[libcamera-devel] [PATCH 3/7] test: yaml_parser: Extend tests to cover the iterator API
Hanlin Chen
hanlinchen at chromium.org
Mon Jun 20 14:06:56 CEST 2022
Hi Laurent,
Reviewed-by: Han-Lin Chen <hanlinchen at chromium.org>
Thanks.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 11:55 PM Laurent Pinchart via libcamera-devel
<libcamera-devel at lists.libcamera.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Jacopo,
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 05:15:25PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 05:23:59PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart via libcamera-devel wrote:
> > > Test iteration over lists and dictionaries to test the YamlObject
> > > iterator API.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
> > > ---
> > > test/yaml-parser.cpp | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > > 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/test/yaml-parser.cpp b/test/yaml-parser.cpp
> > > index 5ff4c3236dbf..ab6e9a01c0fe 100644
> > > --- a/test/yaml-parser.cpp
> > > +++ b/test/yaml-parser.cpp
> > > @@ -5,11 +5,14 @@
> > > * yaml-parser.cpp - YAML parser operations tests
> > > */
> > >
> > > +#include <array>
> > > #include <iostream>
> > > +#include <map>
> > > #include <string>
> > > #include <unistd.h>
> > >
> > > #include <libcamera/base/file.h>
> > > +#include <libcamera/base/utils.h>
> > >
> > > #include "libcamera/internal/yaml_parser.h"
> > >
> > > @@ -373,15 +376,39 @@ protected:
> > > return TestFail;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (listObj.size() > 2) {
> > > + static constexpr std::array<const char *, 2> listValues{
> > > + "James",
> > > + "Mary",
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + if (listObj.size() != listValues.size()) {
> > > cerr << "List object parse with wrong size" << std::endl;
> > > return TestFail;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (listObj[0].get<string>("") != "James" ||
> > > - listObj[1].get<string>("") != "Mary") {
> > > - cerr << "List object parse as wrong value" << std::endl;
> > > - return TestFail;
> > > + unsigned int i = 0;
> > > + for (auto &elem : listObj.asList()) {
> > > + if (i >= listValues.size()) {
> > > + std::cerr << "Too many elements in list during iteration"
> > > + << std::endl;
> > > + return TestFail;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + std::string value = listValues[i];
> > > +
> > > + if (&elem != &listObj[i]) {
> > > + std::cerr << "List element " << i << " has wrong address"
> > > + << std::endl;
> > > + return TestFail;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (elem.get<std::string>("") != value) {
> > > + std::cerr << "List element " << i << " has wrong value"
> > > + << std::endl;
> > > + return TestFail;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + i++;
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* Test dictionary object */
> > > @@ -422,19 +449,60 @@ protected:
> > > return TestFail;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (dictObj.size() != 3) {
> > > - cerr << "Dictionary object parse with wrong size" << std::endl;
> > > + std::map<std::string, int> dictValues{ {
> > > + { "a", 1 },
> > > + { "b", 2 },
> > > + { "c", 3 },
> > > + } };
> > > +
> > > + size_t dictSize = dictValues.size();
> > > +
> > > + if (dictObj.size() != dictSize) {
> > > + cerr << "Dictionary object has wrong size" << std::endl;
> > > return TestFail;
> > > }
> > >
> > > + i = 0;
> > > + for (const auto &[key, elem] : dictObj.asDict()) {
> > > + if (i >= dictSize) {
> > > + std::cerr << "Too many elements in dictionary during iteration"
> > > + << std::endl;
> > > + return TestFail;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + const auto item = dictValues.find(key);
> > > + if (item == dictValues.end()) {
> > > + std::cerr << "Dictionary key " << i << " has wrong value"
> > > + << std::endl;
> > > + return TestFail;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (&elem != &dictObj[key]) {
> > > + std::cerr << "Dictionary element " << i << " has wrong address"
> > > + << std::endl;
> > > + return TestFail;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (elem.get<int32_t>(0) != item->second) {
> > > + std::cerr << "Dictionary element " << i << " has wrong value"
> > > + << std::endl;
> > > + return TestFail;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Erase the item to make sure that each iteration
> > > + * produces a different value.
> > > + */
> > > + dictValues.erase(item);
> >
> > Can the iteration return the same element twice ?
>
> It's not supposed to. That's why this is trying to catch, without the
> erase, if the iterator returned the same element three times, the test
> would pass.
>
> > With this clarified
> > Reviewed-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo at jmondi.org>
> >
> > > + i++;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + /* Make sure utils::map_keys() works on the adapter. */
> > > + (void)utils::map_keys(dictObj.asDict());
> > > +
> > > auto memeberNames = dictObj.memberNames();
> > > sort(memeberNames.begin(), memeberNames.end());
> > >
> > > - if (memeberNames.size() != 3) {
> > > - cerr << "Dictionary object fail to extra member names" << std::endl;
> > > - return TestFail;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > if (memeberNames[0] != "a" ||
> > > memeberNames[1] != "b" ||
> > > memeberNames[2] != "c") {
> > > @@ -442,13 +510,6 @@ protected:
> > > return TestFail;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (dictObj["a"].get<int32_t>(0) != 1 ||
> > > - dictObj["b"].get<int32_t>(0) != 2 ||
> > > - dictObj["c"].get<int32_t>(0) != 3) {
> > > - cerr << "Dictionary object fail to parse member value" << std::endl;
> > > - return TestFail;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > /* Test leveled objects */
> > > auto &level1Obj = (*root)["level1"];
> > >
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Laurent Pinchart
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list