[PATCH 1/3] ipa: libipa: Add Lux helper
Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Mon Jun 17 00:56:30 CEST 2024
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 11:11:24AM +0100, Daniel Scally wrote:
> Hi Paul - thanks for the patches
>
> On 12/04/2024 10:16, Paul Elder wrote:
> > Add a Lux helper to libipa that does the estimation of the lux level
> > given gain, exposure, aperture, and luminance histogram. The helper also
> > handles reading the reference values from the tuning file. These are
> > expected to be common operations of lux algorithm modules in IPAs, and
> > is modeled/copied from Raspberry Pi.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Elder <paul.elder at ideasonboard.com>
> > ---
> > src/ipa/libipa/lux.cpp | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > src/ipa/libipa/lux.h | 45 ++++++++++++++
> > src/ipa/libipa/meson.build | 2 +
> > 3 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 src/ipa/libipa/lux.cpp
> > create mode 100644 src/ipa/libipa/lux.h
> >
> > diff --git a/src/ipa/libipa/lux.cpp b/src/ipa/libipa/lux.cpp
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..756cd3c4
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/src/ipa/libipa/lux.cpp
> > @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2019, Raspberry Pi Ltd
> > + * Copyright (C) 2024, Paul Elder <paul.elder at ideasonboard.com>
> > + *
> > + * lux.h - Helper class that implements lux estimation
> > + */
> No filename please
> > +#include "lux.h"
> > +
> > +#include <algorithm>
> > +#include <chrono>
> > +
> > +#include <libcamera/base/log.h>
> > +
> > +#include "libcamera/internal/yaml_parser.h"
> > +
> > +#include "histogram.h"
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * \file lux.h
> > + * \brief Helper class that implements lux estimation
> > + *
> > + * As estimating the lux level of an image is expected to be a common
> > + * operation, it is implemented in a helper in libipa.
> > + */
> > +
> > +namespace libcamera {
> > +
> > +using namespace std::literals::chrono_literals;
> > +
> > +LOG_DEFINE_CATEGORY(Lux)
> > +
> > +namespace ipa {
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * \class Lux
> > + * \brief Class that implements lux estimation
> > + */
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * \var Lux::referenceExposureTime_
> > + * \brief The exposure time of the reference image, in microseconds.
> > + */
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * \var Lux::referenceGain_
> > + * \brief The analogue gain of the reference image.
> > + */
>
> Analogue gain only? What if there was digital gain applied when the reference was collected?
>
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * \var Lux::referenceAperture_
> > + * \brief The aperture of the reference image in units of 1/f.
> > + */
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * \var Lux::referenceY_
> > + * \brief The measured luminance of the reference image, out of 65536.
>
> 65536? Or 65535?
>
> > + */
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * \var Lux::referenceLux_
> > + * \brief The estimated lux level of the reference image.
> > + */
> > +
> > +int Lux::readYaml(const YamlObject &tuningData)
>
> This is a public function, so I think it should have a doxygen comment?
>
> > +{
> > + auto value = tuningData["reference_exposure_time"].get<double>();
> > + if (!value) {
> > + LOG(Lux, Error) << "Missing tuning parameter: 'reference_exposure_time'";
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + referenceExposureTime_ = *value * 1.0us;
>
> Laurent suggested switching to integration time everywhere, as exposure time tends to get shortened
> to "exposure".
I think we need a tree-wide patch for this. The naming in this patch can
be kept if it gets merged first.
> > +
> > + value = tuningData["reference_gain"].get<double>();
> > + if (!value) {
> > + LOG(Lux, Error) << "Missing tuning parameter: 'reference_gain'";
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + referenceGain_ = *value;
> > +
> > + referenceAperture_ = tuningData["reference_aperture"].get<double>(1.0);
> > +
> > + value = tuningData["reference_Y"].get<double>();
> > + if (!value) {
> > + LOG(Lux, Error) << "Missing tuning parameter: 'reference_Y'";
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + referenceY_ = *value;
> > +
> > + value = tuningData["reference_lux"].get<double>();
> > + if (!value) {
> > + LOG(Lux, Error) << "Missing tuning parameter: 'reference_lux'";
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > + referenceLux_ = *value;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +double Lux::process(double gain, utils::Duration exposureTime, double aperture,
> > + const Histogram &yHist) const
>
> We've no constraints on the name here, so I think "estimateLux" would be better. Also needs a
> doxygen comment I think?
>
> > +{
> > + double currentY = yHist.interQuantileMean(0, 1);
> > + double gainRatio = referenceGain_ / gain;
> > + double exposureTimeRatio = referenceExposureTime_ / exposureTime;
> > + double apertureRatio = referenceAperture_ / aperture;
> > + double yRatio = currentY * (65536 / yHist.bins()) / referenceY_;
> > +
> > + double estimatedLux = exposureTimeRatio * gainRatio *
> > + apertureRatio * apertureRatio *
> > + yRatio * referenceLux_;
>
> apertureRatio is in here twice; is that accidental?
The aperture is expressed as a number proportional to the diameter of
the entrance pupil, while the exposure if proportional to the area of
the pupil. This is worth a comment.
We don't support aperture control though, so maybe the simplest option
would be to drop it.
> Do you know the background to the formula? It's
> a bit strange, in my view...our assumption from the mean luminance AGC is of a linear relationship
> between "total exposure" (comprising integration time multiplied by gain) and the average of the
> yHist, but that's not really reflected here.
>
> > +
> > + LOG(Lux, Debug) << "Estimated lux " << estimatedLux;
> > + return estimatedLux;
> > +}
> > +
> > +} /* namespace ipa */
> > +
> > +} /* namespace libcamera */
> > diff --git a/src/ipa/libipa/lux.h b/src/ipa/libipa/lux.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000..6bc9cf9f
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/src/ipa/libipa/lux.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause */
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2019, Raspberry Pi Ltd
> > + * Copyright (C) 2024, Paul Elder <paul.elder at ideasonboard.com>
> > + *
> > + * lux.h - Helper class that implements lux estimation
> > + */
>
> No file name please
>
> > +
> > +#pragma once
> > +
> > +#include <algorithm>
> > +#include <tuple>
> > +#include <vector>
> > +
> > +#include <libcamera/base/utils.h>
> > +
> > +#include "libcamera/internal/yaml_parser.h"
> > +
> > +#include "histogram.h"
> > +
> > +namespace libcamera {
> > +
> > +namespace ipa {
> > +
> > +class Lux
> > +{
> > +public:
> > + Lux() = default;
> > + ~Lux() = default;
> > +
> > + int readYaml(const YamlObject &tuningData);
> > + double process(double gain, utils::Duration exposureTime,
> > + double aperture, const Histogram &yHist) const;
> > +
> > +private:
> > + utils::Duration referenceExposureTime_;
> > + double referenceGain_;
> > + double referenceAperture_;
> > + double referenceY_;
> > + double referenceLux_;
> > +};
> > +
> > +} /* namespace ipa */
> > +
> > +} /* namespace libcamera */
> > diff --git a/src/ipa/libipa/meson.build b/src/ipa/libipa/meson.build
> > index 0796982e..b6d58900 100644
> > --- a/src/ipa/libipa/meson.build
> > +++ b/src/ipa/libipa/meson.build
> > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ libipa_headers = files([
> > 'exposure_mode_helper.h',
> > 'fc_queue.h',
> > 'histogram.h',
> > + 'lux.h',
> > 'matrix.h',
> > 'module.h',
> > 'pwl.h',
> > @@ -21,6 +22,7 @@ libipa_sources = files([
> > 'exposure_mode_helper.cpp',
> > 'fc_queue.cpp',
> > 'histogram.cpp',
> > + 'lux.cpp',
> > 'matrix.cpp',
> > 'module.cpp',
> > 'pwl.cpp'
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list