[libcamera-devel] [PATCH 3/7] test: yaml_parser: Extend tests to cover the iterator API

Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Fri Jun 17 17:55:07 CEST 2022


Hi Jacopo,

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 05:15:25PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 05:23:59PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart via libcamera-devel wrote:
> > Test iteration over lists and dictionaries to test the YamlObject
> > iterator API.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> > ---
> >  test/yaml-parser.cpp | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/test/yaml-parser.cpp b/test/yaml-parser.cpp
> > index 5ff4c3236dbf..ab6e9a01c0fe 100644
> > --- a/test/yaml-parser.cpp
> > +++ b/test/yaml-parser.cpp
> > @@ -5,11 +5,14 @@
> >   * yaml-parser.cpp - YAML parser operations tests
> >   */
> >
> > +#include <array>
> >  #include <iostream>
> > +#include <map>
> >  #include <string>
> >  #include <unistd.h>
> >
> >  #include <libcamera/base/file.h>
> > +#include <libcamera/base/utils.h>
> >
> >  #include "libcamera/internal/yaml_parser.h"
> >
> > @@ -373,15 +376,39 @@ protected:
> >  			return TestFail;
> >  		}
> >
> > -		if (listObj.size() > 2) {
> > +		static constexpr std::array<const char *, 2> listValues{
> > +			"James",
> > +			"Mary",
> > +		};
> > +
> > +		if (listObj.size() != listValues.size()) {
> >  			cerr << "List object parse with wrong size" << std::endl;
> >  			return TestFail;
> >  		}
> >
> > -		if (listObj[0].get<string>("") != "James" ||
> > -		    listObj[1].get<string>("") != "Mary") {
> > -			cerr << "List object parse as wrong value" << std::endl;
> > -			return TestFail;
> > +		unsigned int i = 0;
> > +		for (auto &elem : listObj.asList()) {
> > +			if (i >= listValues.size()) {
> > +				std::cerr << "Too many elements in list during iteration"
> > +					  << std::endl;
> > +				return TestFail;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			std::string value = listValues[i];
> > +
> > +			if (&elem != &listObj[i]) {
> > +				std::cerr << "List element " << i << " has wrong address"
> > +					  << std::endl;
> > +				return TestFail;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			if (elem.get<std::string>("") != value) {
> > +				std::cerr << "List element " << i << " has wrong value"
> > +					  << std::endl;
> > +				return TestFail;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			i++;
> >  		}
> >
> >  		/* Test dictionary object */
> > @@ -422,19 +449,60 @@ protected:
> >  			return TestFail;
> >  		}
> >
> > -		if (dictObj.size() != 3) {
> > -			cerr << "Dictionary object parse with wrong size" << std::endl;
> > +		std::map<std::string, int> dictValues{ {
> > +			{ "a", 1 },
> > +			{ "b", 2 },
> > +			{ "c", 3 },
> > +		} };
> > +
> > +		size_t dictSize = dictValues.size();
> > +
> > +		if (dictObj.size() != dictSize) {
> > +			cerr << "Dictionary object has wrong size" << std::endl;
> >  			return TestFail;
> >  		}
> >
> > +		i = 0;
> > +		for (const auto &[key, elem] : dictObj.asDict()) {
> > +			if (i >= dictSize) {
> > +				std::cerr << "Too many elements in dictionary during iteration"
> > +					  << std::endl;
> > +				return TestFail;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			const auto item = dictValues.find(key);
> > +			if (item == dictValues.end()) {
> > +				std::cerr << "Dictionary key " << i << " has wrong value"
> > +					  << std::endl;
> > +				return TestFail;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			if (&elem != &dictObj[key]) {
> > +				std::cerr << "Dictionary element " << i << " has wrong address"
> > +					  << std::endl;
> > +				return TestFail;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			if (elem.get<int32_t>(0) != item->second) {
> > +				std::cerr << "Dictionary element " << i << " has wrong value"
> > +					  << std::endl;
> > +				return TestFail;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			/*
> > +			 * Erase the item to make sure that each iteration
> > +			 * produces a different value.
> > +			 */
> > +			dictValues.erase(item);
> 
> Can the iteration return the same element twice ?

It's not supposed to. That's why this is trying to catch, without the
erase, if the iterator returned the same element three times, the test
would pass.

> With this clarified
> Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo at jmondi.org>
> 
> > +			i++;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		/* Make sure utils::map_keys() works on the adapter. */
> > +		(void)utils::map_keys(dictObj.asDict());
> > +
> >  		auto memeberNames = dictObj.memberNames();
> >  		sort(memeberNames.begin(), memeberNames.end());
> >
> > -		if (memeberNames.size() != 3) {
> > -			cerr << "Dictionary object fail to extra member names" << std::endl;
> > -			return TestFail;
> > -		}
> > -
> >  		if (memeberNames[0] != "a" ||
> >  		    memeberNames[1] != "b" ||
> >  		    memeberNames[2] != "c") {
> > @@ -442,13 +510,6 @@ protected:
> >  			return TestFail;
> >  		}
> >
> > -		if (dictObj["a"].get<int32_t>(0) != 1 ||
> > -		    dictObj["b"].get<int32_t>(0) != 2 ||
> > -		    dictObj["c"].get<int32_t>(0) != 3) {
> > -			cerr << "Dictionary object fail to parse member value" << std::endl;
> > -			return TestFail;
> > -		}
> > -
> >  		/* Test leveled objects */
> >  		auto &level1Obj = (*root)["level1"];
> >

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


More information about the libcamera-devel mailing list