[PATCH v4 5/6] libtuning: Add initial AWB module

Stefan Klug stefan.klug at ideasonboard.com
Fri Aug 30 09:59:38 CEST 2024


Hi Laurent,

Thank you for the patch.

On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 02:31:15AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
> 
> Thank you for the patch.
> 
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 10:44:22AM +0200, Stefan Klug wrote:
> > This AWB modules uses the awb function from Raspberry Pi to calculate
> 
> s/modules/module/
> 
> > the needed white balance gains per colour temperature. It stores these
> > gains in the tuning file. Currently they are only used for the manual
> > colour temperature control. It is likely that they will be used with
> > more complex awb algorithms.
> 
> I would drop the last two sentences as they are not relevant to the
> tuning tool (unless I'm missing something).
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Klug <stefan.klug at ideasonboard.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com>
> > ---
> >  .../tuning/libtuning/modules/awb/__init__.py  |  6 +++
> >  utils/tuning/libtuning/modules/awb/awb.py     | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  utils/tuning/libtuning/modules/awb/rkisp1.py  | 27 ++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 75 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 utils/tuning/libtuning/modules/awb/__init__.py
> >  create mode 100644 utils/tuning/libtuning/modules/awb/awb.py
> >  create mode 100644 utils/tuning/libtuning/modules/awb/rkisp1.py
> > 
> > diff --git a/utils/tuning/libtuning/modules/awb/__init__.py b/utils/tuning/libtuning/modules/awb/__init__.py
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..2d67f10cfc4f
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/utils/tuning/libtuning/modules/awb/__init__.py
> > @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > +#
> > +# Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas On Board
> > +
> > +from libtuning.modules.awb.awb import AWB
> > +from libtuning.modules.awb.rkisp1 import AWBRkISP1
> > diff --git a/utils/tuning/libtuning/modules/awb/awb.py b/utils/tuning/libtuning/modules/awb/awb.py
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..5680a44fd3e3
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/utils/tuning/libtuning/modules/awb/awb.py
> > @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > +#
> > +# Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas On Board
> > +
> > +import logging
> > +
> > +from ..module import Module
> > +
> > +from libtuning.ctt_awb import awb
> > +import numpy as np
> > +
> > +logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
> > +
> > +
> > +class AWB(Module):
> > +    type = 'awb'
> > +    hr_name = 'AWB (Base)'
> > +    out_name = 'GenericAWB'
> > +
> > +    def __init__(self, *,
> > +                 debug: list):
> 
> Is the line break necessary ?

Nope, that was a copy paste remnant.

> 
> > +        super().__init__()
> > +
> > +        self.debug = debug
> > +
> > +    def do_calculation(self, images):
> > +        logger.info('Starting AWB calculation')
> > +
> > +        imgs = [img for img in images if img.macbeth is not None]
> > +
> > +        gains, _, _ = awb(imgs, None, None, False)
> > +        gains = np.array(gains)
> > +        gains = gains.reshape(-1, 3)
> 
> Do we really need numpy for this, can you write
> 
>         res = []
>         for i in range(len(gains) // 3):
>             res.append({
>                 'ct': int(v[i*3]),
>                 'gains': [float(1.0 / v[i*3+1]), float(1.0 / v[i*3+2])]
>             })
> 
> I suppose numpy may make it clearer, and shouldn't be a performance
> issue... In that case, maybe
> 
>         return [{'ct': int(v[0]), 'gains': [float(1.0 / v[1]), float(1.0 / v[2])]} for v in gains]
> 
> or maybe that's too long. Up to you.

I like the expressiveness of numpy. I changed it to 

        gains = np.reshape(gains, (-1, 3))

        return [{
                    'ct': int(v[0]),
                    'gains': [float(1.0 / v[1]), float(1.0 / v[2])]
                } for v in gains]


which (to me) is still readable but more compact.

> 
> Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>

Thanks. 
Stefan

> 
> > +
> > +        res = []
> > +        for v in gains:
> > +            res.append({
> > +                'ct': int(v[0]),
> > +                'gains': [float(1.0 / v[1]), float(1.0 / v[2])]
> > +            })
> > +
> > +        return res
> > diff --git a/utils/tuning/libtuning/modules/awb/rkisp1.py b/utils/tuning/libtuning/modules/awb/rkisp1.py
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..e3ddeb50c9a1
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/utils/tuning/libtuning/modules/awb/rkisp1.py
> > @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > +#
> > +# Copyright (C) 2024, Ideas On Board
> > +#
> > +# AWB module for tuning rkisp1
> > +
> > +from .awb import AWB
> > +
> > +import libtuning as lt
> > +
> > +
> > +class AWBRkISP1(AWB):
> > +    hr_name = 'AWB (RkISP1)'
> > +    out_name = 'Awb'
> > +
> > +    def __init__(self, **kwargs):
> > +        super().__init__(**kwargs)
> > +
> > +    def validate_config(self, config: dict) -> bool:
> > +        return True
> > +
> > +    def process(self, config: dict, images: list, outputs: dict) -> dict:
> > +        output = {}
> > +
> > +        output['gains'] = self.do_calculation(images)
> > +
> > +        return output
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Pinchart


More information about the libcamera-devel mailing list