[PATCH 5/7] libcamera: mali-c55: Simplify bufferReady()
Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Mon Jun 17 07:13:07 CEST 2024
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 08:36:39PM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Scally (2024-06-13 16:59:47)
> > bufferReady() is needlessly complicated; simplify it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally at ideasonboard.com>
> > ---
> > src/libcamera/pipeline/mali-c55/mali-c55.cpp | 8 ++------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/libcamera/pipeline/mali-c55/mali-c55.cpp b/src/libcamera/pipeline/mali-c55/mali-c55.cpp
> > index 2b1d766a..910eac5e 100644
> > --- a/src/libcamera/pipeline/mali-c55/mali-c55.cpp
> > +++ b/src/libcamera/pipeline/mali-c55/mali-c55.cpp
> > @@ -1028,12 +1028,8 @@ void PipelineHandlerMaliC55::bufferReady(FrameBuffer *buffer)
> > {
> > Request *request = buffer->request();
> >
> > - completeBuffer(request, buffer);
> > -
> > - if (request->hasPendingBuffers())
> > - return;
> > -
> > - completeRequest(request);
> > + if (completeBuffer(request, buffer))
> > + completeRequest(request);
>
> is that just because there's only one stream supported currently?
>
> Or do I recall that completeBuffer tells us if there is still some
> buffers on the request maybe?
>
> Aha - right the PipelineHandlerBase does this for us and tells us if all
> the buffers in the request are completed.
A better commit message would have avoided researching that.
> Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> > }
> >
> > void PipelineHandlerMaliC55::registerMaliCamera(std::unique_ptr<MaliC55CameraData> data,
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list