[RFC PATCH v3 19/21] apps: lc-compliance: Run request completion handler in "main" thread
Jacopo Mondi
jacopo.mondi at ideasonboard.com
Thu Feb 6 18:33:17 CET 2025
Hi Barnabás
On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 11:51:41AM +0000, Barnabás Pőcze wrote:
> Currently, `Capture::requestCompleted()` runs in the `CameraManager`'s
> thread. This makes it a bit more complicated to use googletest and
> report errors in those callbacks since lc-compliance sets up
> googletest to throw exceptions on fatal errors / test skip, but
> those exceptions are only caught on the "main" thread, the one
> running the test suite.
>
> To minimize the burden of dealing with synchronization in tests,
> execute `Capture::requestCompleted()` in the event loop's thread
> by utilizing `EventLoop::callLater()`.
>
> Signed-off-by: Barnabás Pőcze <pobrn at protonmail.com>
You mentioned an issue with libevent interaction in v2 ? What is it
and how has it been fixed ?
The patch itself looks good to me
Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi at ideasonboard.com>
Thanks
j
> ---
> src/apps/lc-compliance/helpers/capture.cpp | 24 +++++++++++++---------
> src/apps/lc-compliance/helpers/capture.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/helpers/capture.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/helpers/capture.cpp
> index 4a8627662..5032470d9 100644
> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/helpers/capture.cpp
> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/helpers/capture.cpp
> @@ -127,17 +127,13 @@ void Capture::prepareRequests()
> }
> }
>
> -int Capture::queueRequest(libcamera::Request *request)
> +void Capture::queueRequest(libcamera::Request *request)
> {
> if (queueLimit_ && queueCount_ >= *queueLimit_)
> - return 0;
> -
> - int ret = camera_->queueRequest(request);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + return;
>
> + ASSERT_EQ(camera_->queueRequest(request), 0);
> queueCount_ += 1;
> - return 0;
> }
>
> void Capture::requestComplete(Request *request)
> @@ -152,8 +148,7 @@ void Capture::requestComplete(Request *request)
> << "Request didn't complete successfully";
>
> request->reuse(Request::ReuseBuffers);
> - if (queueRequest(request))
> - loop_->exit(-EINVAL);
> + queueRequest(request);
> }
>
> void Capture::start()
> @@ -172,7 +167,14 @@ void Capture::start()
>
> ASSERT_TRUE(allocator_.allocated());
>
> - camera_->requestCompleted.connect(this, &Capture::requestComplete);
> + camera_->requestCompleted.connect(this, [this](libcamera::Request *request) {
> + /* Runs in the CameraManager thread. */
> +
> + loop_->callLater([this, request] {
> + /* Run handler in the context of the event loop. */
> + requestComplete(request);
> + }, reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(this));
> + });
>
> ASSERT_EQ(camera_->start(), 0) << "Failed to start camera";
> }
> @@ -188,6 +190,8 @@ void Capture::stop()
>
> requests_.clear();
>
> + loop_->cancelLater(reinterpret_cast<std::uintptr_t>(this));
> +
> for (const auto &cfg : *config_) {
> int ret = allocator_.free(cfg.stream());
> EXPECT_EQ(ret, 0) << "Failed to free buffers associated with stream";
> diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/helpers/capture.h b/src/apps/lc-compliance/helpers/capture.h
> index 48a8dadcb..dacce1fe2 100644
> --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/helpers/capture.h
> +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/helpers/capture.h
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ private:
> void stop();
>
> void prepareRequests();
> - int queueRequest(libcamera::Request *request);
> + void queueRequest(libcamera::Request *request);
> void requestComplete(libcamera::Request *request);
>
> std::shared_ptr<libcamera::Camera> camera_;
> --
> 2.48.1
>
>
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list