[RFC PATCH v1 09/12] apps: lc-compliance: Check number of buffers in allocator
Barnabás Pőcze
pobrn at protonmail.com
Fri Jan 10 10:46:23 CET 2025
Hi
2025. január 7., kedd 18:08 keltezéssel, Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi at ideasonboard.com> írta:
> Hi Barnabas
>
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 03:08:41PM +0000, Barnabás Pőcze wrote:
> > Do a consistency check to ensure that the return value
> > matches the number of buffers actually created.
>
> Could you please make sure your commit messages in the series span to
> up to 72 cols ?
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Barnabás Pőcze <pobrn at protonmail.com>
> > ---
> > src/apps/lc-compliance/helpers/capture.cpp | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/apps/lc-compliance/helpers/capture.cpp b/src/apps/lc-compliance/helpers/capture.cpp
> > index b473e0773..5cc7635f7 100644
> > --- a/src/apps/lc-compliance/helpers/capture.cpp
> > +++ b/src/apps/lc-compliance/helpers/capture.cpp
> > @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ void Capture::start()
> >
> > ASSERT_GE(count, 0) << "Failed to allocate buffers";
> > EXPECT_EQ(count, config_->at(0).bufferCount) << "Allocated less buffers than expected";
> > + ASSERT_EQ(count, allocator_.buffers(stream).size()) << "Unexpected number of buffers in allocator";
>
> mmm, FrameBufferAllocator::allocate() returns the number of allocated
> buffers, if this doesn't match
>
> allocator_.buffers(stream).size())
>
> it's likely a problem in the FrameBufferAllocator implementation
> rather than an issue here.
I think there should be some kind of a consistency check either in
`FrameBufferAllocator::allocate()` or at least here.
Regards,
Barnabás Pőcze
>
> Unless I missed something, I would drop this patch
>
> >
> > camera_->requestCompleted.connect(this, &Capture::requestComplete);
> >
> > --
> > 2.47.1
> >
> >
>
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list