RFC: API change: Make CameraManager provide a list of CameraDescription objects

[Milan Zamazal]

Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> writes:

> <somewhat offtopic>
>
> Actually my "could really use some help wrt someone reviewing" remark was
> not targeted at you (Laurent). I was trying to stimulate others to do
> more reviewing. Having you do all the reviews does not scale.

Yes.  The problem is that with the highly skilled people around (both
the posters and reviewers) and the knowledge required (libcamera design,
kernel, sensors, advanced C++, ...) I often think about the
contribution/noise ratio my review would bring.  To deal with this, I
try to review at least all what touches software ISP and to watch other
reviews to learn from them.

> Actually this is also something where I want to do better myself. E.g.
> I should be able to review Milan's software ISP cleanup series. 

Hint: Several people have already helped with reviewing the series.
As of v5, patches still missing any reviews are #7 and #15-18.

> But atm my priorities are at closing bugs in pipewire video/libcamera
> support before these ship to end users in Fedora 41.

That's certainly very important and thank you for working on that.

> Once that is done I'll hopefully have some bandwidth to help out with
> reviews.

Thank you.

> </somewhat offtopic>