[PATCH v2 1/1] libcamera: add method to set thread affinity
Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Mon Oct 14 22:39:31 CEST 2024
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 03:00:09PM +0800, Cheng-Hao Yang wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 11:58 PM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 12, 2024 at 12:47:57PM +0000, Harvey Yang wrote:
> > > From: Han-Lin Chen <hanlinchen at chromium.org>
> > >
> > > Add method to set thread affinity to Thread class.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Han-Lin Chen <hanlinchen at chromium.org>
> > > Co-developed-by: Harvey Yang <chenghaoyang at chromium.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Harvey Yang <chenghaoyang at chromium.org>
> > > ---
> > > include/libcamera/base/thread.h | 6 +++++
> > > src/libcamera/base/thread.cpp | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/libcamera/base/thread.h b/include/libcamera/base/thread.h
> > > index 4f33de63d..c74fe102b 100644
> > > --- a/include/libcamera/base/thread.h
> > > +++ b/include/libcamera/base/thread.h
> > > @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ public:
> > > void exit(int code = 0);
> > > bool wait(utils::duration duration = utils::duration::max());
> > >
> > > + void setThreadAffinity(const std::vector<int> &cpus);
> > > +
> > > bool isRunning();
> > >
> > > Signal<> finished;
> > > @@ -54,6 +56,8 @@ private:
> > > void startThread();
> > > void finishThread();
> > >
> > > + void setThreadAffinityInternal();
> > > +
> > > void postMessage(std::unique_ptr<Message> msg, Object *receiver);
> > > void removeMessages(Object *receiver);
> > >
> > > @@ -67,6 +71,8 @@ private:
> > >
> > > std::thread thread_;
> > > ThreadData *data_;
> > > +
> > > + std::vector<int> cpus_;
> >
> > You can move this to ThreadData so it won't affect the API.
>
> Got it. Done.
>
> > > };
> > >
> > > } /* namespace libcamera */
> > > diff --git a/src/libcamera/base/thread.cpp b/src/libcamera/base/thread.cpp
> > > index 8735670b8..de5423eda 100644
> > > --- a/src/libcamera/base/thread.cpp
> > > +++ b/src/libcamera/base/thread.cpp
> > > @@ -254,6 +254,8 @@ void Thread::start()
> > > data_->exit_.store(false, std::memory_order_relaxed);
> > >
> > > thread_ = std::thread(&Thread::startThread, this);
> > > +
> > > + setThreadAffinityInternal();
> > > }
> > >
> > > void Thread::startThread()
> > > @@ -410,6 +412,51 @@ bool Thread::wait(utils::duration duration)
> > > return hasFinished;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/**
> > > + * \brief Set the CPU affinity mask of the thread
> > > + * \param[in] cpus The list of CPU indices that the thread is set affinity to
> >
> > As there's error handling in the function, you should describe what
> > happens in case of errors.
>
> Added description.
>
> > > + */
> > > +void Thread::setThreadAffinity(const std::vector<int> &cpus)
> >
> > Make it a span so the caller can also use an array instead of a vector.
>
> Done.
>
> > > +{
> > > + cpus_.clear();
> > > +
> > > + const unsigned int num_cpus = std::thread::hardware_concurrency();
> > > + for (const int &cpu : cpus) {
> > > + if (cpus_.size() == CPU_SETSIZE) {
> > > + LOG(Thread, Error) << "cpus_ already contains " << CPU_SETSIZE
> > > + << " cpus. Ignoring the rest.";
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (cpu >= static_cast<int>(num_cpus) || cpu < 0) {
> >
> > Why is the argument to the function a vector of int if entries can't be
> > negative ? Can't it be a vector of unsigned int instead ? You'll be able
> > to drop the cast here and drop the second check.
>
> Right, I thought CPU_SET only takes int, while I was wrong.
>
> > > + LOG(Thread, Error) << "Ignore an invalid cpu index: " << cpu;
> > > + continue;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + cpus_.push_back(cpu);
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + MutexLocker locker(data_->mutex_);
> > > + if (data_->running_)
> > > + setThreadAffinityInternal();
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void Thread::setThreadAffinityInternal()
> > > +{
> > > + if (cpus_.empty())
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + auto handle = thread_.native_handle();
> > > +
> > > + cpu_set_t cpuset;
> > > + CPU_ZERO(&cpuset);
> > > +
> > > + for (auto cpu : cpus_)
> > > + CPU_SET(cpu, &cpuset);
> >
> > Can't you compute the cpu_set_t and store it in the ThreadData class,
> > instead of storing a vector ? This can be done without holding the lock.
>
> Done, while I still think that it should only be updated when holding the
> lock, to avoid race conditions.
True. We could compute a local cpuset variable and then copy it to
cpuset_, but that's probably overkill. In practice I expect the vector
to contain a small number of elements.
> > > +
> > > + pthread_setaffinity_np(handle, sizeof(cpu_set_t), &cpuset);
> >
> > sizeof(cpu_set_t)
>
> Sorry, I don't get it: I think I already used `sizeof(cpu_set_t)`.
Sorry, I meant sizeof(cpuset).
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /**
> > > * \brief Check if the thread is running
> > > *
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list