[PATCH v3 04/17] ipa: libipa: vector: Add copy constructor and assignment operator

Barnabás Pőcze pobrn at protonmail.com
Tue Nov 19 15:07:24 CET 2024


Hi


2024. november 19., kedd 9:38 keltezéssel, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com> írta:

> Hi Barnabás,
> 
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 11:30:12PM +0000, Barnabás Pőcze wrote:
> > 2024. november 18., hétfő 23:16 keltezéssel, Laurent Pinchart írta:
> >
> > > It is useful to assign a value to an existing vector. Define a copy
> > > constructor and a copy assignment operator.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Milan Zamazal <mzamazal at redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > Changes since v2:
> > >
> > > - Make copy constructor constexpr
> > > - Drop #include <algorithm>
> > > ---
> > >  src/ipa/libipa/vector.cpp | 13 +++++++++++++
> > >  src/ipa/libipa/vector.h   | 12 ++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/src/ipa/libipa/vector.cpp b/src/ipa/libipa/vector.cpp
> > > index d414ba97e41e..80f1758578f0 100644
> > > --- a/src/ipa/libipa/vector.cpp
> > > +++ b/src/ipa/libipa/vector.cpp
> > > @@ -46,6 +46,19 @@ namespace ipa {
> > >   * The size of \a data must be equal to the dimension size Rows of the vector.
> > >   */
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * \fn Vector::Vector(const Vector &other)
> > > + * \brief Construct a Vector by copying \a other
> > > + * \param[in] other The other Vector value
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +/**
> > > + * \fn Vector &Vector::operator=(const Vector &other)
> > > + * \brief Replace the content of the Vector with a copy of the content of \a other
> > > + * \param[in] other The other Vector value
> > > + * \return This Vector value
> > > + */
> > > +
> > >  /**
> > >   * \fn T Vector::operator[](size_t i) const
> > >   * \brief Index to an element in the vector
> > > diff --git a/src/ipa/libipa/vector.h b/src/ipa/libipa/vector.h
> > > index be568eadfeac..35fc9539dc99 100644
> > > --- a/src/ipa/libipa/vector.h
> > > +++ b/src/ipa/libipa/vector.h
> > > @@ -46,6 +46,18 @@ public:
> > >  			data_[i] = data[i];
> > >  	}
> > >
> > > +	constexpr Vector(const Vector &other)
> > > +		: data_(other.data_)
> > > +	{
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	Vector &operator=(const Vector &other)
> > > +	{
> > > +		data_ = other.data_;
> > > +
> > > +		return *this;
> > > +	}
> >
> > Why not `... = default` in both cases? It seems to me that
> > the compiler generated functions would be appropriate.
> 
> I will give it a try in v4.

Sorry, I have just now realized that these functions should already be implicitly
defined with the ` = default` definition, so there is probably no need to define
them at all unless I am missing something.

Regards,
Barnabás Pőcze

> 
> > > +
> > >  	const T &operator[](size_t i) const
> > >  	{
> > >  		ASSERT(i < data_.size());
> 
> --
> Regards,
> 
> Laurent Pinchart


More information about the libcamera-devel mailing list