[PATCH v2 14/20] libcamera: ipa: Remove unused includes
Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Mon Sep 2 14:35:25 CEST 2024
Hi Milan,
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 02:19:27PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> Laurent Pinchart writes:
> > On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 05:27:11PM +0200, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> >> The includes that are not used can be removed.
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Milan Zamazal <mzamazal at redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> include/libcamera/ipa/ipa_interface.h | 5 -----
> >> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/include/libcamera/ipa/ipa_interface.h b/include/libcamera/ipa/ipa_interface.h
> >> index 7c835e98..2fdc085e 100644
> >> --- a/include/libcamera/ipa/ipa_interface.h
> >> +++ b/include/libcamera/ipa/ipa_interface.h
> >> @@ -7,11 +7,6 @@
> >>
> >> #pragma once
> >>
> >> -#include <map>
> >> -#include <stddef.h>
> >> -#include <stdint.h>
> >> -#include <vector>
> >> -
> >> #include <libcamera/base/flags.h>
> >> #include <libcamera/base/signal.h>
> >
> > I think all the other includes can be dropped too.
>
> I'm not sure. ipa_interface.h is included in the generated files and
> they rely on the includes (and what is worse, apparently on things
> included through them). Perhaps this should be fixed by including the
> corresponding stuff at the right places but I'm worried by the fact that
> LSP doesn't mark these includes as redundant (apparently for a reason).
> I would rather not mess with the generated code in this patch series.
We can handle it in a separate series, but I think it should still be
fixed.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
More information about the libcamera-devel
mailing list