[PATCH v3 4/4] libcamera: pipeline: uvcvideo: Fix `ExposureTime` control handling
Barnabás Pőcze
barnabas.pocze at ideasonboard.com
Fri Mar 21 15:33:59 CET 2025
Hi
2025. 03. 21. 15:17 keltezéssel, Jacopo Mondi írta:
> Hi Barnabás
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 06:42:48PM +0100, Barnabás Pőcze wrote:
>> The documentation of `ExposureTime` states that its value is ignored if
>> `ExposureTimeMode` is not manual. This is currently not handled, and if
>> `ExposureTimeMode` is automatic and `ExposureTime` is set, then the
>> controls will be rejected, as expected.
>>
>> Only try to set `V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_ABSOLUTE` if the current exposure mode
>> is manual. To be able to handle requests that set both `ExposureTime{,Mode}`,
>> process `ExposureTimeMode` first directly in `processControls()`, and store
>> this new mode in a temporary location. Then have `processControl()` act on
>> this temporary state, and only persist the temporary state if `setControls()`
>> on the video device succeeds.
>>
>> Bug: https://bugs.libcamera.org/show_bug.cgi?id=242
>> Signed-off-by: Barnabás Pőcze <barnabas.pocze at ideasonboard.com>
>> ---
>> src/libcamera/pipeline/uvcvideo/uvcvideo.cpp | 52 ++++++++++++--------
>> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/libcamera/pipeline/uvcvideo/uvcvideo.cpp b/src/libcamera/pipeline/uvcvideo/uvcvideo.cpp
>> index 7d882ebe1..22d286e49 100644
>> --- a/src/libcamera/pipeline/uvcvideo/uvcvideo.cpp
>> +++ b/src/libcamera/pipeline/uvcvideo/uvcvideo.cpp
>> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ public:
>> bool match(DeviceEnumerator *enumerator) override;
>>
>> private:
>> - int processControl(const UVCCameraData *data, ControlList *controls,
>> + int processControl(const UVCCameraData::State &state, ControlList *controls,
>> unsigned int id, const ControlValue &value);
>> int processControls(UVCCameraData *data, Request *request);
>>
>> @@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ void PipelineHandlerUVC::stopDevice(Camera *camera)
>> data->state_.reset();
>> }
>>
>> -int PipelineHandlerUVC::processControl(const UVCCameraData *data, ControlList *controls,
>> +int PipelineHandlerUVC::processControl(const UVCCameraData::State &state, ControlList *controls,
>> unsigned int id, const ControlValue &value)
>> {
>> uint32_t cid;
>> @@ -378,26 +378,13 @@ int PipelineHandlerUVC::processControl(const UVCCameraData *data, ControlList *c
>> }
>>
>> case V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_AUTO: {
>> - std::optional<v4l2_exposure_auto_type> mode;
>> -
>> - switch (value.get<int32_t>()) {
>> - case controls::ExposureTimeModeAuto:
>> - mode = data->autoExposureMode_;
>> - break;
>> - case controls::ExposureTimeModeManual:
>> - mode = data->manualExposureMode_;
>> - break;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (!mode)
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> -
>> - controls->set(V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_AUTO, static_cast<int32_t>(*mode));
>> + /* Handled directly in `processControls()`. */
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> case V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_ABSOLUTE:
>> - controls->set(cid, value.get<int32_t>() / 100);
>> + if (state.exp == controls::ExposureTimeModeManual)
>> + controls->set(cid, value.get<int32_t>() / 100);
>> break;
>>
>> case V4L2_CID_CONTRAST:
>> @@ -428,9 +415,30 @@ int PipelineHandlerUVC::processControl(const UVCCameraData *data, ControlList *c
>> int PipelineHandlerUVC::processControls(UVCCameraData *data, Request *request)
>> {
>> ControlList controls(data->video_->controls());
>> + const auto &reqControls = request->controls();
>> + auto newState = data->state_;
>> +
>> + if (const auto exp = reqControls.get(controls::ExposureTimeMode)) {
>> + std::optional<v4l2_exposure_auto_type> mode;
>>
>> - for (const auto &[id, value] : request->controls())
>> - processControl(data, &controls, id, value);
>> + switch (*exp) {
>> + case controls::ExposureTimeModeAuto:
>> + mode = data->autoExposureMode_;
>> + break;
>> + case controls::ExposureTimeModeManual:
>> + mode = data->manualExposureMode_;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!mode)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + controls.set(V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE_AUTO, static_cast<int32_t>(*mode));
>> + newState.exp = static_cast<controls::ExposureTimeModeEnum>(*exp);
>
> Can't you just update data->state before calling processControl to
> avoid passing newState to that function ?
If the controls cannot be set, then I think the state should not be changed, this
is why it operates on a copy, which is only persisted after `setControls()` succeeds.
Regards,
Barnabás Pőcze
>
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (const auto &[id, value] : reqControls)
>> + processControl(newState, &controls, id, value);
>>
>> for (const auto &ctrl : controls)
>> LOG(UVC, Debug)
>> @@ -443,7 +451,9 @@ int PipelineHandlerUVC::processControls(UVCCameraData *data, Request *request)
>> return ret < 0 ? ret : -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> - return ret;
>> + data->state_ = newState;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> }
>>
>> int PipelineHandlerUVC::queueRequestDevice(Camera *camera, Request *request)
>> --
>> 2.48.1
>>
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list