[PATCH v3 04/17] ipa: libipa: vector: Add copy constructor and assignment operator
Barnabás Pőcze
pobrn at protonmail.com
Tue Nov 19 15:07:24 CET 2024
Hi
2024. november 19., kedd 9:38 keltezéssel, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com> írta:
> Hi Barnabás,
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 11:30:12PM +0000, Barnabás Pőcze wrote:
> > 2024. november 18., hétfő 23:16 keltezéssel, Laurent Pinchart írta:
> >
> > > It is useful to assign a value to an existing vector. Define a copy
> > > constructor and a copy assignment operator.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Milan Zamazal <mzamazal at redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes since v2:
> > >
> > > - Make copy constructor constexpr
> > > - Drop #include <algorithm>
> > > ---
> > > src/ipa/libipa/vector.cpp | 13 +++++++++++++
> > > src/ipa/libipa/vector.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/src/ipa/libipa/vector.cpp b/src/ipa/libipa/vector.cpp
> > > index d414ba97e41e..80f1758578f0 100644
> > > --- a/src/ipa/libipa/vector.cpp
> > > +++ b/src/ipa/libipa/vector.cpp
> > > @@ -46,6 +46,19 @@ namespace ipa {
> > > * The size of \a data must be equal to the dimension size Rows of the vector.
> > > */
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * \fn Vector::Vector(const Vector &other)
> > > + * \brief Construct a Vector by copying \a other
> > > + * \param[in] other The other Vector value
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * \fn Vector &Vector::operator=(const Vector &other)
> > > + * \brief Replace the content of the Vector with a copy of the content of \a other
> > > + * \param[in] other The other Vector value
> > > + * \return This Vector value
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * \fn T Vector::operator[](size_t i) const
> > > * \brief Index to an element in the vector
> > > diff --git a/src/ipa/libipa/vector.h b/src/ipa/libipa/vector.h
> > > index be568eadfeac..35fc9539dc99 100644
> > > --- a/src/ipa/libipa/vector.h
> > > +++ b/src/ipa/libipa/vector.h
> > > @@ -46,6 +46,18 @@ public:
> > > data_[i] = data[i];
> > > }
> > >
> > > + constexpr Vector(const Vector &other)
> > > + : data_(other.data_)
> > > + {
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + Vector &operator=(const Vector &other)
> > > + {
> > > + data_ = other.data_;
> > > +
> > > + return *this;
> > > + }
> >
> > Why not `... = default` in both cases? It seems to me that
> > the compiler generated functions would be appropriate.
>
> I will give it a try in v4.
Sorry, I have just now realized that these functions should already be implicitly
defined with the ` = default` definition, so there is probably no need to define
them at all unless I am missing something.
Regards,
Barnabás Pőcze
>
> > > +
> > > const T &operator[](size_t i) const
> > > {
> > > ASSERT(i < data_.size());
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list