[libcamera-devel] [RFC PATCH] libcamera: v4l2_device: Always set all four V4L2 colorspace fields
Jacopo Mondi
jacopo at jmondi.org
Tue Oct 25 10:01:17 CEST 2022
Hi Laurent,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 04:21:31AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> When setting a colorspace on a V4L2 video capture device or a subdev
> source pad, the kernel considers the colorspace, xfer_func, ycbcr_enc
> and quantization fields as four independent values. Any field set to
> V4L2_*_DEFAULT by userspace is ignored, and the driver keeps its current
> configuration for that field. This behaviour, while not necessarily well
> known, is clearly documented in [1] and [2], and is implemented by the
> rkisp1 driver.
>
> The V4L2Device::fromColorSpace() function, when converting from a
> libcamera ColorSpace to the V4L2 format colorspace-related fields, first
> attempts to find a match for a colorspace preset. If found, it only sets
> the colorspace field, and leaves the xfer_func, ycbcr_enc and
> quantization fields to V4L2_*_DEFAULT. This contradicts the V4L2
> specification, and prevents setting the transfer function, YCbCr
> encoding and quantization on at least rkisp1.
>
> Fix this issue by dropping the preset lookup, and set all four
> colorspace-related fields explicitly.
>
> [1] https://linuxtv.org/downloads/v4l-dvb-apis/userspace-api/v4l/pixfmt-v4l2.html#id2
> [2] https://linuxtv.org/downloads/v4l-dvb-apis/userspace-api/v4l/subdev-formats.html#id2
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> ---
> I expect this change to cause breakages on Raspberry Pi, hence the RFC.
>
> The bcm2835-isp driver doesn't comply with the V4L2 API specification. I
> certainly won't blame it, as I implemented the same non-compliant
> behaviour in the rkisp1 driver initially, before realizing that V4L2
> doesn't consider the colorspace field as a preset in set format calls
> (this has been confirmed by Hans). The question is how to move forward
> here. Fixing the driver to make it compliant with V4L2 wouldn't be
> difficult, but I expect non-libcamera users to be surprised. I don't
> expect many such users though, so if that's fine, the only possible
> issue would be synchronizing the changes in the driver and in libcamera.
>
> Other options may be possible. I don't think updating the V4L2 API
> specification to consider the colorspace field as a preset will be well
> received upstream (and I don't think I would like that much myself to be
> honest). Keeping a non-compliant implementation in the bcm2835-isp
> driver with specific handling in libcamera could be done, but I don't
> think it would be upstreamable.
>
> ---
Regardless of the general issue, I can confirm with this patch I can
capture full range YUV data on RkISP1.
Interestingly, I don't even need to specify a colorspace to cam on the
command line. I will investigate if that's intended or not.
Tested-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo at jmondi.org>
Thanks
j
> src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp | 14 --------------
> 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp b/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp
> index c17b323f8af0..e60a9ae217de 100644
> --- a/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp
> +++ b/src/libcamera/v4l2_device.cpp
> @@ -915,20 +915,6 @@ int V4L2Device::fromColorSpace(const std::optional<ColorSpace> &colorSpace, T &v
> if (!colorSpace)
> return 0;
>
> - auto itColor = std::find_if(colorSpaceToV4l2.begin(), colorSpaceToV4l2.end(),
> - [&colorSpace](const auto &item) {
> - return colorSpace == item.first;
> - });
> - if (itColor != colorSpaceToV4l2.end()) {
> - v4l2Format.colorspace = itColor->second;
> - /* Leaving all the other fields as "default" should be fine. */
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * If the colorSpace doesn't precisely match a standard color space,
> - * then we must choose a V4L2 colorspace with matching primaries.
> - */
> int ret = 0;
>
> auto itPrimaries = primariesToV4l2.find(colorSpace->primaries);
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
>
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list