[PATCH/RFC 22/32] libcamera: Add CameraSensor implementation for raw V4L2 sensors
Tomi Valkeinen
tomi.valkeinen at ideasonboard.com
Wed Mar 13 13:46:30 CET 2024
On 13/03/2024 14:20, Naushir Patuck wrote:
> ?> + case MediaBusFormatInfo::Type::Metadata:
>> + /*
>> + * Skip metadata streams that are not sensor embedded
>> + * data. The source stream reports a generic metadata
>> + * format, check the sink stream for the exact format.
>> + */
>> + formats = subdev_->formats(route.sink);
>> + if (formats.size() != 1)
>> + continue;
>
> Should this test be if (!formats.size()) insead? It might be possible
> to have multiple metadata types.
The driver in my branch is old and hacky. I should see what Laurent has
done with the imx219 in his branch, and possibly just take that one.
I think advertising only a single format makes sense here, as the
embedded format is defined by the video format.
>> +
>> + if (MediaBusFormatInfo::info(formats.cbegin()->first).type !=
>> + MediaBusFormatInfo::Type::EmbeddedData)
>> + continue;
>
> The IMX219 driver (from Tomi's kernel tree) advertises
> MEDIA_BUS_FMT_META_8 / MEDIA_BUS_FMT_META_10 formats for the embedded
> data stream, which translates to a type of
> MediaBusFormatInfo::Type::Metadata. Does the driver need updating, or
> should this check include MediaBusFormatInfo::Type::Metadata?
Laurent's version should also report those same mbus formats. Hmm, oh,
but it uses MEDIA_BUS_FMT_CCS_EMBEDDED for the internal pad...
Tomi
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list