	for (int32_t index = ctrl.minimum; index <= ctrl.maximum; ++index) {
>  		menu.index = index;
> @@ -583,6 +583,17 @@ ControlInfo V4L2Device::v4l2MenuControlInfo(const struct v4l2_query_ext_ctrl &ct
>  		indices.push_back(index);
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Some faulty UVC drivers are known to return an empty menu control.

s/drivers/devices/ ?

> +	 * Controls without a menu option can not be set, or read, so they are
> +	 * not exposed.
> +	 */
> +	if (indices.size() == 0) {
> +		LOG(V4L2, Warning)
> +			<< "Menu control '" << ctrl.name << "' has no entries";

Would you consider this a driver bug ? If so a warning sounds fine, and
we should also fix the driver. If not, maybe we should demote the
warning message to a debug message ?

> +		return std::nullopt;
> +	}
> +
>  	return ControlInfo(indices,
>  			   ControlValue(static_cast<int32_t>(ctrl.default_value)));
>  }
> @@ -631,7 +642,17 @@ void V4L2Device::listControls()
>  		controlIdMap_[ctrl.id] = controlIds_.back().get();
>  		controlInfo_.emplace(ctrl.id, ctrl);
>  
> -		ctrls.emplace(controlIds_.back().get(), v4l2ControlInfo(ctrl));
> +		std::optional<ControlInfo> info = v4l2ControlInfo(ctrl);
> +
> +		if (!info) {
> +			LOG(V4L2, Error)
> +				<< "Control " << ctrl.name
> +				<< " cannot be registered.";

s/registered./registered/

But I would drop this as we already log a message in
v4l2MenuControlInfo() (or you could drop the message there instead).

> +
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		ctrls.emplace(controlIds_.back().get(), *info);
>  	}
>  
>  	controls_ = ControlInfoMap(std::move(ctrls), controlIdMap_);
> @@ -670,7 +691,7 @@ void V4L2Device::updateControlInfo()
>  			continue;
>  		}
>  
> -		info = v4l2ControlInfo(ctrl);
> +		info = *v4l2ControlInfo(ctrl);
>  	}
>  }
>  

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


More information about the libcamera-devel mailing list