[libcamera-devel] [PATCH 03/14] libcamera: v4l2_videodevice: Move FD duplication in V4L2Device::Open
Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Mon Oct 3 16:14:10 CEST 2022
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 11:19:01AM +0200, Jacopo Mondi via libcamera-devel wrote:
> Hello Xavier,
>
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 08:48:39PM +0200, Xavier Roumegue via libcamera-devel wrote:
> > This ensures that the V4L2Device controls attributes have been enumerated
> > in its open() method in case of file descriptor duplication.
>
> Do I get this right or the actual issue is the controls are not
> enumerated for M2M devices because V4L2Device::open() (and consequentially
> V4L2Device::listControls()) is never called for them ?
>
> If that's the case, I would squash 2 and 3 and clarify this in the
> commit message.
I agree. And as setFd() is now used internally only, I would turn it
from a protected to a private function.
I think I would prefer keeping the file handle duplication in
V4L2VideoDevice::open() though. I'll propose a patch.
> > Signed-off-by: Xavier Roumegue <xavier.roumegue at oss.nxp.com>
> > ---
> > src/libcamera/v4l2_videodevice.cpp | 12 ++----------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/libcamera/v4l2_videodevice.cpp b/src/libcamera/v4l2_videodevice.cpp
> > index 955e1508..d0427fef 100644
> > --- a/src/libcamera/v4l2_videodevice.cpp
> > +++ b/src/libcamera/v4l2_videodevice.cpp
> > @@ -661,17 +661,9 @@ int V4L2VideoDevice::open(SharedFD handle, enum v4l2_buf_type type)
> > {
> > int ret;
> >
> > - UniqueFD newFd = handle.dup();
> > - if (!newFd.isValid()) {
> > - ret = -errno;
> > - LOG(V4L2, Error) << "Failed to duplicate file handle: "
> > - << strerror(-ret);
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > -
> > - ret = V4L2Device::setFd(std::move(newFd));
> > + ret = V4L2Device::open(handle);
> > if (ret < 0) {
> > - LOG(V4L2, Error) << "Failed to set file handle: "
> > + LOG(V4L2, Error) << "Failed to open file handle: "
> > << strerror(-ret);
>
> V4L2Device::open() already complains out loud in case of failure. I
> would drop the error message here.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo at jmondi.org>
>
> > return ret;
> > }
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list