[libcamera-devel] [PATCH] py: Support controls that are ControlTypeNone
Kieran Bingham
kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com
Fri Sep 30 17:37:34 CEST 2022
Quoting David Plowman via libcamera-devel (2022-09-30 13:18:12)
> Such controls can now be created when a control doesn't have a
> reasonable or obvious default value. We support them using Python's
> "None" value, rather than generating a runtime error.
>
This sounds correct and reasonable to me.
This looks like the sort of thing that should have a unit test. I assume
you're testing it with picamera2 already though.
Tomi, Have we got anywhere we can add tests for things like this ?
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham at ideasonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Plowman <david.plowman at raspberrypi.com>
> ---
> src/py/libcamera/py_helpers.cpp | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/py/libcamera/py_helpers.cpp b/src/py/libcamera/py_helpers.cpp
> index 45aecce9..f685e606 100644
> --- a/src/py/libcamera/py_helpers.cpp
> +++ b/src/py/libcamera/py_helpers.cpp
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ py::object controlValueToPy(const ControlValue &cv)
> return py::cast(v);
> }
> case ControlTypeNone:
> + return py::none();
> default:
> throw std::runtime_error("Unsupported ControlValue type");
> }
> @@ -91,6 +92,7 @@ ControlValue pyToControlValue(const py::object &ob, ControlType type)
> case ControlTypeSize:
> return ControlValue(ob.cast<Size>());
> case ControlTypeNone:
> + return ControlValue();
> default:
> throw std::runtime_error("Control type not implemented");
> }
> --
> 2.30.2
>
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list