[PATCH v4 12/23] libtuning: Be a bit more verbose

Dan Scally dan.scally at ideasonboard.com
Fri Jul 5 18:01:39 CEST 2024


Hi Stefan

On 05/07/2024 15:41, Stefan Klug wrote:
> Print a info on every image that gets processed and a warning on every
> image that gets ignored.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Klug <stefan.klug at ideasonboard.com>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder at ideasonboard.com>
> ---
>   utils/tuning/libtuning/utils.py | 2 ++
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/utils/tuning/libtuning/utils.py b/utils/tuning/libtuning/utils.py
> index 93c6c94ea2b0..dacda11312a2 100644
> --- a/utils/tuning/libtuning/utils.py
> +++ b/utils/tuning/libtuning/utils.py
> @@ -92,7 +92,9 @@ def load_images(input_dir: str, config: dict, load_nonlsc: bool, load_lsc: bool)
>       images = []
>       for f in files:
>           color, lux, lsc_only = _parse_image_filename(f)
> +        logger.info(f'Process image "{f.name}" (color={color}, lux={lux}, lsc_only={lsc_only})')
>           if color is None:
> +            logger.warning(f'Ignoring "{f.name}" as it has no associated color temperature')
>               continue


Personally I think print the info line after the continue so that a file we're ignoring doesn't get 
both, but either way:


Reviewed-by: Daniel Scally <dan.scally at ideasonboard.com>

>   
>           # Skip lsc image if we don't need it


More information about the libcamera-devel mailing list