[PATCH v3 0/3] libcamera: dma_buffer_allocator: Add support for using udmabuf to alloc dma-buffers
Hans de Goede
hdegoede at redhat.com
Mon Jun 3 14:04:23 CEST 2024
Hi,
On 6/3/24 1:59 PM, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> Quoting Hans de Goede (2024-06-03 12:12:56)
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Here is v3 of my patch-series to add /dev/udmabuf dma-buffer allocation
>> support. This is based on: https://patchwork.libcamera.org/patch/18922/
>>
>> Changes in v3:
>> - Rebase on top of latest master which includes Milan's "[PATCH v6 0/5]
>> Software ISP levels cleanup" series and Laurent's "[PATCH 0/3] libcamera:
>> Update to the new upstream subdev routing API" series
>> - Drop include/linux related patches (included in Laurent's merged series)
>> - Wrap comments and error message logging at 80 chars
>> - Style fixes to some comments
>> - Drop the unnecessary checking of the created dma-buf size
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - New patch: Add linux/udmabuf.h to libcamera's local kernel headers
>> - New patch: Rename DmaHeap class to DmaBufAllocator
>> - libcamera: DmaBufAllocator: Support allocating from /dev/udmabuf :
>> - Reword the commit message
>> - Add a new DmaBufAllocator::DmaBufAllocatorFlag::UDmaBuf type for udmabuf
>> - Drop unnecessary size != size check
>> - Reword log messages to be more like the DMA heap alloc path
>> - Move UniqueFD(ret) up so as to not leak the fd on errors
>> -New patch: software_isp: Allow using dma-buffers from /dev/udmabuf
>>
>> I did not push out a branch for this to libcamera-softisp because
>> of fdo gitlab maintenance. Note CI was happy with v2 and I see no reason
>> why v3 would be different.
>
> Thanks,
>
> I think we should probably wait for FDO to finish their maintenance
> anyway, but this looks ready to merge indeed.
>
> I'll run my script that will kick this through CI and then merge when
> that's completed.
>
> Though I think I might have to manually fix the patches as they apply
> with the double '---' trailers. I think git-am currently doesn't know to
> skip those ?
That is weird, by default git am should skip anything under the first
'---' cut-line for the commit message and it does do this for me.
Maybe you have some local .gitconfig setting influencing this ?
Regards,
Hans
>> Hans de Goede (3):
>> libcamera: Rename DmaHeap class to DmaBufAllocator
>> libcamera: DmaBufAllocator: Support allocating from /dev/udmabuf
>> libcamera: software_isp: Allow using dma-buffers from /dev/udmabuf
>>
>> .../libcamera/internal/dma_buf_allocator.h | 42 ++++
>> include/libcamera/internal/dma_heaps.h | 38 ---
>> include/libcamera/internal/meson.build | 2 +-
>> .../internal/software_isp/software_isp.h | 4 +-
>> src/libcamera/dma_buf_allocator.cpp | 233 ++++++++++++++++++
>> src/libcamera/dma_heaps.cpp | 165 -------------
>> src/libcamera/meson.build | 2 +-
>> src/libcamera/pipeline/rpi/vc4/vc4.cpp | 4 +-
>> src/libcamera/software_isp/software_isp.cpp | 6 +-
>> 9 files changed, 285 insertions(+), 211 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 include/libcamera/internal/dma_buf_allocator.h
>> delete mode 100644 include/libcamera/internal/dma_heaps.h
>> create mode 100644 src/libcamera/dma_buf_allocator.cpp
>> delete mode 100644 src/libcamera/dma_heaps.cpp
>>
>> --
>> 2.45.1
>>
>
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list