[libcamera-devel] [PATCH v5 11/12] pipeline: raspberrypi: Allow pipeline handler to always use the newest frame
Kieran Bingham
kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com
Fri Jan 20 12:22:22 CET 2023
Quoting Naushir Patuck via libcamera-devel (2023-01-18 08:59:52)
> Add a pipeline config parameter "return_newest_frames" to always use the
> most recently captured Unicam frame when processing a request. This effectively
> stops the pipeline handler from queuing Unicam buffers and processing requests
> using the buffer at the front of the queue.
>
> Note that setting this parameter might incur unnecessary frame drops during
> times of high transient CPU loads where the application might not be able to
> provide requests quick enough.
I'd be tempted to add here, 'But it can lower perceived latency of the
output when recovering from a frame drop scenario' ? (if that's correct)
>
> Signed-off-by: Naushir Patuck <naush at raspberrypi.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Plowman <david.plowman at raspberrypi.com>
> ---
> .../pipeline/raspberrypi/data/example.yaml | 7 +++++-
> .../pipeline/raspberrypi/raspberrypi.cpp | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/libcamera/pipeline/raspberrypi/data/example.yaml b/src/libcamera/pipeline/raspberrypi/data/example.yaml
> index 421f30e62aa3..04a117f38ada 100644
> --- a/src/libcamera/pipeline/raspberrypi/data/example.yaml
> +++ b/src/libcamera/pipeline/raspberrypi/data/example.yaml
> @@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
>
> # Override any request from the IPA to drop a number of startup
> # frames.
> - "disable_startup_frame_drops": false
> + "disable_startup_frame_drops": false,
Can the options always have a comma so they don't require modifiying
the previous one to add a new one?
Is that because you're treating this file as json instead of yaml ?
> +
> + # Always process a pending request with the last captured sensor
> + # frame. Note that this might lead to avoidable frame drops
> + # during periods of transient heavy CPU loading.
> + "return_newest_frames": false
> }
> }
> diff --git a/src/libcamera/pipeline/raspberrypi/raspberrypi.cpp b/src/libcamera/pipeline/raspberrypi/raspberrypi.cpp
> index 3529d331deb6..21edc8e05469 100644
> --- a/src/libcamera/pipeline/raspberrypi/raspberrypi.cpp
> +++ b/src/libcamera/pipeline/raspberrypi/raspberrypi.cpp
> @@ -314,6 +314,11 @@ public:
> * frames.
> */
> bool disableStartupFrameDrops;
> + /*
> + * Always process a pending request with the last captured sensor
last / 'most recently' ?
> + * frame.
> + */
> + bool returnNewestFrames;
> };
>
> Config config_;
> @@ -1712,6 +1717,7 @@ int RPiCameraData::configurePipeline()
> .minUnicamBuffers = 2,
> .minTotalUnicamBuffers = 4,
> .disableStartupFrameDrops = false,
> + .returnNewestFrames = false,
> };
>
> char const *configFromEnv = utils::secure_getenv("LIBCAMERA_RPI_CONFIG_FILE");
> @@ -1747,6 +1753,8 @@ int RPiCameraData::configurePipeline()
> phConfig["min_total_unicam_buffers"].get<unsigned int>(config_.minTotalUnicamBuffers);
> config_.disableStartupFrameDrops =
> phConfig["disable_startup_frame_drops"].get<bool>(config_.disableStartupFrameDrops);
> + config_.returnNewestFrames =
> + phConfig["return_newest_frames"].get<bool>(config_.returnNewestFrames);
>
> if (config_.minTotalUnicamBuffers < config_.minUnicamBuffers) {
> LOG(RPI, Error) << "Invalid configuration: min_total_unicam_buffers must be >= min_unicam_buffers";
> @@ -2329,6 +2337,21 @@ bool RPiCameraData::findMatchingBuffers(BayerFrame &bayerFrame, FrameBuffer *&em
> if (bayerQueue_.empty())
> return false;
>
> + /*
> + * If the pipeline is configured to only ever return the most recently
> + * captured frame, empty the buffer queue until a single element is
> + * left, corresponding to the most recent buffer. Note that this will
> + * likely result in possibly avoidable dropped frames.
> + */
> + if (config_.returnNewestFrames && !unicam_[Unicam::Image].isExternal()) {
> + while (bayerQueue_.size() > 1) {
Is this required?
I'm a bit puzzled at the need to drop all the other frames. Don't we
just need to choose the oldest buffer to drop so that we can capture a
new image?
There's still the potential for the pipeline to catch up
isn't there?
> + FrameBuffer *bayer = bayerQueue_.front().buffer;
> +
> + unicam_[Unicam::Image].returnBuffer(bayer);
> + bayerQueue_.pop();
> + }
> + }
> +
> /*
> * Find the embedded data buffer with a matching timestamp to pass to
> * the IPA. Any embedded buffers with a timestamp lower than the
> --
> 2.25.1
>
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list