[libcamera-devel] [PATCH 3/5] test: v4l2_device: Provide buffer sharing test

Kieran Bingham kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com
Tue Feb 12 10:47:45 CET 2019


Hi Laurent,

On 12/02/2019 09:20, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Kieran,
> 
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 11:52:35AM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
>> On 08/02/2019 17:28, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 09:21:17PM +0000, Kieran Bingham wrote:
>>>> Obtain two V4L2Devices and use one to obtain a BufferPool.
>>>>
>>>> Propogate the formats from the first to the second device and then commence
>>>
>>> s/Propogate/Propagate/
>>
>> Ack.
>>
>>>> sending buffers between the two devices in a ping-pong fashion.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  test/v4l2_device/buffer_sharing.cpp | 178 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  test/v4l2_device/meson.build        |   1 +
>>>>  2 files changed, 179 insertions(+)
>>>>  create mode 100644 test/v4l2_device/buffer_sharing.cpp
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/test/v4l2_device/buffer_sharing.cpp b/test/v4l2_device/buffer_sharing.cpp
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..0e96f7b894bd
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/test/v4l2_device/buffer_sharing.cpp
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,178 @@
>>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later */
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2019, Google Inc.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * libcamera V4L2 API tests
>>>
>>> Should this be updated ?
>>
>> It's part of the V4L2 API tests, no?
> 
> Sure, but it wouldn't hurt to be a tad more specific :-)
> 
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <iostream>
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <libcamera/buffer.h>
>>>> +#include <libcamera/camera_manager.h>
>>>> +#include <libcamera/event_dispatcher.h>
>>>> +#include <libcamera/timer.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#include "v4l2_device_test.h"
>>>> +
>>>> +#include "log.h"
>>>> +
>>>> +LOG_DEFINE_CATEGORY(Test)
>>>
>>> The logger is internal to libcamera, let's not use it for tests. We
>>> should define a test-specific logging infrastructure instead, to suit
>>> the specific needs of tests.
>>
>> Ah yes - I should have dropped this - That part was just me playing
>> around with the code.
>>
>> It works in this instance because this code is an 'internal' test and
>> thus has access to all internals including the logging mechanism - but I
>> agree the Tests need their own.
>>
>> Care to write a TestLoggger sometime so we can actually fix all this up?
> 
> I've added a task for that, let's see who can tackle it first :-)
> 
>>>> +class BufferSharingTest : public V4L2DeviceTest
>>>> +{
>>>> +public:
>>>> +	BufferSharingTest()
>>>> +		: output_(nullptr), framesCapture(0), framesOutput(0){};
>>>> +
>>>> +private:
>>>> +	const unsigned int bufferCount = 4;
>>>> +
>>>> +	V4L2Device *output_;
>>>> +	std::shared_ptr<MediaDevice> secondMedia_;
>>>> +
>>>> +	unsigned int framesCapture;
>>>> +	unsigned int framesOutput;
>>>> +
>>>> +protected:
>>>> +	int init()
>>>> +	{
>>>> +		int ret = V4L2DeviceTest::init();
>>>> +		if (ret)
>>>> +			return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +		DeviceMatch uvcvideo("uvcvideo");
>>>> +		uvcvideo.add("Logitech BRIO");
>>>
>>> This is *very* specific to your setup, we need a more generic solution.
>>> One option is to switch to vivid, as it has both a video capture and a
>>> video output device.
>>
>> Yes, of course it is - as was detailed in the cover letter.
>>
>> The main purpose of this posting is to support Jacopo in his continued
>> development on the IPU3 which needs buffer imports.
> 
> Do you think it would be lots of work to move this to vivid ?

You know my initial blocker was my inaccurate association of VIVID/VIMC.
and VIVID != VIMC which is not packaged by my distro :S
 (I should file a bug on Ubuntu)

kbingham at Q:~/projects$ sudo modprobe vimc
modprobe: FATAL: Module vimc not found in directory
/lib/modules/4.18.0-14-generic
kbingham at Q:~/projects$ sudo modprobe vivid
kbingham at Q:~/projects$ lsv4l2
video0: HP Wide Vision FHD Camera: HP W
video1: HP Wide Vision FHD Camera: HP W
video2: HP Wide Vision FHD Camera: HP I
video3: HP Wide Vision FHD Camera: HP I
video4: vivid-000-vid-cap
video5: vivid-000-vid-out


So I have vivid - but it does not provide a media device. So we can't
enumerate it with our current DeviceMatch...

I hear rumours that Linux v4.20 now provides a media device for VIVID
... should we restrict our tests to v4.20+ or add support for
non-media-controller devices?



>>>> +		secondMedia_ = std::move(enumerator_->search(uvcvideo));
>>>> +		if (!secondMedia_) {
>>>> +			LOG(Test, Info) << "No Brio found";
>>>> +			return TestSkip;
>>>> +		}
>>>> +
>>>> +		secondMedia_->acquire();
>>>> +
>>>> +		MediaEntity *entity = secondMedia_->defaultEntity();
>>>> +		if (!entity)
>>>> +			return TestFail;
>>>> +
>>>> +		output_ = new V4L2Device(entity);
>>>> +		if (!output_)
>>>> +			return TestFail;
>>>> +
>>>> +		ret = output_->open();
>>>> +		if (ret)
>>>> +			return TestFail;
>>>
>>> How about adding an openDevice(const DeviceMatch &dm, ...) function to
>>> V4L2DeviceTest to do all this, and call it both from
>>> V4L2DeviceTest::init() and here ?
>>
>> This function certainly got long fast. A helper would be useful yes.
>>
>>>> +		V4L2DeviceFormat format;
>>>> +
>>>> +		ret = dev_->getFormat(&format);
>>>> +		if (ret) {
>>>> +			return TestFail;
>>>> +		}
>>>> +
>>>> +		LOG(Test, Info) << "Successfully obtained format from source";
>>>> +
>>>> +		ret = output_->setFormat(&format);
>>>> +		if (ret)
>>>> +			return TestFail;
>>>> +
>>>> +		LOG(Test, Info) << "Successfully set format to output";
>>>> +
>>>> +		pool_.createBuffers(bufferCount);
>>>> +
>>>> +		ret = dev_->exportBuffers(bufferCount, &pool_);
>>>> +		if (ret)
>>>> +			return TestFail;
>>>> +
>>>> +		ret = output_->importBuffers(&pool_);
>>>> +		if (ret) {
>>>> +			std::cerr << "Failed to import buffers" << std::endl;
>>>> +			return TestFail;
>>>> +		}
>>>> +
>>>> +		return 0;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> +	void receiveSourceBuffer(Buffer *buffer)
>>>> +	{
>>>> +		std::cout << "Received source buffer: " << buffer->index()
>>>> +			  << " sequence " << buffer->sequence() << std::endl;
>>>> +
>>>> +		output_->queueBuffer(buffer);
>>>> +		framesCapture++;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> +	void receiveDestinationBuffer(Buffer *buffer)
>>>> +	{
>>>> +		std::cout << "Received destination buffer: " << buffer->index()
>>>> +			  << " sequence " << buffer->sequence() << std::endl;
>>>> +
>>>> +		dev_->queueBuffer(buffer);
>>>> +		framesOutput++;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> +	int run()
>>>> +	{
>>>> +		EventDispatcher *dispatcher = CameraManager::instance()->eventDispatcher();
>>>> +		Timer timeout;
>>>> +		int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +		dev_->bufferReady.connect(this, &BufferSharingTest::receiveSourceBuffer);
>>>> +		output_->bufferReady.connect(this, &BufferSharingTest::receiveDestinationBuffer);
>>>> +
>>>> +		/* Queue all the buffers to the device. */
>>>> +		for (Buffer &b : pool_.buffers()) {
>>>> +			if (dev_->queueBuffer(&b))
>>>> +				return TestFail;
>>>> +		}
>>>> +
>>>> +		ret = dev_->streamOn();
>>>> +		if (ret)
>>>> +			return TestFail;
>>>> +
>>>> +		ret = output_->streamOn();
>>>> +		if (ret)
>>>> +			return TestFail;
>>>> +
>>>> +		timeout.start(5000);
>>>> +		while (timeout.isRunning())
>>>> +			dispatcher->processEvents();
>>>> +
>>>> +		if ((framesCapture < 1) || (framesOutput < 1)) {
>>>> +			std::cout << "Failed to process any frames within timeout." << std::endl;
>>>> +			return TestFail;
>>>> +		}
>>>> +
>>>> +		if ((framesCapture < 30) || (framesOutput < 30)) {
>>>> +			std::cout << "Failed to process 30 frames within timeout." << std::endl;
>>>> +			return TestFail;
>>>> +		}
>>>> +
>>>> +		std::cout
>>>> +			<< "Processed " << framesCapture << " capture frames"
>>>> +			<< " and " << framesOutput << " output frames"
>>>> +			<< std::endl;
>>>> +
>>>> +		ret = dev_->streamOff();
>>>> +		if (ret)
>>>> +			return TestFail;
>>>> +
>>>> +		ret = output_->streamOff();
>>>> +		if (ret)
>>>> +			return TestFail;
>>>> +
>>>> +		return TestPass;
>>>> +	}
>>>> +
>>>> +	void cleanup()
>>>> +	{
>>>> +		if (secondMedia_)
>>>> +			secondMedia_->release();
>>>> +
>>>> +		delete output_;
>>>> +
>>>> +		V4L2DeviceTest::cleanup();
>>>> +	}
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +TEST_REGISTER(BufferSharingTest);
>>>> diff --git a/test/v4l2_device/meson.build b/test/v4l2_device/meson.build
>>>> index ec2c7f9f11ff..9f7a7545ac9b 100644
>>>> --- a/test/v4l2_device/meson.build
>>>> +++ b/test/v4l2_device/meson.build
>>>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ v4l2_device_tests = [
>>>>    [ 'request_buffers',    'request_buffers.cpp' ],
>>>>    [ 'stream_on_off',      'stream_on_off.cpp' ],
>>>>    [ 'capture_async',      'capture_async.cpp' ],
>>>> +  [ 'buffer_sharing',     'buffer_sharing.cpp' ],
>>>>  ]
>>>>  
>>>>  foreach t : v4l2_device_tests
> 

-- 
Regards
--
Kieran


More information about the libcamera-devel mailing list