[PATCH v2 00/12] Preparation for per-frame-controls and initial tests
Stefan Klug
stefan.klug at ideasonboard.com
Wed Mar 13 13:12:11 CET 2024
v1->v2:
v1 errornously contained patch 08 two time and therefore didn't apply.
Hi everyone,
unknowingly I stumbled into a topic that is way larger than I thought in the
beginning. Delayed-controls and a closely related topic per-frame-controls.
I (now) know that a lot of work already went into this, noteably by
Jacopo Mondi, David Plowman and Naushir Patuck:
https://patchwork.libcamera.org/cover/16458/
https://github.com/raspberrypi/libcamera/tree/pfc
Thanks for that!
I started off without per-frame-controls in mind (only delayed-controls)
and soon realized, that these two are closely related. (It's difficult to
test delayed-controls in a real pipeline without working per-frame-controls)
To be able to tackle the whole topic in the long run I'd like to split it into parts:
1. Get a initial set of tests on mainline
I'd like to have them as a discussion basis and a reference to test against.
These shouldn't be treated as mandatory for now (ideas on how to express that in
code are very welcome)
- Initial lc-compliance tests for delayed-controls (and because these are system tests
also for per-frame-controls)
- A reworked delayed controls class that hopefully makes things easier
- Tested on rkisp1 (details see below)
2. Get an agreement on "RaspberryPi" mode
In the previous work by David and Naushir, the (in my understanding) most prominent
requiremnet was the ability to set a control ASAP even when multiple
requests are queued already (which makes complete sense IMHO). This requirement
shall not get lost and I think there is a way to make it work.
3. Get the tests to pass on rkisp1, rpi and ipu3
I guess this will take a while and involve different parties, so let's not wait
until everything works everywhere...
4. Make the tests mandatory (details tbd)
This series contains part 1.
One change of thought is, that we add the ability to push requests to delayed
controls for a given sequence number and to re-push for the
same sequence number. This has the benefit, that we don't have to decide
early on if we operate in strict per-frame-controls mode (sometimes called
"android mode") or in "raspberry pi" mode.
Stefan Klug (12):
libcamera: lc-compliance: Add controls param to start() function
libcamera: lc-compliance: Add TimeSheet class
libcamera: lc-compliance: Add initial set of per-frame-control tests
libcamera: delayed_controls: Update unit tests to expected semantics
libcamera: delayed_controls: Rename class members
libcamera: delayed_controls: Rework delayed controls implementation
libcamera: delayed_controls: Add some logging
libcamera: delayed_controls: Add ctrls list parameter to reset()
function
pipeline: rkisp1: Move call to setSensorControls.emit()
pipeline: rkisp1: Add more debug logging
pipeline: rkisp1: Fix per-frame-controls in manual mode
pipeline: rkisp1: Apply initial controls
include/libcamera/internal/delayed_controls.h | 20 +-
include/libcamera/ipa/rkisp1.mojom | 7 +-
src/apps/lc-compliance/capture_test.cpp | 46 +++
src/apps/lc-compliance/meson.build | 2 +
src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp | 316 ++++++++++++++++++
src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h | 43 +++
src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.cpp | 4 +-
src/apps/lc-compliance/simple_capture.h | 2 +-
src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp | 145 ++++++++
src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h | 55 +++
src/ipa/rkisp1/algorithms/agc.cpp | 4 +-
src/ipa/rkisp1/rkisp1.cpp | 49 ++-
src/libcamera/delayed_controls.cpp | 235 ++++++++++---
src/libcamera/pipeline/rkisp1/rkisp1.cpp | 11 +-
test/delayed_controls.cpp | 203 ++++++++---
15 files changed, 1021 insertions(+), 121 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.cpp
create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/per_frame_controls.h
create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.cpp
create mode 100644 src/apps/lc-compliance/time_sheet.h
--
2.40.1
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list